Test driving The Triple Threat!

[GLC]

If it almost wins with a flatbet, then that's about the right odds against us.  Here's what I'm afraid of.  No matter how many steps in a marty you're willing to risk, there's always a string of losses that you could run into that are 1 loss beyond your maximum bet.  If you go for more wins to recover losses, there's always a section of spins that have so few wins vs losses that you just gradually go deeper and deeper in the hole until you finally end up at the same place you did with the marty.

Given both scenarios, a little luck and neither one of the extremes may happen to you or else either one could happen the first time you sit down to play.  Pick your poison.

I lean toward the D'Alembert concept over the Martingale concept.  With the D'Alembert, if you can stay in the game long enough there's a chance you can come back from a deep hole.

That's why I like the Full TrioPlay concept because if things start going to far in the hole, we start adjusting our bets to mitigate our losses and we always have a stop loss to keep from total disaster.

GLC

[SamNL]

Hey Buff,

I haven't forgotten about The Triple Threat idea.
Have been busy with lots of other things lately.
I might be doing some tests with this again and see how it goes.