• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Go with the Flow

Started by ignatus, May 20, 12:24 PM 2015

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

ignatus

Thanks for testing soggett!  :)

No, i haven't done more tests with this one!

If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

soggett

Quote from: ignatus on Jun 13, 09:17 AM 2015
Thanks for testing soggett!  :)

No, i haven't done more tests with this one!


well I haven't got a clue as how i did the first test back then lol

I will give this a longer run when I get the time, if it turns out good I'll let you know (fingers crossed ;D)



edit:

500 spin test, flatbetting continuosly (not stopping and waiting for new trigger, going with the flow :xd: :xd:)

looks perfect for a light progression so far, what you think ignatus?
To beat the game you first have to realise you can't beat the game - then comes the hard part

soggett

ok, did a full 4k test

flatbetting ends up +5
highest +25
lowest -38

seems pretty stable, ups and downs, needs good MM and we may have something here
anyone needs w/l  just ask (can't seem to find the reveal/hide function)

gonna try stopping and waiting for new trigger also when I get time
To beat the game you first have to realise you can't beat the game - then comes the hard part

soggett

How do you like them apples  :xd: :xd:

frist MM i thinked of trying, hope next ones will only be better  ;D ;D
To beat the game you first have to realise you can't beat the game - then comes the hard part

soggett

even better this time

max bet was 10 units

ends +327

think ill call it a day and wait for responses 8) 8)
To beat the game you first have to realise you can't beat the game - then comes the hard part

ozon

Very light drawdowns. Which MM do You use?

ignatus

Thanks again soggett, great results!  :)

Nice that someone actually makes the effort and really play/test the system
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

soggett

Quote from: ozon on Jun 14, 10:08 AM 2015
Very light drawdowns. Which MM do You use?

first one i used flat for 5 losses then clasic marty 10 step (got to step 10 only once) - but wouldnt play that, that was just to see how it goes

second one i used flat first 5 losses then +2 units, so 3 unit bet for next 5 bets (when +6 or +3 reset (so w or lw)), then if 5 losses up to 5 units per bet (looking to get +15 in that stage then reset or if +10 get down to 3 unit bet) then if 5 losses up to 10 unit per bet (+20 or higher then step down to 5) reseting when in profit or if though situation then at -5 and call it a day :D  - I was messing around with that one, basically needs more tweaking and maybe 1 more lvl



Quote from: ignatus on Jun 14, 10:19 AM 2015
Thanks again soggett, great results!  :)

Nice that someone actually makes the effort and really play/test the system

no problem, I'd test it sooner but was busy, then I looked it up and actually forgot how i tested it the first time lol
so far looks good, evenly spread out

Im thinking of maybe betting 1111222233334444... and moving up and down as we play... gotta look up some of GLC's post and find a good progression to use  ;D
To beat the game you first have to realise you can't beat the game - then comes the hard part

ozon

Why it is so quiet here, at last bet selection, which make profit flatbet after 4k spins, but I do not have the RX from manual tests with 1111222233334444 ..... and stop lose 220 units, looks really good.

Tomla021

this is a good bet--i studied and tested it----very smooth up you go bet
"No Whining, just Winning"

ignatus

Quote from: Tomla021 on Jun 22, 01:46 PM 2015
this is a good bet--i studied and tested it----very smooth up you go bet

Thanks :) Glad you liked it.

I just took a break from roulette for awhile because i saw the lack of interest in my systems.
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

Tomla021

theres no lack of interest I dont think. peeps are trying to find something that is consistant , makes sense , that shows promise for making money..... all of the above and its so hard to find:)
"No Whining, just Winning"

MrJ

You would be surprised the number of people that may play your method(s) and you won't hear a single word about it. Trust me, people ARE playing or at minimum, testing the various methods on the board.

Ken
Watch us big doggs, the MEN, play at a REAL casino, on a REAL table. All we ask is that you stay out of our way. The rest? Bots, airball, RNG...that's more for the Kitty Kat Klub. Its the big doggs and the kittens!! Winning is not an event, it's a process and it takes YEARS and YEARS to master > link:://:.eonline.com/eol_images/Entire_Site/2014127/rs_560x415-140227131132-1024.bulldog-kittens3.jpg... To be great, you have to be willing to be mocked, hated and misunderstood.

ignatus

Quote from: MrJ on Jun 22, 05:19 PM 2015
You would be surprised the number of people that may play your method(s) and you won't hear a single word about it. Trust me, people ARE playing or at minimum, testing the various methods on the board.

Ken

Ok, thanks Ken. Maybe i shouldn't give up then.. ;)
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

thelaw

Has anyone considered a Labby or Divisor Method for this?

Anyone have a w/L example for this?

Also, Ignatus, you have contributed a great deal to this forum in a way that I haven't seen before. System explanation + Test + Graphic = perfect presentation!!!

Keep up the great work-Thanks! :)
You sir.......are a monster!!!

-