Kimo Li's Methods

[thelaw]

Let's keep it consistent with the above. I'll aim for a hit within 3 spins with 12 numbers.

Please note as I mentioned on the other Kimo Li thread the results I expect from this are in line with probability.

So you want 20 numbers and then you will give me 12 numbers that should hit within 3 spins? Correct?

Now as for dealer change, with Spielbank they change about every 20 spins, so where does that leave us?

[thelaw]

Yes, I played the G.U.T. and loved it.  It is one of the most fun systems I've ever played.  (Is it a system?  Not sure.)  Anyway, I personally do not have the mental strength to play it correctly.  That means if I have strict rules, I cannot follow them.  I'd rather gamble than win.  I bet on a crossing too many times and create my own crossings:  "The winkel non-crossing crossing", for example.

I have the software archived and will play again sometime.

Now, is it a winning method  For a person who is dedicated and truly wants to win money, it may be.  It certainly gets a lot of wins.  The trick--and winkel says this--is to jump back to twenty quite often. 

Ok, I'm done.

Sam

Can you elaborate on "jump back to twenty"? Thanks!

[1eleven]

So you want 20 numbers and then you will give me 12 numbers that should hit within 3 spins? Correct?

Now as for dealer change, with Spielbank they change about every 20 spins, so where does that leave us?

Oh ok - how about 12 spins and I'll provide 12 numbers for the next 3? 

[thelaw]

Oh ok - how about 12 spins and I'll provide 12 numbers for the next 3?

You got it!

6       
14
30
32
5
20       
26       
14
16
15       
14
22

[1eleven]

Next 3 spins:
4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 14, 22, 25, 32, 33, 35, 36

[1eleven]

Yes, I played the G.U.T. and loved it.  It is one of the most fun systems I've ever played.  (Is it a system?  Not sure.)  Anyway, I personally do not have the mental strength to play it correctly.  That means if I have strict rules, I cannot follow them.  I'd rather gamble than win.  I bet on a crossing too many times and create my own crossings:  "The winkel non-crossing crossing", for example.

I have the software archived and will play again sometime.

Now, is it a winning method  For a person who is dedicated and truly wants to win money, it may be.  It certainly gets a lot of wins.  The trick--and winkel says this--is to jump back to twenty quite often. 

Ok, I'm done.

Sam

Hi Sam,
Could you give a short summary of this method (in English)?  That long thread is ridiculous so if you could provide whatever the steps are I'd be happy to test this.

[thelaw]

Next 3 spins:
4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 14, 22, 25, 32, 33, 35, 36

3
17       
14w

+11

Spielbank table #3 05.06.15

Next 12 later tonight!

[marvin]

To use your analogy: you are claiming that there is a well, when you yourself have no water.

How do you know that there is no water?
All you have to to is go to well, the direction is provided and check it out your self. Or you wanted us to fetch some water for you?

It seems like you've been scammed before thats why you are trolling like this and wanted to make sure  that it won't happen again.
But there are other ways to do that, such as do your own test by studying their methods/tools. don't just do a half-assed test like running it for a million spins without understanding it.

Yes, I played the G.U.T. and loved it.  It is one of the most fun systems I've ever played.  (Is it a system?  Not sure.)  Anyway, I personally do not have the mental strength to play it correctly.  That means if I have strict rules, I cannot follow them.  I'd rather gamble than win.  I bet on a crossing too many times and create my own crossings:  "The winkel non-crossing crossing", for example.

I have the software archived and will play again sometime.

Now, is it a winning method  For a person who is dedicated and truly wants to win money, it may be.  It certainly gets a lot of wins.  The trick--and winkel says this--is to jump back to twenty quite often. 

Ok, I'm done.

Sam

Sam, tell me how many times you've read/tried Winkels GUT before you were able to understand. For me to tell you honestly I have only understand it when i saw your video and heard those devilish laugh      every time the number hits.
And this is exactly what i mean Sam, these strategies are almost non mechanical. it requires some decision making based on the previous data provided(math guys please ignore) like when crossing 19-18 comes it does not mean that your going to bet on 19, you still have to evaluate it by which only experience can teach you that. the same goes for the Kimo li strategies/patterns that every number is a trigger or a star as he refers to it.

Winkels only request is to create your own progression while Kimo Li's is to create your own strategy based on the tool that he provided.

[thelaw]

How do you know that there is no water?
All you have to to is go to well, the direction is provided and check it out your self. Or you wanted us to fetch some water for you?

It seems like you've been scammed before thats why you are trolling like this and wanted to make sure  that it won't happen again.
But there are other ways to do that, such as do your own test by studying their methods/tools. don't just do a half-assed test like running it for a million spins without understanding it.

Sam, tell me how many times you've read/tried Winkels GUT before you were able to understand. For me to tell you honestly I have only understand it when i saw your video and heard those devilish laugh      every time the number hits.
And this is exactly what i mean Sam, these strategies are almost non mechanical. it requires some decision making based on the previous data provided(math guys please ignore) like when crossing 19-18 comes it does not mean that your going to bet on 19, you still have to evaluate it by which only experience can teach you that. the same goes for the Kimo li strategies/patterns that every number is a trigger or a star as he refers to it.

Winkels only request is to create your own progression while Kimo Li's is to create your own strategy based on the tool that he provided.

No more time for bickering, onto the testing!

[1eleven]

thelaw,
Can we ignore the units and just track hits/misses?

Right now, I have 2 hits and 0 miss.

We could run various progressions after, if you'd like.

[thelaw]

thelaw,
Can we ignore the units and just track hits/misses?

Right now, I have 2 hits and 0 miss.

We could run various progressions after, if you'd like.

I'm confused - where do you get 2 hits?

[1eleven]

The first batch of numbers you posted on this thread. (Reply #17)

[thelaw]

The first batch of numbers you posted on this thread. (Reply #17)

Got it!

[nottophammer]

Hi marvin

19-18 i'd go for 18  plus the 1 repeat,treat as 2 separate bets thou

[diego]

Hello everyone I tell them I've tried unsuccessfully kimoli system which lost a lot of money. Pedi help in this forum mr marvin is supposedly the only answer you know and follow me no more 3-reel data. THIS MADE ME TO LOSE. See mr KIMOLI nor achieve desired response. The only hope was to win something to cover the cost of my extended family as you also probably do. Surely the lucky people who win has nothing to share with us who are losers in the game. hug and apologize as translator use. sorry lot in life for all.