Kimo Li's Methods

[Tamino]

CU  again once this Kimo charade has  bitten the dust.

HAPPY WINNINGS !!!


Tamino

[RFMAXX]

sorry, busy. first three:

1:
Standard Bet: 2,9,10,12,13,16,19,20,26,39,30,34 for 3 spins
tweak 1: 2,9,10,12,13,16 for 6 spins
tweak 2: 19,20,26,29,30,34,21,23,24,27,28,31 for 3 spins

2:
Standard Bet: 1,3,11,15,17,18,21,23,24,27,28,31
tweak 1: 1,3,11,15,17,18
tweak 2: 21,23,24,27,28,31,2,9,12,10,13,16

3:
Standard Bet: 1,3,11,15,17,18,21,23,24,27,28,31
tweak 1: 21,23,24,27,28,31
tweak 2: 22,25,32,33,35,36,1,3,11,15,17,18

no hit at a 12 numbers bet ends the game.
no hit at 6 numbers bet: please post the 6 losing numbers and i will post another 6. thanks.

[thelaw]

sorry, busy. first three:

1:
Standard Bet: 2,9,10,12,13,16,19,20,26,39,30,34 for 3 spins
tweak 1: 2,9,10,12,13,16 for 6 spins
tweak 2: 19,20,26,29,30,34,21,23,24,27,28,31 for 3 spins

2:
Standard Bet: 1,3,11,15,17,18,21,23,24,27,28,31
tweak 1: 1,3,11,15,17,18
tweak 2: 21,23,24,27,28,31,2,9,12,10,13,16

3:
Standard Bet: 1,3,11,15,17,18,21,23,24,27,28,31
tweak 1: 21,23,24,27,28,31
tweak 2: 22,25,32,33,35,36,1,3,11,15,17,18

no hit at a 12 numbers bet ends the game.
no hit at 6 numbers bet: please post the 6 losing numbers and i will post another 6. thanks.

OK. Remaxx, the deal was 6 previous numbers provided, and you give 6 numbers for the next 6 spins. All of these "alternate" bets are just muddying the waters.

Feel free to post your 6 number bets for all 10 tests when you get a chance-no rush, take your time. Thanks!

[1eleven]

Won 15 out of 16, not 9 out of 10.

[amk]

All methods will win for a certain amount of time, the HG is knowing when to stop.....

This knowing is either luck or an accurate calculated assumption.


Hope Kimo Li's method will pass thelaws testing criteria. I would then confidently play the method live until I lose my set aside BR, perhaps I might not lose it?

[Kimo Li]

Michael J. “Crocodile” Dundee: [a goanna is sizzling over a fire. Sue looks ill] How do you like your goanna? Medium? Well done?
Sue Charlton: You don't really expect me to eat that?
Michael J. “Crocodile” Dundee: Yeah, it’s great. Yeah, try some of these yams, try the grubs and the sugar ants. Just bite the end off, they're really sweet. Black fellas love 'em.
Sue Charlton:  [tentatively tries a large beetle] What about you, aren't you having any?
Michael J. “Crocodile” Dundee: Me? [Mick starts working on a tin with his knife]
Michael J. “Crocodile” Dundee: ...Well, you can live on it, but it taste like shit.


Michael J. “Crocodile” Dundee: [the ball is spinning. Sue looks ill] How do you like [Pinwheel]?
Sue Charlton: You don't really expect me to [play] that?
Michael J. “Crocodile” Dundee: Yeah, it’s great. Yeah, try some of these [stars], try the [pies] and the [three spins). Just [start betting], they're really [easy]. [roulette] fellas love 'em.
Sue Charlton:  [tentatively places a bet] What about you, aren't you [betting]?
Michael J. “Crocodile” Dundee: Me? [Mick starts working on some chips]
Michael J. “Crocodile” Dundee: ...Well, you can live on it, but [you actually have to work].

[thelaw]

Won 15 out of 16, not 9 out of 10.

Yes, you are absolutely correct. I was just trying to give round numbers for an example.

My apologies.

How are your personal tests going?

[thelaw]

Michael J. “Crocodile” Dundee: [a goanna is sizzling over a fire. Sue looks ill] How do you like your goanna? Medium? Well done?
Sue Charlton: You don't really expect me to eat that?
Michael J. “Crocodile” Dundee: Yeah, it’s great. Yeah, try some of these yams, try the grubs and the sugar ants. Just bite the end off, they're really sweet. Black fellas love 'em.
Sue Charlton:  [tentatively tries a large beetle] What about you, aren't you having any?
Michael J. “Crocodile” Dundee: Me? [Mick starts working on a tin with his knife]
Michael J. “Crocodile” Dundee: ...Well, you can live on it, but it taste like shit.


Michael J. “Crocodile” Dundee: [the ball is spinning. Sue looks ill] How do you like [Pinwheel]?
Sue Charlton: You don't really expect me to [play] that?
Michael J. “Crocodile” Dundee: Yeah, it’s great. Yeah, try some of these [stars], try the [pies] and the [three spins). Just [start betting], they're really [easy]. [roulette] fellas love 'em.
Sue Charlton:  [tentatively places a bet] What about you, aren't you [betting]?
Michael J. “Crocodile” Dundee: Me? [Mick starts working on some chips]
Michael J. “Crocodile” Dundee: ...Well, you can live on it, but [you actually have to work].

More great insights from Kimo


He just can't stay away.........too much attention.

[amk]

link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=NKY_PCht5mk

[Kimo Li]

Mods,

I believe the bully mentality needs to be addressed. Taunting will only lead to an antagonistic climate.

thelaw,

Your quest to prove the validity of one of my methods is commendable.
It already has been proven, but not by you. I think you really want this to work because you want to find the HG.
When it fails, you want to relish in the limelight of look at me, I told you so.
Either way, you will win. If it proves to be right, you would have found the HG. If it's wrong, look at me I win.

But here's the funny thing, I win too. I never expected it. My spreadsheet sales is going through the roof. My book sales has tripled in the last 2 weeks.
I thank you, because all payments received goes to charities. It always has and always will.

Kimo Li

[thelaw]

Mods,

I believe the bully mentality needs to be addressed. Taunting will only lead to an antagonistic climate.

thelaw,

Your quest to prove the validity of one of my methods is commendable.
It already has been proven, but not by you. I think you really want this to work because you want to find the HG.
When it fails, you want to relish in the limelight of look at me, I told you so.
Either way, you will win. If it proves to be right, you would have found the HG. If it's wrong, look at me I win.

But here's the funny thing, I win too. I never expected it. My spreadsheet sales is going through the roof. My book sales has tripled in the last 2 weeks.
I thank you, because all payments received goes to charities. It always has and always will.

Kimo Li

Kimo,

What choice do we have?

You have chosen not to share any details of your system. So what are we to do?

Just leave it and say : "Kimo's stuff doesn't work", or actually test it out without any help from you.

I am choosing to test it out and see if it works. If it does, then it will be because I took the initiative with the help of other members-no thanks to you. If it doesn't, then I'll have to say that will still don't have any evidence of a working system.

But let me make one thing crystal clear: You are responsible for the burden of proof for your system, not us. You made the claims, and now you must back it up. Your "proof" thus far has been 2 links that do not show any solid evidence of a winning system.

As for your book and spreadsheets sales, we have no way of verifying those numbers, and this just sounds to me like a wind-up designed to provoke a reaction.

Well, Kimo, it's been fun, but from this point forward I won't be communicating with you directly as I have gained nothing from it. Best of luck to you!

[Kimo Li]

Good luck to you.

[ati]

5000 spins is nothing. That's far from enough to see if something works or not, that's why I personally don't take most threads with manual 100 spin tests seriously. Last weekend I ran many tests in excel for different bet selections, and steep progressions. It can never fail, otherwise it would wipe out one's roll in no time. And one of them didn't fail for about 30000 spins, I already imagined spending the money I was hoping to win with it, but then it lost. Now I could have made a HG thread showing a bunch of 500 spin sessions winning, but it would haven been just another time waster in the end. Also tried with stop loss, but that never works. It always happens just often enough to lose in the long run.

[ego]

Mods,

I believe the bully mentality needs to be addressed. Taunting will only lead to an antagonistic climate.

thelaw,

Your quest to prove the validity of one of my methods is commendable.
It already has been proven, but not by you. I think you really want this to work because you want to find the HG.
When it fails, you want to relish in the limelight of look at me, I told you so.
Either way, you will win. If it proves to be right, you would have found the HG. If it's wrong, look at me I win.

But here's the funny thing, I win too. I never expected it. My spreadsheet sales is going through the roof. My book sales has tripled in the last 2 weeks.
I thank you, because all payments received goes to charities. It always has and always will.

Kimo Li

Hello Kimo Li - that is very nice of you giving all the profit to charities - this means you are a man with good charistics.

Cheers

[Azim]

Sure. If we are talking in absolutes then, if you had millions, you could use any progression.

To truly have a HG system, you would probably need the following (my opinion based on the posts I've read over the years) :

1) System that works with a moderate bankroll (less than $500)

2) System that can be used on a live wheel without an enormous amount of waiting (betting at least once every five spins)

3) System that can be calculated in time to make proper bets

4) Bets must be placed before the dealer releases ball

5) System that everyone can learn (within reason-no "gut feeling" - just simple math)

What do you think?

HG on silver platter!!!