Holy Grail by Winkel with examples.

[Azim]

Post your results. Only till the result were you have questions.
Wait for an answer and let everyone know the outcome after.

e.g 

-   -       37   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0
1   36      36   1   1   0   0   0   0   0   0
2   9      35   2   2   0   0   0   0   0   0
3   32      34   3   3   0   0   0   0   0   0
4   29      33   4   4   0   0   0   0   0   0
5   5      32   5   5   0   0   0   0   0   0
6   24      31   6   6   0   0   0   0   0   0
7   17      30   7   7   0   0   0   0   0   0
8   12      29   8   8   0   0   0   0   0   0
9   28      28   9   9   0   0   0   0   0   0
10   23      27   10   10   0   0   0   0   0   0
11   30      26   11   11   0   0   0   0   0   0
12   11      25   12   12   0   0   0   0   0   0
13   35      24   13   13   0   0   0   0   0   0
14   7      23   14   14   0   0   0   0   0   0
15   35      23   14   13   1   1   0   0   0   0
16   15      22   15   14   1   1   0   0   0   0
17   18      21   16   15   1   1   0   0   0   0
18   26      20   17   16   1   1   0   0   0   0
19   14      19   18   17   1   1   0   0   0   0
20   26      19   18   16   2   2   0   0   0   0
21   16      18   19   17   2   2   0   0   0   0
22   12      18   19   16   3   3   0   0   0   0
23   25      17   20   17   3   3   0   0   0   0

Do I bet the 17 vs 17 crossing?

Wait for an answer and post the result.

24   0      16   21   18   3   3   0   0   0   19
25   35      16   21   18   3   2   1   1   0   19
26   34      15   22   19   3   2   1   1   0   19

Good luck everyone.

[nottophammer]

Hi Azim & wink
Azim you'll see on the paper tracker a column KTF, this method i now use with Winkels method. You see 9#'s in 1st 10 spins,the next 30 spins  should hit 15.7 numbers, so 15+9 24 numbers hit by 40th spin and as you can see 25 have hit +1 more than the 15 expected. Or if we do the correct way round up it gets its 16 hits,perfect.
Anyway crossing 16-15 arrives but i dont fancy it so bet the 1x + 2x and win.

Now spin 41 is 0x     1x     >1
                        11    17     9      the 0x and >1 are near to crossing. now to get the crossing we need the 0x to hit or the 1x to hit so we should bet both, yes or no. Well we would win.
42nd spin is now 10-18-9  so near to crossing so should we bet again 0x+1x. would win is this the way Winkel wanted to try and explain.
43rd spin shows 10-17-10,now to get the crossing we need the 1x's to hit, but the 2x&3x look worrying.( now we have 17 spins left to reach 60 spins usually see 30 numbers hit in 60 spins,remember this is rng, with 27 already hit, repeats are definitely due) as we can see a repeat, if we did bet the 1x's we can rebet and still profit. As you see at the time i was not seeing this but did bet the 1x's and win. so the >1's crossed the 0x's, is that wrong to play this way.

[Azim]

Hi Azim & wink
Azim you'll see on the paper tracker a column KTF, this method i now use with Winkels method. You see 9#'s in 1st 10 spins,the next 30 spins  should hit 15.7 numbers, so 15+9 24 numbers hit by 40th spin and as you can see 25 have hit +1 more than the 15 expected. Or if we do the correct way round up it gets its 16 hits,perfect.
Anyway crossing 16-15 arrives but i dont fancy it so bet the 1x + 2x and win.

Now spin 41 is 0x     1x     >1
                        11    17     9      the 0x and >1 are near to crossing. now to get the crossing we need the 0x to hit or the 1x to hit so we should bet both, yes or no. Well we would win.
42nd spin is now 10-18-9  so near to crossing so should we bet again 0x+1x. would win is this the way Winkel wanted to try and explain.
43rd spin shows 10-17-10,now to get the crossing we need the 1x's to hit, but the 2x&3x look worrying.( now we have 17 spins left to reach 60 spins usually see 30 numbers hit in 60 spins,remember this is rng, with 27 already hit, repeats are definitely due) as we can see a repeat, if we did bet the 1x's we can rebet and still profit. As you see at the time i was not seeing this but did bet the 1x's and win. so the >1's crossed the 0x's, is that wrong to play this way.

nottophammer:

I might be wrong. But no you are playing it right.

I will put them in 3 stages. Stage 1 is to crawl, stage 2 is to walk and last stage is to run.

You have been able to read the crawling part of the system correctly. (Winkel has only shown this because of the negativity).
You are now at a stage were you have started to walk. If you keep it up, you will be able to run and this will became second nature when playing.

Winkel can correct me if I am wrong. What's on the forum is just step 1 of the whole GUT learning curve, no one let Winkel go through the process of walking and running.

[nottophammer]

Thanks Azim
we'll wait and see what the Guvnor thinks