slow progression for the even chances

[hanshuckebein]

I don't know who invented this progression or if it has a name at all.  but this it:

1   1,5   2   2,5   3   etc.
1   1,5   2   2,5   3   etc
1   1,5   2   2,5   3   etc.

you could play this in different ways.

a.  one step further on a loss and if you win stay there until your next loss

b.  further on a loss and continue with the different steps until your in profit again.

maybe this could also be used as some sort of up-as-you-win-progression?

cheers

hans

[chrisbis]

Thought that before, then realised it can only be done on tables with low values, like
0.50 units or even 0.10units/0.25units.

But, yes it does give U the variance to slow the progression right down
to its absolute lowest/safest values, such that Ur always covering the
Bankroll without too much exposure.

Good post Hans. 

[Kav]

Don't be fooled by numbers. This progression is equal to:

2-3-4-5-6....

[ego]

Any one who attempt to play even money bet shold never increase the first three bets 1 1 1 after that is a matter if you are going to be agressive or not or use different stages of attacks.

[Kav]

Any one who attempt to play even money bet shold never increase the first three bets 1 1 1 .

Why you say that?

[ego]

Why you say that?

For exampel when you run a even money bet wich pass 500 000 you will notice there is no need to increase the first three bets to gain a win.

[Kav]

For example when you run a even money bet wich pass 500 000 you will notice there is no need to increase the first three bets to gain a win.

I don't understand what you mean by "no need". By the same thinking there is "no need" to use a positive progression in the first place. You could just flat bet.

Positive progressions have specific advantages and disadvantages. I still can't see why, if one chose to use a positive progression approach, one should not increase the first 3 bets.

[ego]

I don't understand what you mean by "no need". By the same thinking there is "no need" to use a positive progression in the first place. You could just flat bet.

Positive progressions have specific advantages and disadvantages. I still can't see why, if one chose to use a positive progression approach, one should not increase the first 3 bets.

The why is simpel and I am not sure what you say or state - my experience passing 800 000 trails using even money position and end up with a positive gain is to get as many attempts as possibal to coup with bad swings and recoup.
I find using a humbel progression at levels or a long not agressive progression does not fail as quick as others do - wich all my testing in the past indicates.


Sure you can have a different experience or other opinion - but that is what I find out.

And regarding flat-betting so am i the only one on public internet wich have explain easy simpel rules with simulation software and show the public how to reach 3 std flat-betting with sampels of 10 000 wich no one else has done.
Many pepole use the word flat-betting and have no knowledge about it at all.


Cheers