Vaddis Holy Grail

[1eleven]

Well.............where would the threads by Falkor, Kimo Li, Reyth (Roulette30), or John Legend be now if nobody called them out?

Maybe, jut maybe, from this point forward, we all demand proof before listening to another member's claims..................just a thought.

They wouldn't be able to talk about it, they've signed a non-disclosure agreement!! 

[vladir]

Here is session 3 from hell.

What are you playin here? And why the 3rd graphic seems so different from the others?

[Azim]

What are you playin here? And why the 3rd graphic seems so different from the others?

All 4 sessions are played the same way. Doubles and singles.

Session 3 from hell is what everyone says RNG is fixed.

[RouletteGhost]

All 4 sessions are played the same way. Doubles and singles.

Session 3 from hell is what everyone says RNG is fixed.

RNG is not roulette. RNG computer simulation will never act like a roulette wheel

Even if the RNG is true RNG it will never behave like a wheel and ball

I would never advocate creating and testing a system on any RNG

If you prefer fast play goto a airball wheel

[Azim]

RNG is not roulette. RNG computer simulation will never act like a roulette wheel

Even if the RNG is true RNG it will never behave like a wheel and ball

I would never advocate creating and testing a system on any RNG

If you prefer fast play goto a airball wheel

Airball wheel is RNG too.

[1eleven]

RNG is not roulette. RNG computer simulation will never act like a roulette wheel

Even if the RNG is true RNG it will never behave like a wheel and ball

I would never advocate creating and testing a system on any RNG

If you prefer fast play goto a airball wheel

Prove it.

[RouletteGhost]

Prove it.

I don't think proof is needed

I think it's clear to see a computer random number generator will not operate the same as a real wheel....how it acts, dealer signature etc etc.....no way is RNG the same

I thought this was common sense

[ddarko]

Prove it.

Your mind is made up, look up Confirmation Bias.......

[Azim]

I don't think proof is needed

I think it's clear to see a computer random number generator will not operate the same as a real wheel....how it acts, dealer signature etc etc.....no way is RNG the same

I thought this was common sense

Search the forum and you will see there was a discussion on this. No one could prove where the published number's came from but the poster.

Sorry to burst your bubble.

[1eleven]

Your mind is made up, look up Confirmation Bias.......

Please come up with your own material. Thank you.

[1eleven]

I don't think proof is needed

I think it's clear to see a computer random number generator will not operate the same as a real wheel....how it acts, dealer signature etc etc.....no way is RNG the same

I thought this was common sense

Do you win on either a live table or RNG?

[vladir]

Someone reading this... would think that there are at least "two kinds of randomness". One randomness produced by RNG's and another kind produced by roulettes...  How do we distinguish one from the other?

[Azim]

Someone reading this... would think that there are at least "two kinds of randomness". One randomness produced by RNG's and another kind produced by roulettes...  How do we distinguish one from the other?

There is no difference.

[doola]

Someone reading this... would think that there are at least "two kinds of randomness". One randomness produced by RNG's and another kind produced by roulettes...  How do we distinguish one from the other?

There is no difference.

Agreed, except when the casino has rigged the RNG. Which I don't care what anyone says, does happen.  Heads in sand on this does not mean it doesn't happen.  Too many coincidences.

[nottophammer]

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=631.msg5504#msg5504

Think reply 3 sums this one up