Vaddis Holy Grail

[Proofreaders2000]

One more idea bc why not 
==============================
These splits go together: Sum=37 mirrors

1/4, 33/36:             2/5, 32/35:       3/6, 31/34

7/10,27/30:          8/11, 26/29:      9/12, 25/28

13/16, 21/24:     14/17, 20/23:    15/18, 19/22
------------------------------------------------------------------
Procedure: Note the newest spin-value

Bet the last decision's split, Vaddi pair-and
the mirror compliment and opposite of Vaddi

pair plus Zero once. 
Stop on a win or after five consecutive misses.

Example: #2 (newest outcome)

Bet 2,5,3 & 32,35,34,0 once:      1.) 27(x)-7

Bet 27,30,28 & 7,10,9,0 once:    2.) 20(x)-7

Bet 20,23,21 & 14,17,13,0....

[ozon]

A few days ago I played something like that.
The pair was chosen so that after the repeater appeared, he played him and the first free higher number but only within first dozen. , all within 9 spins gap. This caused that we played a very small number of numbers.
So I played only repeaters showing in 9 gaps cycles, one more thing that I did was not to moving  out the pair after the hit, just trigger play through 9 spins, regardless of how many hits it was.
First, I played in sessions with hit target and stop lose.
But I wanted to check if there is any advantage in selection in a long session.

I played one 1000 spins sesion and the result was negative

[Proofreaders2000]

My new idea
==============================
Note the newest Red outcome and the newest Black
outcome.  Bet those two and their respective Vaddi pairs. 

*If zero shows bet the newest two
outcomes and their respective pairs,

Stop on a win or after nine consecutive misses.

Example: 21,35 (newest spin-value)

Bet 21,22 & 35,36:    1.) 0(x)-4

Bet 0,1 & 35,36....

[Elite]

Ok!

You ask me to choose between a gambler's fallacy and another...

I'd say to remove the older is better? Because you would miss most of the ones repeating quickly, and I guess it's easier to track, overall a smaller backtrack range.

I did a test a week or two ago to find the statitstics of the position gap of the very first number to hit for a x-time.
Look at the following results, for almost 4000 game starts:


For example, let's take the first number to hit for a third time.
You can see on the left, when it hits for the third time, it had hit on average 6.33 numbers ago ( mostly 6.33 spins ago, unless there was a quick repeater in between).  Median: half the time was before 5 spins, other half was it later.
On the right, there were on average 4.43 nrs that had hit twice before the third hitter came.  The higher the x-peater, the lesser there were nrs with equal hits.

Position of the first x-peater.  Graphically represented:


Serie1 represents  how many y-times the first repeater hit x-nrs later.
Serie2: how many y-times the first nr to hit for a third time appeared x-numbers ago.
Etc.
We see: in 3909 games starts, the first repeater was on position1 ( back-to-back hit) 767 times, so 19.62%
First 3-peater was on position1 493 times, so 12.61%.

It smoothens out as are calculated the stats for ever higher x-peaters.

I guess you could say that a narrow range is more likely to hit fast repeater.

P.S. : But I think the cost for a hit will still hover around 37 units...

micro analysis, superb,

[Mako]

micro analysis, superb,

Yes, quite impressive Ben, always enjoy your data dumps.   

[Proofreaders2000]

A digital dictionary of information.  Props.

The challenge is to take those "words" and make complete
thoughts.  That is what creating an effective system is all about.

[Proofreaders2000]

New idea
==============================
---*Last Three Unique singles "Pivot" system*---

Procedure: Note the last
three outcomes.  Are they unique?

Qualifier: Which of the last two outcomes is
Higher, the decision before last or the last decision?

If the last decision is numerically Higher bet the last three
outcomes and the next Higher respective number once.

If the decision before last is numerically Higher than the last decision bet the last three
outcomes and the numerically respective lower number on all three outcomes once.

Repeat steps for each new spin-value. 
Stop on a win or after six consecutive misses.

Example: 21,34,5 (newest spin-value)-three unique singles

#34,5-the two numbers are descending.

Bet 21,20:     34,33:     5,4 once:     1.) 17(x)-6

#5,17-the two numbers are ascending.

Bet 34,35:     5,6:     17,18 once....

[Elite]

Hi proof. We have to consider 24/8 and 12/4 also. Repeaters average if average got achieved what we have to look next.. My view is if 12/4.  We hit 2 then we need to reset.. As if 2 hits within 12 numbers. We will b in profit...

[Elite]

When do repeaters hit in average.. That point too.. After 4 numbers  how they connect each other and based on drop numbers to predict sleepers./ future drops...so in that case if we do reset cycle then we will always different  kind cycle.. Some hits repeater early and some hits repeaters after 14 spins... Based on falling numbers accordingly bets need to adjusted  to get benefit  with in 24 spins... My view only

[Proofreaders2000]

Thanks for that Elite.  I will look at it.
==============================
Test: Dublinbet European Wheel #1-
Sunday, February 24,2019 @ 8:42pm CST USA

...6,27,17 (newest spin-value)-descending

Bet 6,5:     27,26:     17,16:        1.) 17(win)+30
==============================
Test: Intertops Red Casino American Wheel-
Sunday, February 24,2019 @ 8:49pm CST USA

...20,4,30 (newest spin-value)-ascending

Bet 20,21:     4,5:     30,31:        1.) 31(win)+30

[Elite]

I tried pairing chart in  xls. 1 3 5  in top row  and 2 4 6 etc in below row with colours black  red. Pairing I got is same as Modi  system..in same line. While vaadi pairs sits in next row..  Vaadi pair is for sleeper.. Modi pair is for  single to double..... Let's do more analyze keeping balance in mind

[Elite]

0 excluded... If zero map to 1.i m analysing if out of balance cycle how to take advantage as per vad.he uses 24/ 8 and 12/4 for this

[Elite]

Repeater gameplay fails if out of balance cycle.. As per vaadi if it happens  he take advantage..... Gosh..... This I guess missing in our gameplay. With balance cycle 12/4 and 24/8  repeater gameplay wins. It looses only if balance out..... I guess time to find pigeons in their holes...and pigeons live together.. My thought only

[Elite]

What about if pigeon fly from same nest.... Or its neighbour fly first.... 2nd case more need to test... Pigeons gave to come back their nest.. Some early some later... What about friendly ones........testing...   

[Proofreaders2000]

Inspired by Elite just now 
==============================
Track until you have eight
consecutive unique singles. (qualifier)

Bet the last decision in a stepped sequence.

Stop on a win or after eight consecutive misses.

Example: 21,3,0,4,17,34,7,19 (newest spin-value)-qualifier

Bet #19:           1.) 28(x)-1

Bet 19,28:        2.) 15(x)-2

Bet 19,28,15....