Vaddis Holy Grail

[evs]

CELESCLIFF  you're wrong! what makes you think that?

[Let Me Win]

No, he is not wrong.

It's not open to debate or argument.
It is a stone cold fact.

If YOU don't agree then the problem is YOUR chimpanzee level of intelligence.

Every maths teacher at every school in every country would all spit in your face with utter contempt should they hear you disagree in person.

[evs]

please confirm your words with mathematical facts! and do not knock on the keyboard as one of the monkeys who are forced to do it in the hope that they will copy one of the great books!

[celescliff]

evs, perhaps you can explain why we are wrong about that instead?

[evs]

I can! but first correctly formulate it and publish it on one of the mathematical forums. after receiving your reply, please send it here. Maybe someone will be ashamed. Don't be afraid to waste time looking for the right answers. Don't be lazy!

[celescliff]

I can! but first correctly formulate it and publish it on one of the mathematical forums. after receiving your reply, please send it here. Maybe someone will be ashamed. Don't be afraid to waste time looking for the right answers. Don't be lazy!

Why not do that yourself? The only one that will be ashamed is you.

Why should i waste my time when i know I'm right?

[evs]

CELESCLIFF  you're wrong! what makes you think that?

You behave incorrectly I asked the first question! Give an explanation as you understand. Then I will.

[Let Me Win]

1) entry and or exit points are completely useless, the math doesn't change regardless of when you start or stop.

1a) "triggers" on when to bet are useless. (see above)

2) changing tables, changing casinos is useless, it's a math game.

3) Hit and run (basically all of the above combined) is useless.
The run from hell or the amazing run from heaven where you win every spin can happen as soon as you stop playing.
You HAVE to formulate a way to play every spin.

4) Past spins are useless - each spin is independent. This doesn't mean much unless you are tracking spins, waiting for x,y and/or z to happen before you start playing. Which you shouldn't be doing.

Analogy - a scientist is going into a room flooded with radiation.
According to this way of thinking - you can jump in the room and then jump out 30 seconds later and you'll likely be ok.
You can do this once per day for months......... and you'll die.

Another scientist goes into the same room and stays there - he dies. Yep, doesn't really matter - one dies sooner than the other but the end result is that they are both dead.

Prolonging the event doesn't stop it from happening - and it doesn't make the time spent waiting for it to happen because you popped in and out of the room any less appealing.

[evs]

1) entry and or exit points are completely useless, the math doesn't change regardless of when you start or stop.

1a) "triggers" on when to bet are useless. (see above)

2) changing tables, changing casinos is useless, it's a math game.

3) Hit and run (basically all of the above combined) is useless.
The run from hell or the amazing run from heaven where you win every spin can happen as soon as you stop playing.
You HAVE to formulate a way to play every spin.

4) Past spins are useless - each spin is independent. This doesn't mean much unless you are tracking spins, waiting for x,y and/or z to happen before you start playing. Which you shouldn't be doing.

Analogy - a scientist is going into a room flooded with radiation.
According to this way of thinking - you can jump in the room and then jump out 30 seconds later and you'll likely be ok.
You can do this once per day for months......... and you'll die.

Another scientist goes into the same room and stays there - he dies. Yep, doesn't really matter - one dies sooner than the other but the end result is that they are both dead.

Prolonging the event doesn't stop it from happening - and it doesn't make the time spent waiting for it to happen because you popped in and out of the room any less appealing.

Almost all agree with you !
But the connection to the whole already implies the past!

[celescliff]

evs, learn a programming language or atleast learn rx and code your system.

Get a bunch of spins and first run all the spins in one long term session.

Next, run there same spins again but this time use a win and stop loss and add one to each session you won and lost.

Now look and compare the result in the statictics and look at the net %.

What do you think the result will be and why?

[evs]

Difficulties with the translation!
As I understand it:
1)Generate a random sequence (0;1)
2)We divide the random sequence into parts (some of which we can throw out and insert similar ones from another random sequence)
Am I right?
ANSWER: the ratio (0) and (1) will not change.

[Proofreaders2000]

@ProofRead
instead of 36 ,try  12 numbers on a paper with 3 sets ,like 1,2,3,4 in one set, and so on, apply law of third and see how to manage balance.

Turns out your suggestion is a good idea 
==============================
Procedure: Separate the table into numerical sets of four:

A.) 1,2,3,4                        B.) 5,6,7,8                       C.) 9,10,11,12

D.) 13,14,15,16               E.) 17,18,19,20               F.) 21,22,23,24

G.) 25,26,27,28               H.) 29,30,31,32               I.) 33,34,35,36
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note the last non-zero outcome,  Bet the four
number group containing the LD number once.

Example: #30 (newest spin-value)

Bet H.) (29,30,31,32) once:    1.) 13(x)-4

Bet D.) (13,14,15,16) once....

*If zero shows re-bet the last bet
Stop on a win or after nine consecutive misses.

[benis71]

Proof,this is your Holy Grail?

[Proofreaders2000]

Nope.  Just looking at Elite's idea

[Bigbroben]

I m seeing some light in dark.VAD is genius  .magic number is for sure not 8

I am open to discussion!  Why not 8 as the magic nr?

How did you get to this opinion?