Vaddis Holy Grail

[ddarko]

rg u claiim that iam not willing to share mu system , but i ve done it with my 2 deleted posts , at least i started and was willing to go on further [ perhaps not the whole concept but very helpfull infos about it] to open up your eyes , but the moderators decide that iwas in wrong direction , i respect their experience but with mr they ve made a mistake , the time will show ...........the next time i will ask their permission first ....

that is just a big fat lie.......

[helena]

But it's flatbet.  That makes it interesting.  The curve looks like a progression play...........but it's not.

I agree, it is very very interesting.  I have had a few sessions go south very fast though and they didn't recover like most do, which is why I say there will be losing sessions.  A stop loss will be required if you just use the first phase only.

[doola]

Been playing with this to and trying to work it all out and think I am getting a handle on it.  The two phases are useful, but you have to be prepared for some loses.

The winning sessions will either come straight away or lose within 24 spins and you will struggle to recover the losing sessions. Even though this is flat betting it acts like a progression when losing and loses fast.

[MrJ]

rg u claiim that iam not willing to share mu system , but i ve done it with my 2 deleted posts , at least i started and was willing to go on further [ perhaps not the whole concept but very helpfull infos about it] to open up your eyes , but the moderators decide that iwas in wrong direction , i respect their experience but with mr they ve made a mistake , the time will show ...........the next time i will ask their permission first ....

Not modS, I deleted those two. Post the ENTIRE method or nothing, no hinting around. Thats the one RULE I appreciate Steve standing by us mods.

Ken

[helena]

last night I followed Vaddi's instructions and played repeaters only. .........................Flatbetting.
Results look promissing.

Here is a losing session played with repeaters only.
Text file of numbers is attached as well to see if you get a different result to mine.

[helena]

Here is the same session playing it the way I interpreted Vaddi's clues, this one is a winning session.

[eddy35]

Here is the same session playing it the way I interpreted Vaddi's clues, this one is a winning session.

And how do you interpret Vaddi's clues?  Just wondering!

[helena]

If all 8 numbers in phase 1 miss I am -36, so I play phase 2 with all 8 missed numbers and thier pairs until I get a hit, dropping the oldest number and it's pair each time.  As soon as I get back to +ve using phase 2 I go back to phase 1.  Simple but it works 9 times out of 10.

Remember Vaddi said only play 37 spin sessions if you can, longer will just have a rollercoaster effect on bankroll.

[eddy35]

If all 8 numbers in phase 1 miss I am -36, so I play phase 2 with all 8 missed numbers and thier pairs until I get a hit, dropping the oldest number and it's pair each time.  As soon as I get back to +ve using phase 2 I go back to phase 1.  Simple but it works 9 times out of 10.

Remember Vaddi said only play 37 spin sessions if you can, longer will just have a rollercoaster effect on bankroll.

And do you play 1 unit on both? ( numner + pairs) or 1 unit on the split?

[nottophammer]

Helena
The 136 spin test
At spin 9  -36, if you rebet the last 8 and double the bet, spin 10 is #6, so -52, rebet the last 8 for 16 again spin 11 is #6,so 68 units in total return 72, +4.
Now start with last # for 1 unit, if you carried on this way of betting at spin 21 +42.

[RFMAXX]

If all 8 numbers in phase 1 miss I am -36, so I play phase 2 with all 8 missed numbers and thier pairs until I get a hit, dropping the oldest number and it's pair each time.  As soon as I get back to +ve using phase 2 I go back to phase 1.  Simple but it works 9 times out of 10.

Remember Vaddi said only play 37 spin sessions if you can, longer will just have a rollercoaster effect on bankroll.

i tested it that way...but more losing sessions than winners.
stage 1 and 2 was the early stage. then vaddi said, that 1 % is missing and we have to change one thing on the table layout.

so my latest test involve streets.

but no luck either...played the streets of the last 8 unhit numbers...wheel layout and table layout...or just the last 4 unhit number streets crossing out the last and bet every new street...
it goes down...

[helena]

Helena
The 136 spin test
At spin 9  -36, if you rebet the last 8 and double the bet, spin 10 is #6, so -52, rebet the last 8 for 16 again spin 11 is #6,so 68 units in total return 72, +4.
Now start with last # for 1 unit, if you carried on this way of betting at spin 21 +42.

That is using a progression, this is all about flat betting.

[helena]

i tested it that way...but more losing sessions than winners.
stage 1 and 2 was the early stage. then vaddi said, that 1 % is missing and we have to change one thing on the table layout.

so my latest test involve streets.

but no luck either...played the streets of the last 8 unhit numbers...wheel layout and table layout...or just the last 4 unhit number streets crossing out the last and bet every new street...
it goes down...

Yes before he told everyone about pairs, that changed everything.  Read his clues again. You really need to look at the fall of the numbers in a spreadsheet, he got it right about balance.

Streets didn't work for me either.

EDIT:  If I am in front before 37 spins are up I quit the session and start another 20+ spins or so into the numbers.  I haven't played this live yet, but testing has been very good.

[Proofreaders2000]

This sounds like Mr. J's Eight Train with the repeaters.

[nottophammer]

got these numbers yesterday in ladbrokes
Helena does Vaddis work here
9
14
16
18
2
34
15
33
29
11
27
36
20
10
30
26
23
0
32
6
25