Vaddis Holy Grail

[Proofreaders2000]

It just occurred to me this:

Track until you get eight uniques..bet once.

If miss repeat tracking a new eight uniques, repeat.

Boring maybe, but Bankroll friendly.

[The General]

It just occurred to me this:

Track until you get eight uniques..bet once.

If miss repeat tracking a new eight uniques, repeat.

Boring maybe, but Bankroll friendly.

Why do you need to wait for eight unique?  Why can't you just make up the "eight unique" numbers at random?

[Proofreaders2000]

Just following part of Vaddi's instructions

If just choosing any random numbers worked it would
defeat the original purpose of the Roulette wheel.

[evs]

 bday.tMax.dist.cum(38)#38 Roulette numbers
Time difference of 0.009552002 secs
[1] "for 38 items, mean:8.4088 "
          Draw X    Draw X Prob     cumulative: (X or less)
[1,]            1            0                0           
[2,]            2 0.026315789474   0.026315789474         
[3,]            3 0.051246537396   0.07756232687         
[4,]            4 0.072824026826   0.1503863537           
[5,]            5 0.0894330154     0.2398193691           
[6,]            6 0.10002376722    0.33984313632         
[7,]            7 0.10423529427    0.44407843059         
[8,]            8 0.10240660489    0.54648503548         
[9,]            9 0.095476834636   0.64196187011         
[10,]           10 0.084798504447   0.72676037456         
[11,]           11 0.071905164589   0.79866553915         
[12,]           12 0.058281028141   0.85694656729         
[13,]           13 0.045174768224   0.90212133551         
[14,]           14 0.033484806271   0.93560614179         
[15,]           15 0.023724053026   0.95933019481         
[16,]           16 0.016053870469   0.97538406528         
[17,]           17 0.010364604092   0.98574866937         
[18,]           18 0.0063755952804  0.99212426465         
[19,]           19 0.0037306114799  0.99585487613         
[20,]           20 0.0020725619333  0.99792743807         
[21,]           21 0.0010908220701  0.99901826014         
[22,]           22 0.00054254045067 0.99956080059         
[23,]           23 0.00025427334405 0.99981507393         
[24,]           24 0.00011192893614 0.99992700287         
[25,]           25 4.6103451955e-05 0.99997310632         
[26,]           26 1.7693210729e-05 0.99999079953         
[27,]           27 6.2950581329e-06 0.99999709459         
[28,]           28 2.0643712905e-06 0.99999915896         
[29,]           29 6.1971379872e-07 0.99999977867         
[30,]           30 1.6890695642e-07 0.99999994758         
[31,]           31 4.1383737053e-08 0.99999998896         
[32,]           32 9.0027778853e-09 0.99999999797         
[33,]           33 1.7119034349e-09 0.99999999968         
[34,]           34 2.787474343e-10  0.99999999996         
[35,]           35 3.7788727138e-11            1           <<<<too lazy to make this more accurate!
[36,]           36 4.0947537147e-12            1           
[37,]           37 3.3250631668e-13            1           
[38,]           38 1.7986452803e-14            1           
[39,]           39 4.8612034602e-16            1   

almost forgot sim data
1 million sets of 8 spins
results from 0 repeats to 1 to 6
      group        middle     freq  freq/100
--------------------------------------------
-0.5 <= x < 0.50     0.00   453851    45.39%
0.50 <= x < 1.50     1.00   409193    40.92%
1.50 <= x < 2.50     2.00   121785    12.18%
2.50 <= x < 3.50     3.00    14465     1.45%
3.50 <= x < 4.50     4.00      693     0.07%
4.50 <= x < 5.50     5.00       12     0.00%
5.50 <= x < 6.50     6.00        1     0.00%

[evs]

THE GENERAL  I have long been know it.

[evs]

[evs]

we must not forget about the variance!

[Scarface]

Do you mean a first repeater to hit from spins 9 to 16, or you mean the spin gap between the 2 occurences of a repeating nr?

Average nr of repeaters from spin 9 to 16?  Should be easy to find.

P.S.  "Follow what the wheel does".  Are you thinking of following the wheel but not from too close, like 9 spins (or any other) behind?

Average # of repeaters from spin 9-16

[Bigbroben]

You know I could give you a short answer and say: about 2,1   but I'll dissect this shorg answer in a long one once I get to my computer and my mistress Excel!

[Irish88]

Well with all of Nottos hard work it seems to work this way:

Spins 1-10  1 repeat
Spins 11-20 3 repeats
Spins 21-30 5 repeats
Spins 31-40 7 repeats

[junscissorhands]

Wrong, wrong, wrong.

That thread on MM has been there for so many bloody years. I simply cannot believe the majority here can't even decode such simple clues. Maybe it's time to stop digging and pack your bags because  this is simply going nowhere.

[Bigbroben]

You know I could give you a short answer and say: about 2,1   but I'll dissect this shorg answer in a long one once I get to my computer and my mistress Excel!

Here, results of 8109 cycles with random.org nrs:

Amount of repeaters from spin 9 to 16:

Min: 0
Max: 7
Average: 2,166
Median: 2

Distribution:


Short answer long.

[The General]

[quote author = junscissorhands link = topic = 15824.msg208560 # msg208560 date = 1534837604]
Wrong, wrong, wrong.

That thread on MM has been there for so many bloody years. I simply can not believe the majority here can not even decode such simple clues. Maybe it's time to stop digging and pack your bags because this is simply going nowhere.
[/ quote]

Each one has discovered it in their own way, because you think that your way of seeing it is the one that fulfills the one of vaddis? I found my way about vaddis, but now I am getting beyond knowing something like the dovecot principle, which is a very powerful weapon to solve problems and it seems that it is something related to the because of the vaddis.
But you because you think what you do about vaddis is right and what we see the rest is not?
Show results or do some tests that are visible for everyone to see.
regards

Clues huh?

It's like searching for clues to make a box of stupid work.

[Herby]

now I am getting beyond knowing something like the dovecot principle, which is a very powerful weapon to solve problems

Hi PassionRuleta ,
please show us one problem that you were able to solve  with the dovecot principle.
Thank you very much.

[Proofreaders2000]

Hey guys   New idea to try
==============================
Single number builder system with a twist

Start by betting #0 as the first number.
(Also bet single #0 on the American wheel as a start)

As each number shows bet that number along with the last one

Example:  Bet #0:     1.) #22

Bet 0,22:                    2.) #13

Bet 0,22,13...

**if there is a hit during the singles builder
portion restart with #0 bet or end session (if in profit)

If you get to eight numbers in play bet zero and the last seven
newest outcomes (eight numbers in play) continuously until in profit.

Bankroll suggestion: 132 units