Vaddis Holy Grail

[nichedelico]

Great work Sparks! And what you think about the last clue of Vaddi?

"La Bomba:

Options:

1) 2 chips on doubles

2) 1 chip on doubles

3) Half of a chip on doubles

2) and 3) should make you smile. Smiley"

La bomba it's an italian word, on facebook there is a guy named David Banton (Vaddi-David) with pics in LasVegas, with an (private?) elicopter that use 1-2 italians word on pics description.

[Bigbroben]

Yep... after 250 spins this is looking very much like what PR posted.

Now for the long term testing... i'll look at doing that later tonight.

You reset the nrs played on a hit or on a new high?

[buffalowizard]

Sorry i don't know,haven't followed the back story of the whole Vaddi thing. So what makes everyone think he had the grail and not just another charlatan offering bread crumbs and bogus claims? 90+pages suggests there was at least some evidence of something!?

[Bigbroben]

Oh, it's probably a) a too early HG call;  b) a teaser.

It's a good debate subject, though.!

[Bigbroben]

Sparks,

what do you think of this one?

[nichedelico]

And another though, if we bet the first stage also? 1-2-3...8 and if no double or pairs hit stop the bet wait for the Sparks conditions and start again with betting?

[Bigbroben]

It only focuses on the step2 process describes as you did last page: play reps and pairs in last x-spins ( adjustable values in blue).  It does not include Vaddi's escalating step1 process.
Although Excel random, many times a +36u score is achieved, which would représent a recovery of a failed step1 ( if 8 nrs).

Not bad.  It works until it doesn't!  Could include a maximal spins til recovery then reset, or other parameters...

[Sparks]

Sparks,

what do you think of this one?

I'll have a look once I'm back home. But from what i can see on my phone some tweaks might need to be made.

I'll let you know when I've had a proper look

[Sparks]

You reset the nrs played on a hit or on a new high?

Complete reset on a hit. So start tracking numbers from fresh spins.

I haven't seen a it lose more than about 20units so far

[Sparks]

And another though, if we bet the first stage also? 1-2-3...8 and if no double or pairs hit stop the bet wait for the Sparks conditions and start again with betting?

I've never been a fan of this. I know it's part of Vaddis method and if it hits early it can be a good earner but from what I've experienced it doesn't hit often and when it doesn't you're immediately on the back foot trying to regain losses.
If i can incorporate it in to this method i will do but only when I'm certain what I have discovered is perfected

[Sparks]

And another though, if we bet the first stage also? 1-2-3...8 and if no double or pairs hit stop the bet wait for the Sparks conditions and start again with betting?

I've never been a fan of this. I know it's part of Vaddis method and if it hits early it can be a good earner but from what I've experienced it doesn't hit often and when it doesn't you're immediately on the back foot trying to regain losses.
If i can incorporate it in to this method i will do but only when I'm certain what I have discovered is perfected

[nichedelico]

I've tried manually like this, 1-8 classic first stage, then, if not winning, star bet like Sparks way pairs or double but with half of a chip for every number (i think that recover the 1 stage loss and it's like we start with the second stage only), delete numbers when goes out of 8 range. From 25 euro to 103 with 10 cent, but i don't know it's only thougt. Sparks i think your way of interpreting Vaddi's clue it's really really great.

[Sparks]

I've tried manually like this, 1-8 classic first stage, then, if not winning, star bet like Sparks way pairs or double but with half of a chip for every number (i think that recover the 1 stage loss and it's like we start with the second stage only), delete numbers when goes out of 8 range. From 25 euro to 103 with 10 cent, but i don't know it's only thougt. Sparks i think your way of interpreting Vaddi's clue it's really really great.

Thanks nichedelico. I've been looking  at this for a while with no luck and it's only from Passions last post that the light bulb appeared. So it's thanks to him for helping with his tips

[nasty]

I've tried manually like this, 1-8 classic first stage, then, if not winning, star bet like Sparks way pairs or double but with half of a chip for every number (i think that recover the 1 stage loss and it's like we start with the second stage only), delete numbers when goes out of 8 range. From 25 euro to 103 with 10 cent, but i don't know it's only thougt. Sparks i think your way of interpreting Vaddi's clue it's really really great.

So did u play his first version with "4 oldest and the pairs of the 4 new ones" or his "new idea" with betting on pairs and doubles within 8 spins? What do you mean with deleting numbers when goes out of 8 range?

I mean Big's excel showed that unfortunately it's a typical it works until ... :/

[nichedelico]

So did u play his first version with "4 oldest and the pairs of the 4 new ones" or his "new idea" with betting on pairs and doubles within 8 spins? What do you mean with deleting numbers when goes out of 8 range?

I mean Big's excel showed that unfortunately it's a typical it works until ... :/

Play with his new idea, (after classic 1 stage) when one of the pairs or repeaters goes out of the  8 numbers on the marquee i delete the bet, so track always only the last 8 numbers. Like 23 - 2 - 7 - 15 - 0 - 23 - 8 - 34,  number 23 and 7-8 are in game, with one chip on them and one in the split for each one, 36 hit, delete bet on 23 and leave 7-8 and so on