Vaddis Holy Grail

[Proofreaders2000]

Hey Jono1167 Vaddi said no progressions in his notes.

Also a session imo should not last more
than 40 spins-after that cut your losses.

(A bot can go 200+ spins, but at a B&M abt 40 spins is the max per session)

*The fewer spins the better bc H.E

[Proofreaders2000]

*The fewer spins it takes to get in profit the better.

[jono1167]

Hey Jono1167 Vaddi said no progressions in his notes.

Also a session imo should not last more
than 40 spins-after that cut your losses.

(A bot can go 200+ spins, but at a B&M abt 40 spins is the max per session)

*The fewer spins the better bc H.E

Hi Proof - I tend to agree. Even a mild progression can quickly spiral out of control. Anyway, the system was actually performing pretty well without a progression....

[Bigbroben]

So you went into prog only 14 times out of 93, right?  So 20 spins at 2u and 4 spins at 3u per nr.
Flat would have won alzo, although less.

On my side its not all rosy...

[jono1167]

So you went into prog only 14 times out of 93, right?  So 20 spins at 2u and 4 spins at 3u per nr.
Flat would have won alzo, although less.

On my side its not all rosy...

Hi Ben

I only started using the progression about a third of the way into the test.

The progression was only used at levels 9 and 10.

Miss at level 9 = 36 unit loss.  With progression =16 unit loss.
Miss at level 10 = 54 unit loss.  With progression =34 unit loss.

The whole idea of introducing a progression was not to turn a loss into a profit, but to soften the loss....

I'm devastated Ben, I was going to throw in my job after seeing the chart you posted this morning!  It is a great idea, I'm sure it can be tweaked....

[Bigbroben]

I feel your method is more stable/balanced.  Dont give it up!
The one I'm doing right not is just a second test, nothing refined, and concentrates only on pairs.  I get repeaters like crazy sometimes and I'd be right beside...

Anyway, 300 spins now and stable at +139.  First test I did went -450 below high and had recovered.  Since it was a test I just went on and saw that it held.

Same with this one here.  Will continue in odrer to test thouroughly.

P.S.  You checked if your numbers went from 0 to 36?  Happened to me with Excel once, thought I had it...

[Bigbroben]

Throwing the towel on that one.  New lows!

Just pairs is no good, got repeaters dropping often on a short range and I wasn't there.

NEXT!

[Proofreaders2000]

New idea

Note the newest outcome.  Which
is dominant High or Low outcomes?

If the Last decision is High (and High is
dominant) bet the last six High outcomes.

If the last decision is Low (and High is
dominant) bet the Vaddi pairs of the High outcomes.

and vice versa

If the last decision is Low (and Low is
dominant) bet the last six Low outcomes.

If the last decision is Low (and High is
dominant) bet the last High Vaddi pairs.

*Max six numbers in play

Example: 21,30,9,34,19,4,26,36 (newest spin-value)

High is dominant.  Bet last six High outcomes once:    1.) 3(x)-6

Bet last six High Vaddi pairs: 0,27,20,35,31,22

*Zero is neutral-bet zero either way

Stop on a win or after six consecutive misses.

[jono1167]

P.S.  You checked if your numbers went from 0 to 36?  Happened to me with Excel once, thought I had it...

Sorry, Ben, what did you mean by this? I have to admit, my maths is fairly patchy at the best of times....

I should mention I will test the next 500 spins on a different roulette simulator app. 

[Bigbroben]

Steady rising curves are suspicious.  When I see these, I know I made an error coding.  But if you use an app, I take for granted they've double-checked.

[jono1167]

Steady rising curves are suspicious.  When I see these, I know I made an error coding.  But if you use an app, I take for granted they've double-checked.

That's right, I'm just using a roulette simulator app. All manual. One spin at a time. Old fashioned!

[Proofreaders2000]

One more for the road
==============================
Procedure: Track the last 12
spins.  Which is dominant, Red or Black?

Locate eight dominant color outcomes and start
from the oldest a stepped Black/Red sequence.

*Zero is neutral.  If a zero is present add
it to the stepped sequence either way.

Stop on a win or at a drawdown of -36 units.

Example: 12,3,29,5,35,14,27,1,17,2,34,9 (newest spin-value)

Red is dominant-start the sequence.

Bet #12:    1.) 23(x)-1

Bet 12,3:    2.) 0(x)-2

Bet 12,3,5....

[Gitano]

Guys,
First thought: obviously repeaters need to be taken in considerations, otherwise they kill the game, a circle always need to repeat;
Second : I don't use roulette simulator because I don't play on roulette simulator or rng online, it's too much random; for me the right one is an airball that I consider different from an RNG, and should be better either in a real live roulette..speed live or similar.

Jetbull casino have an airball live for fun without registration.

Question: do you study to beat the roulette at all , or only to win sometime some units ?

BR

[Proofreaders2000]

Do you study to beat the roulette at all-Gitano or only to win sometime some units ?

Only to win some units.  The casinos (at least the online casinos I've played at) won't
let you win too much (they take Live Roulette away) and only allow RNG Roulette.

[Robbert]

A little of topic,

But is anyone willing to code a simple system in rx for me?

PM me.

Sorry for disrupting the topic, continu!