• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Vaddis Holy Grail

Started by RFMAXX, Aug 20, 03:35 AM 2015

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 49 Guests are viewing this topic.

Proofreaders2000

"La Bomba" made me money Bigbroben  :thumbsup: hats off

Bigbroben

La Bomba refered to the " 2u on doubles, 1u.on double or half unit on doubles".  This is what you have done?  How did you apply it?
Life is hard, and then you die.
Mes pensées sont le dernier retranchement de ma liberté.

jono1167

Quote from: Bigbroben on Feb 23, 12:45 AM 2019
Wow, the next step2 was intense.  Went down real quick.  As hits were going, I was removing ever closer numbers until I had to remove the one that just landed, that is, a 1 spin gap on the last nr.  Here, nr3.
Decided to stop the step2 even if no new high.  Prudent cuz I was playing more than 20 nrs.  Went up to 25 early in the step2.
Surprising rise at the end, coincidence or not?  To be continued.

I love the chart Ben! More great work. Please keep posting results.

jono1167

Quote from: luckyfella on Feb 22, 09:22 PM 2019
Played this on the casino floor. :lol:

Good for you!  Let us know if it goes belly-up. 😊

nichedelico

Great work Ben!!! I remember a Vaddi's clues that say if we play more than 18 numbers the system is not accurate, maybe a modification in this direction? And i'm curious about Proof answer for La Bomba!!

Proofreaders2000

I just tested Bigbroben's interpretation of three chips
on five numbers (except I bet a chip on all five numbers)

Re: Bet last decision, the two numbers numerically
less and two numerically higher than last decision.

Irish88

Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on Feb 23, 07:05 AM 2019
I just tested Bigbroben's interpretation of three chips
on five numbers (except I bet a chip on all five numbers)

Re: Bet last decision, the two numbers numerically
less and two numerically higher than last decision.


Proof, I can't seem to get the zip file opened. Are you playing 5, then 10 then 15 numbers? What is the max amount of numbers you play? If a number is already covered are you playing the next open number? Thank you Proof.

Proofreaders2000

Just playing five numbers from start to finish.

Stop on a win or after seven consecutive misses.
(Bankroll=35 units per session)

Each new outcome change the bet.

Proofreaders2000

Example: #20 (newest outcome)

Bet 18,19,20,21,22 once:   1.) #2(x)-5

Bet 0,1,2,3,4 once:               2.) #36(x)-5

Bet 34,35,36,0,1 once....

jono1167

Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on Feb 23, 11:56 AM 2019
Example: #20 (newest outcome)

Bet 18,19,20,21,22 once:   1.) #2(x)-5

Bet 0,1,2,3,4 once:               2.) #36(x)-5

Bet 34,35,36,0,1 once....
Nice work Proof. This will be straightforward to test.

nichedelico

I'm testing with this bet (La bomba? for me), and Ben rules, seems good!

Bigbroben

Holding...
Life is hard, and then you die.
Mes pensées sont le dernier retranchement de ma liberté.

jono1167


Bigbroben

 :smile:Thanks!

It's the same that continued.
Life is hard, and then you die.
Mes pensées sont le dernier retranchement de ma liberté.

Mako

Ben it's impressive you're doing this all against RNG.  It seems like the harder path to me, but for the majority of players who don't have access to local B & M chances or live wheels online, it's their only way.

Proof does real-wheel testing, it's a good balance in the thread.  :thumbsup:

-