Vaddis Holy Grail

[Still]

Bet the newest spin-value, the number numerically lower,

I just finished another test of 33,000 spins over 105 sessions of 314 each. 

In this test it was similar to my two previous, going 8 steps high, but this time i bet on the latest spin value plus the number numerically higher.   

In this test the average loss was 47.35 units per 314 spins, remarkably close to my estimate of exactly how much each session should lose, when the total betting volume is subject to house edge.  Again, this is with RandBetween(0,36) in Excel.   

Since a previous test indicated that it should not matter what the next sleeper is chosen, this test should also be valid for choosing a sleeper numerically lower than the latest spin.   

Anyway, this test showed me that trying to catch repeats early in the cycle, sacrificing bets on sleepers, appears to follow house edge, whereas just betting on sleepers alone, up to 8 steps, has so far appeared to offset the house 2.7% by it's own 2.7% for breakeven. 

This is not the same as what you are suggesting exactly, the difference being the other two bets on sleepers in the columns. 

[Gandhi]

AND ALWAYS USE REAL SPIN DATA

6th do you have any american wheel spins? would appreciate.

[nichedelico]

Guys, i think there are 2 clues from Vaddi that have insufficient attention.
:: 0 and 1 are the numbers that give balance to your bet
:: if you play over 18 numbers a system it's not accurate.
I'm trying with 0 and 1 always covered.

[Elite]

[quote author = Elite link = topic = 15824.msg223792 # msg223792 date = 1551361710]
HI passion, if able to see in those range will the system be completed or will it still need more?
[/ quote]

When you have a margin of 12 holes, 4 unique, play those 4 unique and their 4 paired, you will be playing 8 in a space of 12, 4 only that can repeat and 4 not left, that can come out.
Of 24, then the same but with 8 and of 36 the same but with 12.
I'm saying too many guys, I've probably said the most important thing to open everyone's mind, surely many will continue to say that I do not contribute anything, but I just contributed more than all the clues that are given in this forum, only with this comment.
I know they're going to get it, I just ask that the one who gets it, do not follow it openly in the forum but hundreds of people will know, whatever they discover they can talk about with me.
regards
Pasión Ruleta

Passion thanks for valuable info, much appreciated

[Elite]

wheel layout

HI 6th sense , is this layout needs to match with real spin and can get benefit from that tq?

[6th-sense]

this is a picture of the wheel just put into a table layout..this is the layout on the right side of ayks tracker ..i asked for this to be put in..at top of that tracker is T for table side and W for wheel side...this picture is the reference for that..

[Elite]

Guys, i think there are 2 clues from Vaddi that have insufficient attention.
:: 0 and 1 are the numbers that give balance to your bet
:: if you play over 18 numbers a system it's not accurate.
I'm trying with 0 and 1 always covered.

i dont think so friend

[jono1167]

Playing the usual way again.

500 spins, 82 units profit. Flat bet. (84 betting strings).

Not the greatest game, but still....

I’m looking for a game with a 500 plus unit loss. It hasn’t happened yet.

Maybe time to start testing new ideas.

[Proofreaders2000]

New idea

Track for eight consecutive unique singles.  Bet the Vaddi pair for
all eight for four spins, changing the bet with each new spin-value.

Example: 21,3,19,34,7,2,23,0 (newest spin-value)

Bet 22,4,20,35,8,3,24,1:    1.) 16(x)-8

Bet 4,20,35,8,3,24,1,17....

[Bigbroben]

Thats a good one Proof, I'd be curious to see how it goes.

[Bigbroben]

Playing the usual way again.

500 spins, 82 units profit. Flat bet. (84 betting strings).

Not the greatest game, but still....

I’m looking for a game with a 500 plus unit loss. It hasn’t happened yet.

Maybe time to start testing new ideas.

Jono, by any chance, did you notice something when the major downslopes happened?  Like repeaters hitting like crazy, or landing always 1 nr further than you played, or anything?

[Proofreaders2000]

By observation there is usually one repeat single in a set of 12 outcomes.

That said, it looks like the repeater Even Chance attributes are the focus.

Example: 12,3,24,12 (newest spin-value)-Red,Low,Even

So look for a repeat single among the opposite uniques: Black, High, Odd

[Proofreaders2000]

So a bet may look like this:

Two chips on the twice hit single, and a
bet on the last six newest unique singles.

Changing the bet with each new spin-value.

Maybe a half-chip on the opposite
repeater attributes of the unique singles.

[Proofreaders2000]

Alright two units on the twice hit repeater and a Vaddi pair
and the two newest uniques and their respective Vaddi pairs.

(seven numbers in play)

[jono1167]

Jono, by any chance, did you notice something when the major downslopes happened?  Like repeaters hitting like crazy, or landing always 1 nr further than you played, or anything?

You said it Ben. The downslopes coincided with repeaters hitting like crazy.

When repeaters started happening, all momentum was lost.