• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Vaddis Holy Grail

Started by RFMAXX, Aug 20, 03:35 AM 2015

Previous topic - Next topic

Term3211 and 20 Guests are viewing this topic.

nottophammer

As another clue, I suggest that you create a stepping sequence (like above) wherein if you hit the last number in that sequence, you will break even.
1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8
As the Bago said over at GF. So, 8
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

nottophammer

Again, from RFMAXX page 1.
Because you are in profit and because you have not reached your X number limit of 10, you will continue the process all over again, by placing a unit chip on your last dropped number, which is 13. You will continue this process of betting on every number that drops.

Now, as I've said, "The X number is important" and it's not 10 .

So, not number 10.
Vaddi was like the General on a fishing expediton
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

nottophammer

I'll post an image, the image is about 60 spins.
The spins are posted by Ignatus, live German spins.
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

nottophammer

Look at spins 1-10
The question is when does that 1st repeat happen; where on average?

Have you seen luck of the Irish data on this forum?
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

nottophammer

This is a test I did in November.  I tested over 1 million single zero RNG spins and got this:

2    3210
3    6251
4    9017
5    10906
6    12398
7    12852
8    12454
9    11478
10    10007
11    8619
12    6845
13    5243
14    3857
15    2730
16    1816
17    1128
18    687
19    355
20    246
21    96
22    61
23    29
24    16
25    5
26    3
27    0
28    0
29    0
30    0
31    0
32    0
33    0
34    0
35    0
36    0

The most unique numbers in a row was 25 (The 26 means it hit on the 26th spin, so 25 unique numbers in a row) and this happened only 3 times.

Can you see
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx

NOTTO can i have that 1 million on txt document if its easy for you?

6th-sense

you sure thats a 1 million spin test?   number counts add up to 120299...or am i reading it wrong

ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx


nottophammer

wow; even the General aka DSAA can get this.
How about 1'004'251
How many times did 25 numbers repeat on 26th spin? 3
So, 78 spins
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

6th-sense

Quote from: nottophammer on Jan 18, 12:31 PM 2022
wow; even the General aka DSAA can get this.
How about 1'004'251
How many times did 25 numbers repeat on 26th spin? 3
So, 78 spins

aha the penny has dropped

nottophammer

So, do people always understand what's posted.
Another post of luck of the Irish
Here are some great stats from a poster called Teorulte

I thought they were relevant to Colbsters post

I ran about 500 000 cycles of 37 spins and came up with the following:

(Number on left is number of unique numbers and next number is how many times a spin cycle had exactly that many unique numbers in the test)

37 spin cycle:

15   1
16   12
17   202
18   1417
19   6020
20   18309
21   41304
22   73951
23   98780
24   102814
25   80164
26   47276
27   20934
28   6706
29   1685
30   349
31   35
32   5

Is this not law of the third or as DSAA would say flaw of the third
So, there's the 24
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

nottophammer

So, Jpeg Vaddi 20000
Do you see what happens on average in 1st 10 spins.
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

6th-sense

Quote from: nottophammer on Jan 18, 01:20 PM 2022
So, do people always understand what's posted.
Another post of luck of the Irish
Here are some great stats from a poster called Teorulte

I thought they were relevant to Colbsters post

I ran about 500 000 cycles of 37 spins and came up with the following:

(Number on left is number of unique numbers and next number is how many times a spin cycle had exactly that many unique numbers in the test)

37 spin cycle:

15   1
16   12
17   202
18   1417
19   6020
20   18309
21   41304
22   73951
23   98780
24   102814
25   80164
26   47276
27   20934
28   6706
29   1685
30   349
31   35
32   5

Is this not law of the third or as DSAA would say flaw of the third
So, there's the 24

Is this actually unique left at the end of cycle  ...with repeat counted numbers not included?



nottophammer

6th this is luck of the Irish data; posted by Turner.
So, he says about 500’000 cycles. 23 of the starting 37 hit in a cycle of 37 spins. Also 24 hit in a cycle of 37. Again 25 of the starting 37 hit in a cycle of 37 spins.
Now if you add 98780 cycles +102’814+80164=281’758 cycles of the 500’000 cycles.
To me that 24 is Lott and 23 and 25 is close enough, so over half the cycles get or close enough to the Lott.
There’s 1 cycle that had only 15 of the starting 37. Also 5 cycles had 32 of the starting 37.

Make what you want of the two sets of data.
I only posted the 1’000’000 spin data as you can see that 7 unique hit the most with 8th spin the repeat. Vaddi?
Then betting the 8 is breakeven?

How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

nottophammer

So, of the 20’000 German live spins; 41 games had no repeat in 10 spins. 9-8-7-6 = 72 games with 1 or more repeating number.
One game had 3 repeats and one had 4 repeats. But the games with 9; 1 repeat was 48 games, more than 10/10 no repeat.

Even the bloke known as DSAA or the General with his 10'330 live spins gives same results, 9/10 happens more.
But is it spin 10 or spin 8
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

-