Probe

[ignatus]

Well, this seems to work.... This is a 2 numbers bet. --Probe seach for a hot split and when that is found a positive progression is used.

Procedure

Bet the first split that is hit for 9 spins 

(1) IF HIT again within 9 spins 2 straight up numbers are bet on that split for 18 spins
(2) if not hot, bet a new split for 9 spins.

(Repeat procedure)

First tests was played with 25u bets

4/5 Games Won

[Still]

In four out of five games, i see 2100 spins for +11200 units with average drawdowns of 2700 at 25 unit bets.  If using 1 unit that would be +448 with avg. drawdowns of +111 for a gain of about .21 units per bet, a fairly conservative approach.  But what did your losing session look like?

[ignatus]

In four out of five games, i see 2100 spins for +11200 units with average drawdowns of 2700 at 25 unit bets.  If using 1 unit that would be +448 with avg. drawdowns of +111 for a gain of about .21 units per bet, a fairly conservative approach.  But what did your losing session look like?

I didn't save the losing sessions. :S If that is your wish i can save them from now on.

[ignatus]

more spins... final stats 7/10 Games won

(played with 5u bets)

[Still]

I didn't save the losing sessions. :S If that is your wish i can save them from now on.

Yes you should save the losing sessions and post a text of the trot. In this case, can you remember any details of the losing session(s)? # spins, bottom?

[ignatus]

Yes you should save the losing sessions and post a text of the trot. In this case, can you remember any details of the losing session? Spins, bottom?

hard to explain, ?

Here is how i played

5u bets Win +500u, Loss -500u
25u bets Win +2500, Loss -2500u...

[Still]

OK, so when boiled down to one unit base bets it arrives at a gain of 480 units on approx 3200 spins for a gain of .15 units per spin, win or lose. Along the way, the average drawdown was -85 with max at about - 120.  How many sessions lost back to back?

[ignatus]

 

OK, so when boiled down to one unit base bets it arrives at a gain of 480 units on approx 3200 spins for a gain of .15 units per spin, win or lose. Along the way, the average drawdown was -85 with max at about - 120.  How many sessions lost back to back?

If i can remember right, i only lost 1 session in a row, it was like WLWL....

[Still]

If i can remember right, i only lost 1 session in a row, it was like WLWL....

Ok, assuming the 7/10 win ratio holds, it might be relatively safe to apply a 3-play capped martingale after each session. You could start your first session at one unit, bump to five if lose, ten if lose again ...ect.  In this way the average bet would likely be 10x base needing a bank of about 1000x base to make about 1.5 units per spin, breaking down to about 60 units per hour on a live wheel. 

[ignatus]

Ok, assuming the 7/10 win ratio holds, it might be relatively safe to apply a 3-play capped martingale after each session. You could start your first session at one unit, bump to five if lose, ten if lose again ...ect.  In this way the average bet would likely be 10x base needing a bank of about 1000x base to make about 1.5 units per spin, breaking down to about 60 hr on a live wheel.

I'm scared to use progression, this whole system is based on hot splits and a positive progression,(any other progression would ruin it) and it seems to work pretty good

[Still]

I'm scared to use progression, this whole system is based on hot splits and a positive progression,(any other progression would ruin it) and it seems to work pretty good

Then could start with two banks of 500 each, starting with 5 unit base bet to make .75 units per bet, needing about 30 hours on a live wheel to double your bank (and base bet)...then 15 hrs, then 7.5 ...ect...about the same amount of time to do it with a progression.

[ignatus]

Then could start with two banks of 500 each, starting with 5 unit base bet to make .75 units per bet, needing about 30 hours on a live wheel to double your bank (and base bet)...then 15 hrs, then 7.5 ...ect...about the same amount of time to do it with a progression.

Yes, try that, everybody has different moneymanagement strategies.

Any testing of this system would be appriciated, (more testing is needed!)