Nice little earner!!

[mogul397]

Well we're entering a realm here that systems often get to.

1) A person plays and claims to be winning (And I believe you Brian. Just making first point)
2) Other people graze the forum cause it's the weekend, and all congratulate and chime in.
But no on puts their money where their mouth is.  It sounds like people who are congratulating someone
who won the lottery or did some non repeatable thing and got lucky. But can't repeat it themselves.
"Fist bumps all around".  But aren't they here to learn to win? Why don't they buy a lottery ticket if
someone is handing out the winning numbers?

So having had my say, I will continue to say that I went again today. And I have a whole other set of results.
Over 4 pages with about 30 spins per page.

Now, I find it difficult to process all the results specifically because I do not know what to do with the spots
that have more than one setup for a bet.  What would I bet, how would I handle the result, and what would
that mean for the next bet amount in the sequence.

Other than the rest of the crowd of well wishers, I'd like to specifically learn if I can play it and then play it.
So please don't, as you say,  make this your last post.

I have posted sets of data for you to give feedback on before and you didn't give any. Seems kind of
mysterious.  It's a lot of work to format and type results in.  Also very confusing visually to track each setup/play
with the 3 sets.

So to begin with, how do you handle, mathematically, the occurances of 2-3 bets at a time?

Thanks

Alan

[mogul397]

Hi,

Here is a series of numbers:    3 2 19 28 25 14 21 17 33  23  20  33  5  3  23 19    27  17  17 30 7 26  36  31 7  3  22  21  24

3/ 2L lose -1  19/28/25H win +2  25/14/21R win+1 17/33B lose-1  33/23/20H win+2 5/3L lose -1 5  /3/23/R win+2 23/19/27H win +2  17/17L and B -lose 1each

30/7R lose-3  26/36/31H win +4  7/3L andR lose  -1each  22/21/24H win+5    (There were a couple of other triggers but I did not play them as I had already won on them and were letting the chain play out)   This is not a perfect progression as I tend to just put various amounts on but a more disciplined prog. would be better.                E & OE     

What does it mean that (There were a couple of other triggers but I did not play them as I had already won on them and were letting the chain play out)??

[mogul397]

Just ran through the first 2 pages of data. I just tracked results that only had
one betting choice for the +/-1.  And I quickly worked up to a 13 unit bet.

And this is typical.  Is the wheel you play on rigged?

[ozon]

Does anyone have a tracker for this method, I believe that this method has a lot of potential, needs a tracker, without progression. Showing just how much I'm in the red.

[bleep24]

Hi Guys,
Been awhile since I have posted (withdrawl symtoms?)  Seems a few people are revisiting past posts and why not as a lot of ins and outs about a system will have come out and also some test results.  We perhaps need to take more note of these pasts posts of systems/ideas etc. as all the hard work should have been done and whether any good or not.

Anyway, the main reason for my post is to confirm that I am still playing `nice little earner` and it is still so.  Yes you do get `adverse` runs (not runs from hell) and I am still making money with it. I thought I would let everyone know this as I hate TV programmes where you do not find out what happened  and a lot of systems/ideas etc. on here `run out of steam`(Everyone has just spotted the HG!!!) and has to give it a try!!

Of course I am still watching current posts but nothing has taken my fancy (too complicated - massive drawdowns/bank-roll etc. etc.) 

Cheers and good luck to all  (Off to USA in 10 days time but not playing any casinos there)
Brian

[ozon]

This is one of the most stable betselection what I saw, so We might want to use it Denzie's MM. We use 30 units BR, Target profit 10 units, doubling the stakes when we -10 units.

[bleep24]

I still play this.  I have tried a few other systems but it really does seem to be the luck of the draw whether you win or not - too inconsistent.  Win then lose it all.      Opposite of nice little earner way is to play 2 the same to end.  I also play this and it also does well.   When the ball comes to rest it has to be either R/B H/L or O/E.  so results are evened out more.  Progr ession that I use is +1/-1 and I find that it works well and is easy to keep track of too.   

[bleep24]

I still play this.  I have tried a few other systems but it really does seem to be the luck of the draw whether you win or not - too inconsistent.  Win then lose it all.      Opposite of nice little earner way is to play 2 the same to end.  I also play this and it also does well.   When the ball comes to rest it has to be either R/B H/L or O/E.  so results are evened out more.  Progr ession that I use is +1/-1 and I find that it works well and is easy to keep track of too.   

[thelaw]

I still play this.  I have tried a few other systems but it really does seem to be the luck of the draw whether you win or not - too inconsistent.  Win then lose it all.      Opposite of nice little earner way is to play 2 the same to end.  I also play this and it also does well.   When the ball comes to rest it has to be either R/B H/L or O/E.  so results are evened out more.  Progr ession that I use is +1/-1 and I find that it works well and is easy to keep track of too.   

Hey Bleep,

Can you clarify this a bit?

So are you saying that this system works well, while others are more inconsistent?

Also, what is your total win-to-date (units) as well as your largest draw-down?

Thanks! 

[ozon]

In this betselection ups and downs are very mild. But I have also seen bad sessions when the + 1 / -1 would never have worked out losses. Do you use any stoploss? Sessions from hell, are very rare, but happen and I think it must be used delicate progression, with stoplose

[bleep24]

Hi,
I do not use a stop loss.  I keep playing.  No idea how much I have won with this as I do not keep records.  Only interested in winning.  Never had a large drawdown with this - possibly about 50 units though.  I try and play all 3 E/C`s at same time so you tend not to get long losing runs.  If you are losing on R/B you are usually winning on H/L or O/E and vice versa. 

Good luck.

[Nixie]

Hi Doola and welcome.

As a tribute to George Cole (and to make some dosh for yourself) I urge you to try `nice little earner` method.  It is really easy to play: no vast recording of results:  no massive progression and most of all it works.  I have been playing on-line roulette for years and this is the best that I have found overall.  Many methods are up/down or downright losers.  This does not require a large (BR) bank-roll either so:  win   win

Good luck

Thanks for the information! I'm excited to hear a veteran of the roulette world say that this is the best method found so far. I'm looking forward to trying it!

[bleep24]

Hi all,

Fraid I do not have the HG to reveal but thought I would bring `nice little earner` to possibly a new lot of `forumers`  I am still playing this and it is still winning consistently though it is a bit of a drag and you have to keep your wits about you, but winning is winning.

On a different note I have also played `Gammets` system.  Do not know where thread is located now.  I play 11 13 17 23 29 31 after a trigger but not the way the system says.  I have pretty good success with it and it does not need too much concentration and no recording.

Good luck,
Brian

[RouletteGhost]

Hello Bryan

If you have

BB you bet B? Bet for a 2 streak to turn to a 3 streak?

[bleep24]

Hi,

Yes that is right.  Any E/C.  could be 1, 2, or 3 at same time.  I only bet each opportunity once.  Even if I win I just let chain play out itself.  eg:    RRRRRRRRR  I will bet lst opportunity because it can get very complex with progression especially if other opportunities pop out in between.  If I am down say 4 units and 3 opportunities come out at same time I will put 2 units on each, but do whatever you like.  I use +1/-1 progression.  In this example you could ignore other opportunities and just play on the Reds or whatever it is.  In this example just playing reds you would win 7 units less 1`unit when chain comes to an end.  There is no definitive right and wrong way.  The whole idea behind `nle`is that different E/C`s come out so that it gives variance.  What we do not want is 2B 2B 2B 2B 2B etc. etc.

Godd luck,
Brian