Nice little earner!!

[bleep24]

This was one of many of George Cole`s  turns of phrase.   God rest his soul, he was without doubt an exceptional actor and I never failed to laugh many times during every episode of `Minder`

Anyway, some of you will have no doubt (I hope) read some of my previous posts regarding 2 E/C`s and 3 E/C`s.  What I am now playing is any E/C of 2 consecutive to become 3.  I am not treating each E/C separately so it could be 2B    2R   2O    2O   2L   2H  2E   etc. etc.    You do not find it goes many times before a win so use a progression but not an aggresive one.   A typical W/L is like this:     WLLWWWLWLLWWWLLWWWWLWLLW
Good luck.

I thought about going dolphin watching but I couldn`t see the porpoise.

[bleep24]

Forgot to mention that you may be betting on 1 or 2 or 3 at same time so adjust stakes accordingly.  Perhaps +1/-1 is as good as any for progression.

A woman office worker says to her male co-worker I bet that I can get the boss to give me the day off.  How are you going to do that.  Just watch and see she replies.  The boss enters and sees her hanging from the ceiling.  Hey, what are you doing to which she replies:   I`m a light bulb.  The boss says that he thinks that she has gone crazy over-working and sends her home.  The male worker gets his hat and coat.  The boss says; and just where are you going exactly, to which he replies:  home, I can`t work in the dark.

[bleep24]

I like it - I like it       sang Gerry and the Pacemakers in the 1960`s but it could equally apply to `nice little earner` to-day as this is turning out to be a hit.   No losses.   Have tried it over 9 `sessions` of approx. 90/100 spins each and it performs very well.     Need some testers and feed back pleas :)e.

[Tomla021]

everything i have tested using +1 -1 on double ec , high even, red/odd, etc etc using follow trend or against trend seems to work out

[doola]

This was one of many of George Cole`s  turns of phrase.   God rest his soul, he was without doubt an exceptional actor and I never failed to laugh many times during every episode of `Minder`

Always loved Minder and George Cole, RIP.

[bleep24]

Hi Doola and welcome.

As a tribute to George Cole (and to make some dosh for yourself) I urge you to try `nice little earner` method.  It is really easy to play: no vast recording of results:  no massive progression and most of all it works.  I have been playing on-line roulette for years and this is the best that I have found overall.  Many methods are up/down or downright losers.  This does not require a large (BR) bank-roll either so:  win   win

Good luck

[atlantis]

Thanks bleep for a nice little system!
Keep winning and - "the world is your lobster!"
'Er indoors likes it.
Can you show a little snippet sequence of numbers to demo your mode of play?

[thelaw]

This was one of many of George Cole`s  turns of phrase.   God rest his soul, he was without doubt an exceptional actor and I never failed to laugh many times during every episode of `Minder`

Anyway, some of you will have no doubt (I hope) read some of my previous posts regarding 2 E/C`s and 3 E/C`s.  What I am now playing is any E/C of 2 consecutive to become 3.  I am not treating each E/C separately so it could be 2B    2R   2O    2O   2L   2H  2E   etc. etc.    You do not find it goes many times before a win so use a progression but not an aggresive one.   A typical W/L is like this:     WLLWWWLWLLWWWLLWWWWLWLLW
Good luck.

I thought about going dolphin watching but I couldn`t see the porpoise.

Hey Bleep,

How often are you seeing 3 losses in a row?

Thanks!

[RouletteGhost]

So essentially if theres 2 in a row you bet for 3

[bleep24]

Hi,

Away from home just now but will post a sequence of numbers in next couple days.   You can get 3 losses in a row quite often but if you are betting 1 unit that is a loss of 3 units.(Depending what progression if any that you are using it could be more - just adjust stakes accordingly)   Say next out is 2B AND 2H - put 2 units on each.  You may win 1 of these.  Next trigger 2E - put 2 on this.  Lots of wins so easily catch up.  Quite often you will have 3 triggers at the same time - bet all 3.   I used to play each E/C separately but you could get quite a lot of 2`s staying 2`s.  With this you find that you may get say 2B for 6 or more triggers, but in between there will be other triggers becoming 3`s so it does not matter.  That`s what makes this soooooo good.There are lots of different progs. that should work well with this.     By my reckoning at least 2 out of every 3 become 3`s or more.   You can carry on a series after getting a 3 if you wish, I usually just let the series play out.  Hence:  HHHHHHH  I would bet once and win and wait for H`s to end as there are plenty of other triggers coming along all the time, but you can decide - neither way is right or wrong but it is easier for tracking as I just use spin history and if you are having to remember where you are with prog. then it could get complicated.  Or do not bet every trigger - you chose.  It is the core method that is  important. 

Good luck everyone

[RouletteGhost]

How long have you been playing this way bleep?

[bleep24]

Hi RouletteGhost,

I have been playing this for over 6 months but only on and off.  You know how it is:  you see a new system/method/strategy/MM etc. and you think to yourself this could be the HG so you have to try it.  You spend time testing/back-testing.  Find that it is not the HG but something else catches your eye and off you go again.  Perhaps we should learn from this and stick to what we know/like/and roughly works.

 
Cheers,    Brian         (nice little earner has only `failed` a few times overall but I probably could have pulled it round if I had persevered)

[bleep24]

Hi,

Here is a series of numbers:    3 2 19 28 25 14 21 17 33  23  20  33  5  3  23 19    27  17  17 30 7 26  36  31 7  3  22  21  24

3/ 2L lose -1  19/28/25H win +2  25/14/21R win+1 17/33B lose-1  33/23/20H win+2 5/3L lose -1 5  /3/23/R win+2 23/19/27H win +2  17/17L and B -lose 1each

30/7R lose-3  26/36/31H win +4  7/3L andR lose  -1each  22/21/24H win+5    (There were a couple of other triggers but I did not play them as I had already won on them and were letting the chain play out)   This is not a perfect progression as I tend to just put various amounts on but a more disciplined prog. would be better.                E & OE       

[RouletteGhost]

Hi,

Here is a series of numbers:    3 2 19 28 25 14 21 17 33  23  20  33  5  3  23 19    27  17  17 30 7 26  36  31 7  3  22  21  24

3/ 2L lose -1  19/28/25H win +2  25/14/21R win+1 17/33B lose-1  33/23/20H win+2 5/3L lose -1 5  /3/23/R win+2 23/19/27H win +2  17/17L and B -lose 1each

30/7R lose-3  26/36/31H win +4  7/3L andR lose  -1each  22/21/24H win+5    (There were a couple of other triggers but I did not play them as I had already won on them and were letting the chain play out)   This is not a perfect progression as I tend to just put various amounts on but a more disciplined prog. would be better.                E & OE     

+1/-1 there?

[mogul397]

Forgot to mention that you may be betting on 1 or 2 or 3 at same time so adjust stakes accordingly.  Perhaps +1/-1 is as good as any for progression.

A woman office worker says to her male co-worker I bet that I can get the boss to give me the day off.  How are you going to do that.  Just watch and see she replies.  The boss enters and sees her hanging from the ceiling.  Hey, what are you doing to which she replies:   I`m a light bulb.  The boss says that he thinks that she has gone crazy over-working and sends her home.  The male worker gets his hat and coat.  The boss says; and just where are you going exactly, to which he replies:  home, I can`t work in the dark.

I'll just add this in here instead of at the end. In my decades of attempting rational ways of playing of
betting, one of the earlier methods I bought was called "Mr C craps business program".  It was by
Al Coggins. (Mr C).  In the course of acquiring it over time I managed to speak to him on the phone and
a friend of mine arranged a meeting with him at a casino. It cost me $200  at an early random time when
I wasn't returning systems, and this one seemed a little more than bullshit.

Mr C claimed that he earned his living at craps for years. Paid his bills, etc.

Simply put, you wait for 2 or 3 don't passes. Then you bet pass. Once. If you lose sometimes twice.
1 or two units on the second bet.

He had what he called the "movie test" which comprised of watching a table like you would a movie
to "see if you like what you see" and then decide to play or move on.

This is where the discresion came in. No progression except maybe the 2nd bet after the loss.
If the table isn't good to you, you move on.

Anyway, I have loved this methodology for decades. Last time I tracked it on a craps table I couldn't
even get the 2 don'ts. And watched one monster pass roll go by. The thing that I took away from that
was that it could be time consuming and lead me toward electronic roulette.

I tracked some of this from zumma and figured, what the heck. You shouldn't see too many long
runs. Well you did. And on some level it almost supported what Mr C was saying. At some points
you will see things cluster and you can capitalize on them. The times I saw many runs of 3 or more,
or like that wouldn't let me really do a progression. Sadly.

But maybe if I did a movie test and it looked good, I could settle in that way. The way the method
was meant to be. Without saying or Knowing it, I think that this was the simple logic that Al coggins
had. Simple logic for a simple method.

Which I like.