Nice little earner!!

[RouletteGhost]

See. Thats where you have proven you dont understand

I lost with it twice. Small losses..

Why? I did not follow lankys rules. I was impatient. It was my fault

Played correctly the trigger wins everytime

You were being so negative and naive while everyone was testing so i banned u. Want to come back?

The method is a big time winner. But it takes a long time for a trigger

I am impatient so im still searching

[bleep24]

Hi Mogul397/RouletteGhost,

Now now boys.  I did not know whether to clean my pair of pistols or sharpen my rapiers ready for the duel!!!!   A little light criticism is ok but it should not get too personal.   That is my two-peneth (two cents) worth on the subject.   Only back home for half a day so when I look next week I hope that I am not seeing any more aggravation only positive posts on methods/systems/strategies which is what this forum SHOULD be about.

Bury the hatchet, regards, Brian     (NOT in each other`s Heads!!!)

[Turner]

Hi Mogul397/RouletteGhost,

Now now boys.  I did not know whether to clean my pair of pistols or sharpen my rapiers ready for the duel!!!!   A little light criticism is ok but it should not get too personal.   That is my two-peneth (two cents) worth on the subject.   Only back home for half a day so when I look next week I hope that I am not seeing any more aggravation only positive posts on methods/systems/strategies which is what this forum SHOULD be about.

Bury the hatchet, regards, Brian     (NOT in each other`s Heads!!!)

Sound advice Bleep

Thanks for keeping things on track.

Nice Little Earner has been a Nice Little Post

[mogul397]

Hi Mogul397/RouletteGhost,

Now now boys.  I did not know whether to clean my pair of pistols or sharpen my rapiers ready for the duel!!!!   A little light criticism is ok but it should not get too personal.   That is my two-peneth (two cents) worth on the subject.   Only back home for half a day so when I look next week I hope that I am not seeing any more aggravation only positive posts on methods/systems/strategies which is what this forum SHOULD be about.

Bury the hatchet, regards, Brian     (NOT in each other`s Heads!!!)

Well Bleep. No, I'm not swinging hatches. But what I've come up with in testing is
a fairly even spread of 2 and 3+ in a row. As expected. So I'm not sure how you're winning.
I will freely admit that I haven't given the progression the "acid test", but sometimes it
seems like we are really in the black.  Maybe I'm inpatient or expecting too much.

[nottophammer]

@bleep24

Well done 
Have good trip, and I will have a look at this one whilst you fly! 

Chris do you give this the green light,or let the dust settle

[bleep24]

Hi Mogul397,

You said it all in your reply #93      "a fairly even spread of 2`s and 3+"   and  "sometimes we are really in the black"      What more do you expect?        This is what `nice little earner` is all about and is obviously doing its job if this is what you are finding.   You are at a bit of a disadvantage to me as I play 1 zero roulette and 50% loss on a zero French roulette if possible.    A typical series will be:   2R  2H  3B  3O  3B 2R 3H  2L   2O 2E 3H 3R 2B 2O 3L 3R  3H  etc. etc  (8 losses/8 wins +9)  I have ignored wins after a winning chain of 3 has come out.  Also you could stop playing, bank those winning units, and then start off again later. I find that on average it is more like 2 losses against 3 wins.

Look before you leap onto a table to see if dealer is throwing out a good number of 3+chains, and keep an eye out during your play and especially when a dealer change happens for the trend.  I do not know how a dealer throws mainly 2`s or mainly 3`s, but they do.

Cheers,  Brian     (Just back from 5 days child minding  - thank goodness for some rest!!!)

[nottophammer]

hope you've not pulled all your hair out

[bleep24]

What hair!!   I lost it years ago.  Should have said grand-children.  At least you can leave them with their parents and come back home.

Regards,   Brian

[Chrisbis]

What hair!!   I lost it years ago.  At least you can leave them with their parents and come back home.

Me too on the hair. ....and absolutely on the hand back! !
😆

[mogul397]

Hi Mogul397,

You said it all in your reply #93      "a fairly even spread of 2`s and 3+"   and  "sometimes we are really in the black"      What more do you expect?        This is what `nice little earner` is all about and is obviously doing its job if this is what you are finding.   You are at a bit of a disadvantage to me as I play 1 zero roulette and 50% loss on a zero French roulette if possible.    A typical series will be:   2R  2H  3B  3O  3B 2R 3H  2L   2O 2E 3H 3R 2B 2O 3L 3R  3H  etc. etc  (8 losses/8 wins +9)  I have ignored wins after a winning chain of 3 has come out.  Also you could stop playing, bank those winning units, and then start off again later. I find that on average it is more like 2 losses against 3 wins.

Look before you leap onto a table to see if dealer is throwing out a good number of 3+chains, and keep an eye out during your play and especially when a dealer change happens for the trend.  I do not know how a dealer throws mainly 2`s or mainly 3`s, but they do.

Cheers,  Brian     (Just back from 5 days child minding  - thank goodness for some rest!!!)

Well it's been a while since I looked at this, but I feel like I showed some instances where the
runs were not that good. Please don't cherry pick words or comments out of what I said.
Of  course there are times when you end up "in the black".  That's not the point. You also kind
of end up winning every other bet, being that it is a 50/50 result.  That's not the point.

The point is how hot the heat gets when it doesn't work.  You only have to fall off a building once
to break your legs. OR get killed.

[mogul397]

Hi Mogul397,

You said it all in your reply #93      "a fairly even spread of 2`s and 3+"   and  "sometimes we are really in the black"      What more do you expect?        This is what `nice little earner` is all about and is obviously doing its job if this is what you are finding.   You are at a bit of a disadvantage to me as I play 1 zero roulette and 50% loss on a zero French roulette if possible.    A typical series will be:   2R  2H  3B  3O  3B 2R 3H  2L   2O 2E 3H 3R 2B 2O 3L 3R  3H  etc. etc  (8 losses/8 wins +9)  I have ignored wins after a winning chain of 3 has come out.  Also you could stop playing, bank those winning units, and then start off again later. I find that on average it is more like 2 losses against 3 wins.

Look before you leap onto a table to see if dealer is throwing out a good number of 3+chains, and keep an eye out during your play and especially when a dealer change happens for the trend.  I do not know how a dealer throws mainly 2`s or mainly 3`s, but they do.

Cheers,  Brian     (Just back from 5 days child minding  - thank goodness for some rest!!!)

Also saying "a typical series is", is kind of irrelevant. That can be anything. And I get the "movie test" idea.
But the truth is that I don't see what you are saying the way you are saying it. Examples that I gave are
examples.

1) I don't see any unique difference where you watch and see >2 series (if that is what you mean and not
LITERALLY  3's and not '3 or more")

2) Even if I did, I would feel like I saw and let winning opportunities go, and were setting myself up
for loses to come. More conventional gambling logic would be to see some doubles happen, and then
jump in after the losses, to get the wins.

[bleep24]

Hi Mogul397,

Waiting for losses could be a good idea, but do you wait for 2 or 3 or 4 or what losses and is this not `gambler`s fallacy` that after 2 losses it most likely will be a win.  Red has shown 18 times so black is due.  No, it is still 50/50.(I do believe in probability)

I have just had a terrible run (so no, not all my series are great) I had 10 x 2 losses consecutively.  I played +1/1 so had a loss at the maximum of about 60/70 units.    I played through it and came out 22 units in front when I stopped playing.  Next bet would have been 5 units.  Approx. 80/90 spins and there were 19 winners and 22 losers so still not too far from 50/50, and this was an untypical series.  I am surprised that I kept playing, but the max. unit size was 13 and as I play 1 unit = 1 GB pound not too bad and I would hope to make any loss (if there was one) up on next series or two.   This is where a different (better?) progression may have helped, but some time ago I was playing 1 2  4 8 16 on this so I would have been right up s++t creek without a paddle if I had still been playing that way.

Even if I had packed in and taken the loss it would be far out weighed by previous winnings.

Nil desperandum!!

Cheers,     Brian

[nottophammer]

Brian
Have you tried with  Fibo out of curiosity

[bleep24]

Hi Nottophammer,

No I have never tried a fibo. with this.    I may have a look at that.   I am a bit lazy and I find that +1/-1 is easy to follow and as I have never had a wipe-out with `nle`I have tended to stick with that, but never say never.   If you look at some of my previous posts I was using +1/-1 with those methods.  Better the devil you know!!!!!!!           I would like to spend a bit time trying differential betting with this, it should work!    Also playing on after winning on a 3 chain.   I could spend all day playing around with `nle` in various ways but as I am just semi-retired there are quite a few calls on my time, not to mention spending time at my static caravan, and grand-children.

How would a Fibo. have worked with 10 consecutive losses.  (see my earlier post)

Cheers,     Brian

[mogul397]

Hi Mogul397,

Waiting for losses could be a good idea, but do you wait for 2 or 3 or 4 or what losses and is this not `gambler`s fallacy` that after 2 losses it most likely will be a win.  Red has shown 18 times so black is due.  No, it is still 50/50.(I do believe in probability)

I have just had a terrible run (so no, not all my series are great) I had 10 x 2 losses consecutively.  I played +1/1 so had a loss at the maximum of about 60/70 units.    I played through it and came out 22 units in front when I stopped playing.  Next bet would have been 5 units.  Approx. 80/90 spins and there were 19 winners and 22 losers so still not too far from 50/50, and this was an untypical series.  I am surprised that I kept playing, but the max. unit size was 13 and as I play 1 unit = 1 GB pound not too bad and I would hope to make any loss (if there was one) up on next series or two.   This is where a different (better?) progression may have helped, but some time ago I was playing 1 2  4 8 16 on this so I would have been right up s++t creek without a paddle if I had still been playing that way.

Even if I had packed in and taken the loss it would be far out weighed by previous winnings.

Nil desperandum!!

Cheers,     Brian

Brian, one thing that I like about you is that you are consistent and positive.  Because of that I feel like
I'm going to keep giving this a go.  Somehow it's working for you and I don't see it as a crazy way to
play. It is helpful to at least know that you experience some bad runs. But one question. How did the
bad run end up?  10 consecutive losses?  The next bet would have been more than 5 units.  Am I missing something?

When I say that I see bad runs it can be consecutive, or just simple accumulation of losses. Doesn't matter.
I also had thought of a fib. It's a nice idea in that it is half way between the D'alenbert and the labby. It resolves
with 2 consecutive wins. Appealing.

I have been thinking about a kind of abstract thought.

1) That a lot of the aspect of climbing the loss ladder has to do with it being a one way street. Where
the consecutive stacking nature of more losses leads to bigger bets, and therefore quicker drawdowns.
It is in the nature of how betting methods run that they are always collecting the most recent results and
doing something based on that. Not sure where this leads. But does it have to be in a straight line?

What about a circle?  A layered circle.  For example if you had a series of losses  1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2 say. In a perfect world.
Then you had wins   2,3,2,3,2,3,2,3. That accomplishes the same thing as 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. But you never
climb the ladder to higher bets. If the losses were "positional" in some way, where you worked your way around
the circle to attack the losses, the maybe it would help.  Always circling around. Of course there will be times
where the losses don't line up and stack, similar to a normal progression. But you eliminate or chop up those
losing streaks. and eventually sprinkle in wins.

What about what you did with 1,1,1,  2,2,2   3,3,3.... that kind of idea.

Just brainstorming.

Cause I don't see how that (or those) losing streaks don't get deadly that you talk about. How you're
only betting 5 units......

I will say that where I am now the min bet is $3. And the max bet $1500. You could do a lot of damage with those
constraints. If you believed and kept attacking.

Alan