Nice little earner!!

[tuddilue]

In the original NLE do you play separate +1/-1 for each of the six EC's or is it  +1/-1 over all EC's?

I played +1/-1 over all EC's on every opportunity and went up to 15 unit plus but after an hour I was down 10 units. Maybe I did wrong or?

Thanks
- Tuddilue

[tuddilue]

In the original NLE do you play separate +1/-1 for each of the six EC's or is it  +1/-1 over all EC's?

I played +1/-1 over all EC's on every opportunity and went up to 15 unit plus but after an hour I was down 10 units. Maybe I did wrong or?

Thanks
- Tuddilue

Maybe an example is better I played like this:
R
R Bet 1 unit
B lost
B O
B O 2 units on both
R E lost on both
R E Bet 3 units on both...
Should it be like this or separate +1/-1 on R/B and O/E.
Thanks
-Tuddilue

[RayManZ]

If you would read what was posted you would know the anwser.

Just some posts above your question he posted a example.

He bets +1-1 for the 3 EC's. So not 6. But 3. RB HL OE. Three groups. Also he let streaks end first. Only 1 bet is made if you get two of the same. Then wait again.

[Rewster88]

This can be perfectly combined with the boffins bet


R

[nottophammer]

like reply 151

[Rewster88]

yes,

i tested a couple hundred live spins on RX got some mixed results, fun to play on a casino night.



R

[bleep24]

Hi Tuddilue,
You are betting on combined E/C`s with one bank +1/-1.       NOT betting E/C`s separately with separate banks.  That is the whole point of this method to avoid 2R 2R 2R 2R etc.       It is to mix up betting so it goes  2B 2R 2H 2R 2O 2O 2E 2B etc. obviously for them to become 3`s.  I do not play on a chain after winning first 2 becoming 3.  Mainly because the longer the chain the less frequent it will happen and when chain comes to an end you lose 1 unit which overall will probably balance out.

Good luck,
Brian

[tuddilue]

If you would read what was posted you would know the anwser.

Just some posts above your question he posted a example.

He bets +1-1 for the 3 EC's. So not 6. But 3. RB HL OE. Three groups. Also he let streaks end first. Only 1 bet is made if you get two of the same. Then wait again.

Thanks RayManZ, yes I thought I did understand it but obviously not.

Ok I think I understand it now. So the 3 EC is separately. I will test again..
-Tuddilue

[tuddilue]

Hi Tuddilue,
You are betting on combined E/C`s with one bank +1/-1.       NOT betting E/C`s separately with separate banks.  That is the whole point of this method to avoid 2R 2R 2R 2R etc.       It is to mix up betting so it goes  2B 2R 2H 2R 2O 2O 2E 2B etc. obviously for them to become 3`s.  I do not play on a chain after winning first 2 becoming 3.  Mainly because the longer the chain the less frequent it will happen and when chain comes to an end you lose 1 unit which overall will probably balance out.

Good luck,
Brian

Ok I think I understand more.

I will test it again 

[tuddilue]

I think the reply 25 says it all how to play this.

When looking at that chart I also sees why I failed.  As you all said before I played all EC not the 3 EC separately.

So back to testing. Thanks.
-Tuddilue

[atlantis]

Hi tuddilue,

I also think I have been overthinking a bit in my cautious adaptation (using a rolling 64 history + separate bank for all 6 EC's... I think my way was slightly problematical in that it was concentrating on under performers returning to mean - trouble is they can go on sleeping as we all know; even when you think they must surely be due! So it ended up missing other EC series that WERE performing well... in addition was way too slow with infrequent bet opps..)

Anyhow today I played a couple of sessions using bleep24's original way using +1/-1 and betting like in nottophammer's chart. It's a lot easier without the hassle of prior tracking like I was doing before...

It seems a surprisingly cool way to play and I quickly won a couple of live online dealer sessions without much trouble either.
I agree also with Brian with what he said earlier about the chain betting - I did not play on a chain after winning a series of 2 becoming a series of 3.
There's a lot to like about it.

Regards,
A.

[bleep24]

HI Atlantis,

Well done.  It is easy and what`s more it works.    Just been on Wm. Hill`Live` this morning won 23 units in about 1 hour.  2`s becoming 3`s were coming out left, right and centre.  I use +1/-1 but a bit more aggressive prog. would probably see even better returns, though I have not tried any other prog. with this.

Just out of curiosity I looked at spin history of 4 other tables and 2`s becoming 3`s were coming out all the time on all of them too so it does not seem to matter which table you choose.  (I only play `Live spins`)

Good luck,   Brian

[RouletteGhost]

Always enjoy reading Atlantis' posts.

[RouletteGhost]

Bleep i must say

With the amount of time you have been playing this

And the fact you are UP is very promising

Not a risky play at all. Conservative.

[Priyanka]

Bleep, Others,

Trying to see whether this is how you play this.

13
34   
2     
5     -1U Loss on even
35   -1U loss on Low
6     -2U Loss on odd
10   +1U win on Black
27   -3U Loss on even. -2U loss on Low
27
30  -4U Loss on odd. +3U win on High. +1U win on Red
1