Nice little earner!!

[RouletteGhost]

Good job Brian

[tuddilue]

...

I have not kept any statistics on what % 2`s become 3`s but from where I am sitting it is above 50% hence success.I  never had to bet more than 10 units (single stake) and that is rare.  2/3/4 or 5 are the norm.

Another method that I like and have had success with is a DD method. Look at last 4 spins and see if there are only 2 different dozens. Bet missing dozen.  I flat bet this.  I have played several ways so cannot give a definitive answer but it is definitely worth toying around with.  Standard method is on this forum somewhere.  Not mine.

Good luck,  Brian

Hi Brian,
I think I'm playing like you now I try to always win 1unit and splits between the different ops when they comes. I can confirm that 2/3/4 and 5 is the norm. I will continue to test 

I saw that GLC talked about the same DD as you here :
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=12719.0
Maybe that is the one you referring to?
-Tuddilue

[bleep24]

Hi Tuddilue,
I am very pleased that you are having success with NLE.  It is a great little method, and it works A bit slow and boring but never the less winning is winning and that is what this does.

Yes that link is the DD.  Selection results are very good.   What you need to do is decide if flat betting or a prog. and if so which one.
I have flat bet on every trigger.  Also I have flat bet just on first trigger.  If win, wait for next trigger but wait at least 4 spins.  If lose wait at least 4 spins to find next trigger and so on (FLAT BETTING)   I have not tried GLC`s suggested prog. with this so cannot comment but because you are covering 24 numbers the prog. possibilities are endless.   I did look at a Parlay and this seems to have possibilities as well.   Did a short run on columns and that seems ok as well.   How many hours in a day?   Not enough.

If you never try the only possible result is failure.

Good luck and keep playing,
Brian

[tuddilue]

Hi Tuddilue,
I am very pleased that you are having success with NLE.  It is a great little method, and it works A bit slow and boring but never the less winning is winning and that is what this does.

Yes that link is the DD.  Selection results are very good.   What you need to do is decide if flat betting or a prog. and if so which one.
I have flat bet on every trigger.  Also I have flat bet just on first trigger.  If win, wait for next trigger but wait at least 4 spins.  If lose wait at least 4 spins to find next trigger and so on (FLAT BETTING)   I have not tried GLC`s suggested prog. with this so cannot comment but because you are covering 24 numbers the prog. possibilities are endless.   I did look at a Parlay and this seems to have possibilities as well.   Did a short run on columns and that seems ok as well.   How many hours in a day?   Not enough.

If you never try the only possible result is failure.

Good luck and keep playing,
Brian

Thanks! Yes it's a fun little method. I like to play the EC but before this method I always lost the play. Will this also loose? Of course I'm assuming it. But for now no loses yet. Up to 6 in the progression and as you said before 50 units is not a big loss...

I'm also logging it with GUT. Will be interesting to see how NLE handles some more difficult trots like fast ones and really slow ones. Time will tell...

Yes GLC posts is always good. I have tested a lot of his ideas before. You always learn something from him. Sad that he doesn't post anymore nowadays. It was always fun to read them.

Flatbet on the DD I think is the way to do this. DD can go south really fast and it's hard to recap the losses. I will give it a try of course. I do not know if @RouletteGhost tested this method? He is more skilled at DD than I am.

Thanks!
- Tuddilue

[atlantis]

Hi,

In 64 spins the ideal expectation of the doublesides of all 3 EC's (6 EC's) forming a series of 2 ONLY is 24.

In 64 spins the ideal expectation of the doublesides of all 3 EC's (6 EC's) forming a series of MORE THAN 2 is 24 too.

37.5% avg.

Keeping these general law of appearance stats findings in mind, it does seem to me to make sense to integrate it with bleep24's "Nice Little Earner" system (N.L.E.) and play exactly as he directs eg:  for series of 2 to become a chain or series of 3 (for one bet only) across all 3 EC's (RB-OE-HL) flatbetting or with mild progression.

To my mind, the key signal to bet for a series of 2 to become a series of 3 would ONLY BE when the total occurrences of ALL series of 3 and 3+ for all 6  sides of the EC's (R,B,O,E,H,L) was significantly LESS THAN the average 24 at any particular time by consulting these occurrences in a personal ongoing rolling history of the last 64 spins. (Variance + return to mean principles)

As an example of what I mean is; you could decide to make a rule to opt to bet only for series of any 3 to form as with N.L.E. method - but only when there were just 18 or less total hits of series greater than 2 in the "current 64".



Only a thought! My little suggestion attempt in the interests of more safety. What do you think?

Regards,
Atlantis.

[mogul397]

Hi Tuddilue,
I am very pleased that you are having success with NLE.  It is a great little method, and it works A bit slow and boring but never the less winning is winning and that is what this does.

Yes that link is the DD.  Selection results are very good.   What you need to do is decide if flat betting or a prog. and if so which one.
I have flat bet on every trigger.  Also I have flat bet just on first trigger.  If win, wait for next trigger but wait at least 4 spins.  If lose wait at least 4 spins to find next trigger and so on (FLAT BETTING)   I have not tried GLC`s suggested prog. with this so cannot comment but because you are covering 24 numbers the prog. possibilities are endless.   I did look at a Parlay and this seems to have possibilities as well.   Did a short run on columns and that seems ok as well.   How many hours in a day?   Not enough.

If you never try the only possible result is failure.

Good luck and keep playing,
Brian

I don't think it's slow and boring at all. With 3 choices of EC's on
airball it comes plenty fast for me.


This could be the bread and butter I'm looking for to enjoy stopping
off at the casino for an hour and picking up some money. Not out of
need. But it's enjoyable to play and stay in the back.

[bleep24]

Hi Atlantis,
No disrespect but I think that your idea is over-egging the pudding (English)  The saying that comes to my mind regarding NLE is: What Will Be Will Be.. Because 2`s becoming 3`s are happening regularly (above 50% I would venture) I do not think that there is a need to TRY and out-wit what will come out:  just let it happen.

My two-peneth:  2 cents. 2 euros etc. etc`s worth of observations.

Good luck,
Brian

[atlantis]

I do not think that there is a need to TRY and out-wit what will come out:  just let it happen.
My two-peneth:  2 cents. 2 euros etc. etc`s worth of observations.
Brian

Hi Brian,
I am willing to accept that you may indeed be right and my idea may prove fruitless or even unnecessary...
I was just bearing in mind those stats, and it seemed a reasonable enough assumption to risk betting only when it would appear that the odds/chances were favouring a hit due to an imbalance (under 24 appearances of 2+)
In other words that after "lagging behind" for a while, so to speak, and in order to fulfil the 'law' quoted,  that the 2+ patterns must surely very soon start to once again become prominent inside the ever changing grid of 64 outcomes and that this could be a plan to capitalise on the said deficiency. Hopefully would also require a lower initial bankroll and keep the staking to a lower level too (due to expectation of upcoming early successful wins anticipated)

But, again, this way would be harder to play and take more time and concentration. I am sure it WOULD work though.
However, you cannot get away from the fact that your way is nice and easy and great fun to play and as I said previously - may not need to be any major change to stop it delivering.

Just putting my idea out there for others to ponder and think about whether it's logical or reasonable. It may work as good or better than NLE but ultimately involve lower staking risk for the respective 3 EC's - which might be good if results were to show consistent wins + lower stakes overall... because you could then play for HIGHER unit amounts knowing the risk of losing was much reduced  - even if the wins gained took longer to achieve.

A.

[bleep24]

Hi Atlantis,
Thanks for your comments.  Some may well be true but does less betting with higher stakes not run the risk of bigger losses when they happen (as they will) and balancing out overall.  As you say: more watching and waiting. Who knows when the winning streak is ending?   
As the Bard of Avon said: (I have probably mis-quoted)  Ah, thereby is the rub.

I am English and apologise to you `foreigners` for using English vernacular!!!!!!!!!!   It is even worse because I am a Geordie Englishman:  the best kind.

(Bard of Avon.  William Shakespeare)     Everyone after reading this will be Googling like mad.

Good luck,
Brian











Good luck,   Brian

[nottophammer]

Could someone run these,

Code Select Expand

# R B O E L H R/B O/E L/H 1
35
18
7
24
15
13
20
5
35
16
9
24
15
17
16
0
27
2
20
36
21
36
24
0
26
21
4
35
30
1
26
3
18
9
10
1
36
4
4
25






















[mogul397]

Just stopped by to try a run with real $$$.

It didn't go as smoothly as I expected.  I only played
for a short time and went to paper. I got a lot of
skips where I had more than on betting op.

I may try to type it in.

Later.

[bleep24]

Hello Nottophammer,
Ends up losing about 13 units.(depending on prog)  There are about 30 spins.  I have only ever, ever seen a run like that once or twice  in a year.   There are 13 losing 2`s and only 5 winning 3`s.   It usually works out at about 50%.  Was this air-ball or RNG.  I never play either. I usually play for about 1 hour (60 spins or so)   I wonder if you have contrived this series of numbers to test?

I have glanced through spin histories on here and cannot see any such results.

If you are playing 1 unit = 1 pound/euro/dollar it is no great loss compared to other systems/methods.

I would have been playing on if I hit that series.
Cheers,
Brian

[atlantis]

Could someone run these...

Hi notto,
I got +1 after the 40 spins.
Playing +1/-1 on each of the 3EC's
A.

[bleep24]

Hello Mogul397,
Why are you only playing one opp. if there are more at the same time.  That  is the raison d` etre of this method to spread bets over any E/C`s.   eg:    R O L     B E L   B O L etc. etc.


I may have misunderstood you.

Cheers,     Brian               (I will respond to your pm later)

[mogul397]

Hello Mogul397,
Why are you only playing one opp. if there are more at the same time.  That  is the raison d` etre of this method to spread bets over any E/C`s.   eg:    R O L     B E L   B O L etc. etc.


I may have misunderstood you.

Cheers,     Brian               (I will respond to your pm later)

Glad you are listening. No I am not. In fact I am attaching my results from this afternoon,
a couple hours ago.  You will see a line where I just copied data from the marquis.
then I got ready to play. I played a few and stopped up $5.  I unit.

Then I track the rest of the data that I watched.  I was moving slowly into that 3-4 unit
area.  But as I said, I don't play multiples. To be honest, I don't completely understand
how you factor them in. I have an idea. You can explain it more fully please.

I see a multiple as a multiple bet on wherever you are in your progression. If your
next bet is 3 units, then you bet both or all choices with 3 units.  So you make 3 you can
do anything from make 9 units to lose 9 units on a triple bet. Or win or lose 6 units on
a double bet.

The next question s how you factor that in for your next bet.

I had mostly skips at the end of this run. Which WAS boring and frustrating.

Please advise.

Thanks