Random Thoughts

[Turner]

Bitterness.

No, it was quite savory. Less Rice, more spam me thinks

*Rimshot*

[RouletteGhost]

Had much spam in hawaii

[Turner]

Anyways...sorry Priyanka...Im bored

Back to the real world

Can you explain 'defines' and explain in the context you use it

Thanks

[nottophammer]

Thats your 4 posts for today then

[Turner]

Thats your 4 posts for today then

Yes I am interested 

5 actually

I appreciate your keen observation. Banter is what I need

[ati]

Thanks for posting again Priyanka!
It may seem that no one is interested, but believe me, I'm thinking about the things you've written day and night. Although I had to take a few months off, and could not concentrate on roulette at the beginning of this year.
I think that before I try to fully understand your thought process I need to read and re-read thousands of posts on various forums to learn from the brightest minds, and it takes a lot of time.

[maestro]

@priyanka...so whats better to bet acording to your cycles samples...38% ones or 62% ones...thanks..because i got feelings that 38% would be better

[Priyanka]

Im bored

I notice! Calm buddha has swapped places for a rocky guitar. Pressures of moderatorship, joy of grandparentship....

"Defined" - The dozen which caused the cycle or the dozen that repeated.


20
31
20 - the cycle was defined by the dozen 2
1
31
22 - The cycle was defined by dozen 2 again.


1
8 - cycle was defined by dozen 1
22
18 - cycle was defined by a different dozen - dozen 2.

[Priyanka]

@priyanka...so whats better to bet acording to your cycles samples...38% ones or 62% ones...thanks..because i got feelings that 38% would be better

Maestro - It is not that straightforward. I wish it was. This is one of the statistics that need to be used for getting that advanatage.

[Priyanka]

Thanks for posting again Priyanka!
It may seem that no one is interested, but believe me, I'm thinking about the things you've written day and night. Although I had to take a few months off, and could not concentrate on roulette at the beginning of this year.
I think that before I try to fully understand your thought process I need to read and re-read thousands of posts on various forums to learn from the brightest minds, and it takes a lot of time.

Thanks ati.  Wish you all he best in your endeavours.

[Turner]

I notice! Calm buddha has swapped places for a rocky guitar. Pressures of moderatorship, joy of grandparentship....

Its not a rocky guitar, its a picture of my own guitar.

Thanks for the explanation. I get it

[Drazen]

This is my attempt to play as Pri has explained. So what we are doing is playing one dozen to be the definer as in the previous cycle. We are playing only one dozen.


20
36
19 cycle defined by dozen 2
35 bet next cycle do be defined by previous dozen so bet dozen 2
2 L -1
14 w +2, cycle ends, being defined by dozen 2
9 bet dozen 2 for the next cycle to be defined as like previous one
18 +2, bet dozen 2 to be defined by dozen 2
27 L -1, cycle ends, now being defined by dozen 3
22 start betting for this cycle to be defined by dozen 3 so bet dozen 3
28 +2, bet dozen 3
5 L -1now cycle defined by dozen 1
20 start betting dozen 1
13 L -1, cycle ends, now cycle being defined by dozen 2
13 start betting to be defined by dozen 2
11 L-1
21 W+2, cycle ends, defined by dozen 2
22 betting dozen 2
26 -1
15 w +2, defined by dozen 2
23 bet dozen 2
23 w+2 cycle ends, defined by dozen 2
15 bet dozen 2
8 L -1
9 L -1, cycle ends being defined by dozen 1
13 start betting dozen 1
29 L-1
36 L-1 cycle ends, being defined by dozen 3
3 start betting dozen 3
1 L-1 cyle being defined by dozen 1
26 bet dozen 1
16 L-1
33 L -1 cycle defined by dozen 3
13 bet dozen 3
31 w+2
6 L-1 cycle defined by dozen 1
28 bet dozen 1
17 L -1
25 L-1 cycle defined by dozen 3
30 bet dozen 3
28 w+2
27 bet dozen 3
30 w+2
22 bet dozen 3
7 L-1
8 L -1 cycle defined by dozen 1
3 bet dozen 1
27 L1, bet dozen 1
5 w+2
15

Cheers

[Tamino]

The NEXT spin where the  ball drops brings us back to reality. Past spins are   just history

[Drazen]

Whichever part of the table I analyzed, I am seeing certain strong ratios between cycles. And they are pretty much constant.

So does ti mean deviations are weaker and we are more safe to apply some progression and MM maybe, although still without an edge? Not sure.

The example I gave is just an effort to be in the line what is explained here recently. Of course as we see in videos Pri is not playing this way, and she is using 2 dozens.

Even the losing video seems to have the same principle of targeting bets, so I wouldnt say it is made to deliberately lose as it may seem at first. It probably has its own story.

Cheers

[Tomla021]

drazen --I attempted  something along the same lines as you did