Random Thoughts

[Drazen]

The idea is, to "travel" from the top (first spin) to the end of a branch, you have to multiply the probabilities.

I think that what Priyanka shared is extremely important: 

The probability on any dozen is of course 1/3. But Under the condition of a repeat, the probability is "suddenly" 17/27.

This "phenomena" has a certain name an applications. Bayes could tell you more about this!

The relevance for roulette remains to be seen, but admit: it is fascinating!

Btw: there are many other imbalances. Priyanka showed you some...

Hope this helps a little bit.

Grts rrbb

Am I the only one who think this might be important and maybe give new insights?

What phenomena is there about? Something that hasnt been mentioned by now?

Best

Drazen

[Tomla021]

yes that seems like an important idea Drazen

[falkor2k15]

What does "condition of a repeat" mean?

[Priyanka]

What phenomena is there about

Nothing strange or new. Going to bayes site it is link:://:.roulettician.com/probability1.html#mozTocId598749

[falkor2k15]

Nothing strange or new. Going to bayes site it is link:://:.roulettician.com/probability1.html#mozTocId598749

Just out of curiosity where did you and Bayes study Maths? Are you guys both pretty hard dicks, i.e. PhDs, i.e. highly indoctrinated into the Matrix? Sorry, this probably sounds offensive, but it's not meant to... not as dangerous as Turner fighting with Steve. RouletteGhost, if you are reading, please don't get involved... restrain yourself and wait for my next comment, OK? 

[Turner]

not as dangerous as Turner fighting with Steve

lol...Im not fighting with Steve

Steves a cool guy. You can have a heated discussion with him. Nothing seems to phase him

[falkor2k15]

Damn, instead of "indoctrinated" I meant to say "integrated"... wrong word... my bad.   

[Turner]

Damn, instead of "indoctrinated" I meant to say "integrated"... wrong word... my bad.   

Im glad you explained "hard dick"

Its new to me.

meaning PHDs that is

[RouletteGhost]

A different view point is perceived as fighting

[winkel]

Am I the only one who think this might be important and maybe give new insights?

What phenomena is there about? Something that hasnt been mentioned by now?

Best

Drazen

Hi drazen,

years ago I showed this at VLS: link:://:.vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=13004.0

[Drazen]

Priyanka and winkel

Many thanks for pointing this out

Cheers

[Priyanka]

years ago

I read the entire post. It is a pity to see some of the responses in that post and you seem to have done a great job of handling them. 

[RouletteGhost]

I read the entire post. It is a pity to see some of the responses in that post and you seem to have done a great job of handling them. 

I wonder who Landis might be

:rolls eyes:

[donik7777]

Hello Priyanka!

I'd like ask what your approach have higher winrate EC, dozen, quads or doublestreets?

Greetings.

[falkor2k15]

Why does Priyanka open up her first 2 Quads videos in such a different way? If she's using VdW then it should be detectable in these first few spins:



She usually plays the first way, but in the 2nd video she missed out the 2nd bet after a win, and then she played opposite. There was some discussion before about playing VdW "opposite" to try to stop the AP from forming. One key theme throughout her Quads play is that the 2nd bet of each cycle (spin 2) is sometimes opposite, and in the one example above, no bet at all. All other bets @ spins 1,3,4 are pretty much consistent except after a loss. So how is VdW being applied when winning? Something to do with the 2nd spin only? It can't be based on the defining quad because here we only have 1 result to work with: different.