Random Thoughts

[falkor2k15]

If VdW is being applied at the spin level then CW/CCW is not really applicable with 4 quad variables, so that just leaves "same"/"different":



VdW could be being used similar to the above, but this would imply that Priyanka isn't always looking for support for the AP to form when there is only 1 s/d result - as long as there is no danger of an AP forming against her bet selections when there is 2 or more s/d results in sequence - hence the next spin could complete the AP. However, this theory is far from proven yet since there's 1 bet above (in purple) that I feel should have been played.

[falkor2k15]

The 3rd quads video has yet another different opening:



It may be that VdW is not being used at this early stage, and since Priyanka is thought to use virtual wins and losses, perhaps these bets are based on running totals of S/D or Cycle Lengths?



Video 1 (2nd in the above)
s/d = 1/2 then 2/3
CL =  2 then 2

Video 2 (1st in the above)
s/d = 0/4 then 1/6
CL = 3 then 3

Video 3 (3rd in the above)
s/d = 1/3 then 1/6
CL = 3 then 3

The cycle length is the same on the last 2 so it could be to do with same/different on individual spins? Otherwise I think we've exhausted all possibilities?

[Tomla021]

I have all ways believed that same and different are a big clue, follow 1 time

[falkor2k15]

Here's a transcript of all the Quads videos:

Video 5: link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=4dVbiXMIipI

Same/Diff.	Defined by	Cycle	Number	Quad	Win/Lose	Comments
			29	4
			3	1
	1	411	9	1		End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			26	3	W	Bet last 2 quads
D	3	133	27	3	W	End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			4	1	W	Bet last 2 quads
S	3	313	27	3	W	End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			32	4	W	Bet last 2 quads
			18	1	L
D	1	3411	1	1
S	1	11	7	1		End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			28	4	W
			27	3
D	3	1433	24	3		End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			5	1	W
D	1	311	7	1		End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			28	4	W	Bet last 2 quads
S	1	141	2	1	W	End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			15	2	W	Bet last 2 quads
			31	4	L
D	4	1244	30	4
			14	2
S	4	424	29	4		End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
S	4	44	31	4	L
S	4	44	36	4
S	4	44	35	4
			5	1
			11	2
			20	3
D	3	41233	23	3
S	3	33	23	3
S	3	33	23	3
			1	1
D	1	311	9	1
			27	3		Bet opposite of last 2 quads
D	3	133	19	3	W	End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			7	1	W	Bet last 2 quads
			15	2	L
D	2	3122	10	2		End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
S	2	22	16	2	L
S	2	22	12	2
S	2	22	10	2
			4	1
			26	3
S	2	2132	16	2
S	2	22	15	2
			22	3
			31	4
D	3	2343	25	3
			9	1		Bet opposite of last 2 quads
			11	2	W	Bet last 3 quads
S	3	3123	23	3	W	End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
S	3	33	25	3	L
			14	2		Bet opposite of last 2 quads
			2	1	W	Bet last 3 quads
D	1	3211	5	1	W	End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			29	4	W	Bet opposite of last 2 quads
			20	3	W	Bet last 3 quads
S	1	1431	2	1	W	End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			24	3	W	Bet last 2 quads
			16	2	W	Bet last 3 quads
D	2	1322	12	2	W	FINISHED

Video 6: link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=LKjvj4FQVuU

Same/Diff.	Defined by	Cycle	Number	Quad	Win/Lose	Comments
			17	2
			25	3
			9	1
	3	2313	22	3		End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			18	2	W
			35	4		Bet last 3 quads
D	4	3244	33	4	W	End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			14	2	W	Bet opposite of last 2 quads
			3	1	W
S	4	4214	34	4		End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			6	1	W	Bet opposite of last 2 quads
S	4	414	35	4	W	End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			9	1	W
D	1	11	9	1		End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			21	3	W	Bet last 2 quads
D	3	133	25	3	W	End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			16	2	W	Bet last 2 quads
			6	1	L
D	1	3211	8	1		End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
S	1	11	7	1	L
S	1	11	4	1
S	1	11	3	1
S	1	11	8	1
			13	2
D	2	122	17	2
			26	3		Bet last 2 quads
			5	1	L
D	1	2311	1	1
			20	3
D	3	133	24	3
			33	4		Bet last 2 quads
S	3	343	19	3	W	End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			6	1	W	Bet last 2 quads
			34	4	L
			13	2
D	2	31422	17	2		End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
S	2	22	12	2
			35	4
			8	1
D	1	2411	1	1
			23	3
S	1	131	2	1		End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			33	4	W	Bet last 2 quads
D	4	144	33	4	W	End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			22	3	W	Bet last 2 quads
			16	2	L
D	3	4323	24	3		End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			9	1	W
S	3	313	24	3		End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			29	4	W	Bet last 2 quads
			14	2	L
D	2	3422	13	2		End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			20	3	W
			34	4		Bet last 3 quads
			5	1	L
D	1	23411	1	1		End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			19	3	W
S	1	131	4	1		End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			16	2	W	Bet last 2 quads
			29	4	L
D	4	1244	30	4		End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			3	1	W
			12	2		Bet last 3 quads
D	2	4122	17	2	W	End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
				1	W	Bet opposite of last 2 quads
			27	3	W	Bet last 3 quads
D	3	2133	24	3	W	FINISHED

Video 7: link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=5VUUfwkFilI

Same/Diff.	Defined by	Cycle	Number	Quad	Win/Lose	Comments
			23	3
			28	4
			17	2
	2	3422	16	2		End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			24	3	W	Bet opposite of last 2 quads
			30	4	W	Bet last 3 quads
D	3	2343	23	3	W	End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			15	2	W	Bet opposite of last 2 quads
S	3	323	25	3	L	End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			32	4	W
			10	2		Bet last 3 quads
S	3	3423	26	3	W	End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
S	3	33	22	3	L
			30	4		Bet opposite of last 2 quads
S	3	343	25	4	L
D	4	44	25	4
			5	1
			14	2
D	2	4122	13	2
			6	1		Bet opposite of last 2 quads
S	2	212	16	2	L
			23	3
D	3	233	25	3		End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			2	1	W	Bet last 2 quads
D	1	311	5	1	W	End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			31	4	W	Bet last 2 quads
			22	3	L
D	3	1433	21	3		End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			17	2	W
			34	4		Bet last 3 quads
D	2	3243	15	2		End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			30	4	W	Bet opposite of last 2 quads
			24	3	W	Bet last 3 quads
D	3	2433	21	3	W	End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			2	1	W	Bet opposite of last 2 quads
			31	4	W	Bet last 3 quads
D	1	3141	9	1	W	End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			31	4	W	Bet opposite of last 2 quads
			22	3	W	Bet last 3 quads
D	4	1434	32	4	W	End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
S	4	44	36	4	L
			34	4
			4	1
S	4	414	28	4
			10	2		Bet last 2 quads
D	2	422	17	2	W	End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
S	2	22	17	2	L
			29	4		Bet last 2 quads
			26	3	L
D	4	2434	33	4
			3	1
			10	2		Bet last 3 quads
D	2	4122	18	2	W	End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			9	1	W	Bet opposite of last 2 quads
			10	3	L	Bet quads 1,3,4
			34	4	W
D	1	21341	4	1		End of cycle: Bet quads 1,2,4
			24	3	L
			30	4		Bet quads 1,2,3
D	3	1343	24	3	W	End of cycle: Bet quads 1,2,4
			32	4	W	Bet last 2 quads
			13	2	L
S	3	3423	27	3		End of cycle: Bet quads 1,2,4
			14	2	W
			36	4		Bet last 3 quads
S	3	3243	22	3	W	End of cycle: Bet quads 1,2,4
			34	4	W	Bet opposite of last 2 quads
D	4	344	30	4	L	End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			13	2	W
S	4	424	30	4		End of cycle: Bet all the other quads
			10	2	W	Bet last 2 quads
			12	2	W	FINISHED

Video 9: link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=C5rHlShQm1k

Same/Diff.	Defined by	Cycle	Number	Quad	Win/Lose	Comments
			9	1
			36	4
			26	3
	4	1434	33	4
			2	1
			24	3
D	3	4133	24	3
			1	1		Bet opposite of last 2 quads
D	1	311	7	1	L
			12	2		Bet opposite of last 2 quads
			29	4	W
D	4	1244	34	4
			19	3		Bet opposite of last 2 quads
			17	2	W
			3	1
S	4	43214	32	4
S	4	44	34	4
			15	2		Bet opposite of last 2 quads
			4	1	W
S	4	4214	36	4
			22	3		Bet opposite of last 2 quads
S	4	434	30	4	L
			19	3		Bet opposite of last 2 quads
D	3	433	26	3	L
S	3	33	21	3
S	3	33	19	3		Bet last quad
			12	2	L
D	2	322	18	2		Bet last quad
			5	1	L
			31	4
S	2	2142	11	2		Bet last quad
			4	1	L
D	1	211	8	1
			21	3		Bet last 2 quads
S	1	131	7	1	W
			19	3		Bet last 2 quads
			10	2	W
			30	4
D	2	13242	11	2
			4	1		Bet last 2 quads
			24	3	L
D	1	2131	8	1
			21	3		Bet last 2 quads
D	3	133	22	3
			2	1		Bet last 2 quads
D	1	311	2	1	W
			12	2		Bet last 2 quads
D	2	122	16	2	W
S	2	22	15	2
			28	4		Bet last 2 quads
			9	1	L
			21	3
S	2	24132	18	2
			3	1		Bet last 2 quads
S	2	212	11	2	W
			23	3		Bet last 2 quads
			4	1	L
D	3	2313	22	3
			7	1		Bet last 2 quads
D	1	311	5	1	W
			21	3		Bet last 2 quads
			35	4	L
S	1	1341	2	1
S	1	11	1	1
			19	3		Bet last 2 quads
S	1	131	4	1	W
			18	2		Bet last 2 quads
S	1	121	1	1	W
			22	3		Bet last 2 quads
			35	4	L
D	3	1343	22	3
		33	23	3
			29	4		Bet last 2 quads
D	4	344	36	4	W
			8	1		Bet last 2 quads
D	1	411	1	1	W
			19	3		Bet last 2 quads
			34	4	L
D	3	1343	22	3
			32	4		Bet last 2 quads
D	4	344	34	4	W
			21	3		Bet last 2 quads
D	3	433	22	3	W
			6	1		Bet last 2 quads
D	1	311	5	1	W	FINISHED

Video 10: link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=TwOiBydJJF0

Same/Diff.	Defined by	Cycle	Number	Quad	Win/Lose	Comments
			25	3
			6	1
			34	4
	4	3144	29	4
			21	3
			17	2
D	3	4323	25	3
			6	1		Bet opposite of last 2 quads
D	1	311	1	1	L
			25	3		Bet opposite of last 2 quads
D	3	133	27	3	L
			36	4
D	4	344	29	4
			11	2		Bet last 2 quads
			22	3	L
S	4	4234	35	4
			5	1		Bet last 2 quads
D	1	411	1	1	W
S	1	11	2	1
			31	4		Bet last 2 quads
S	1	141	5	1	W
S	1	11	5	1
S	1	11	7	1		Bet last quad
S	1	11	5	1	W	Bet last quad
S	1	11	1	1	W	Bet last quad
S	1	11	5	1	W	Bet last quad
			32	4	L
S	1	141	4	1		Bet last quad
S	1	11	1	1	W	Bet last quad
			23	3	L
			11	2
D	3	1323	25	3		Bet last quad
S	3	33	21	3	W	Bet last quad
			34	4	L
			18	2
D	2	3422	14	2		Bet last quad
			30	4	L
D	4	244	29	4		Bet last quad
			12	2	L
D	2	422	15	2
S	2	22	12	2
			34	4		Bet last 2 quads
S	2	242	16	2	W
			9	1		Bet last 2 quads
D	1	211	2	1	W
			16	2		Bet last 2 quads
			31	4	L
D	4	1244	28	4
			3	1		Bet last 2 quads
S	4	414	36	4	W
S	4	44	30	4
			13	2		Bet last 2 quads
D	2	422	16	2	W
S	2	22	16	2
S	2	22	18	2		Bet last quad
			27	3	L
D	3	233	23	3		Bet last quad
			21	3	W	FINISHED

[Tomla021]

lot of multiple wins shown WWWL  SPACE WWL , after a  Different then a Same I think Pri bets for a Same

[falkor2k15]

lot of multiple wins shown WWWL  SPACE WWL , after a  Different then a Same I think Pri bets for a Same

I'm not even sure VdW is even being used in those quads videos - unless for a couple of decision if that? It's possible that Priyanka may have only used VdW in video 1 and that non-random cycles are enough to gain edge in the later videos. I think the different opening bets is based on aiming to repeat on specific cycle lengths - later on specific defining quads. And it's possible that one bet was missed by mistake, hence there was no bet in one vid.

I'm going to tag on the dozens video here, albeit without the color-coding.Note: this video is designed to lose!

Same/Diff.	Defined by	Cycle	Number	Dozen	Win/Lose	Comments
			15	2
			32	3
	2	232	21	2		End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
			7	1	W	Bet the last 2 dozens
d	1	211	10	1	W	End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
s	1	11	11	1	L
			16	2		Bet the last 2 dozens
			29	3	L
s	1	1231	3	1
			23	2
d	2	122	24	2		End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
s	2	22	20	2	L
			4	1		Bet the last 2 dozens
			32	3	L
d	3	2133	32	3
			7	1
			14	2
d	2	3122	24	2		End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
			36	3	W
			9	1
s	2	2312	24	2		End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
			4	1	W
d	1	211	12	1		End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
			19	2	W
d	2	122	24	2		End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
s	2	22	14	2	L
s	2	22	23	2
			7	1
s	2	212	22	2
s	2	22	21	2
s	2	22	16	2
			28	3
s	2	232	21	2
			6	1		Bet the last 2 dozens
			32	3	L
d	1	2131	2	1
			26	3
			23	2		Bet the last 2 dozens
s	1	1321	3	1	L
			22	2
			36	3		Bet the other 2 dozens
s	1	1231	1	1	W	End of Cycle. Bet the last 2 dozens
s	1	11	6	1	W	End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
s	1	11	6	1	L
			28	3
			15	2
d	3	1323	35	3
s	3	33	34	3
			13	2
s	3	323	36	3
			19	2		Bet the last 2 dozens
s	3	323	29	3	W	End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
s	3	33	35	3	L
			1	1		Bet the last 2 dozens
				2	L	FINISHED

[falkor2k15]

I must say there's some very good information in these Random Thoughts topics (it's beyond GUT!), but it's taken me months to grasp the principles due to a lack of context to link each one together. If the context was there in the beginning then it could have been understood in a day instead of 9 months, so I am working on a new topic/article titled Random Thoughts: A Simplified Overview. This will place all the buzzwords like "Sequences", "Events", "Combinations", "Stitching Bets", "Imbalances", "Dependencies", "Creating Bias", "Parallel Games" into a single model that is built up of all those principles. Random Thoughts: A Concise Reference (version 3) will also be published with #hashtags and structured/filtered with a fine-tooth comb.

[falkor2k15]

The 3rd quads video has yet another different opening:



It may be that VdW is not being used at this early stage, and since Priyanka is thought to use virtual wins and losses, perhaps these bets are based on running totals of S/D or Cycle Lengths?



Video 1 (2nd in the above)
s/d = 1/2 then 2/3
CL =  2 then 2

Video 2 (1st in the above)
s/d = 0/4 then 1/6
CL = 3 then 3

Video 3 (3rd in the above)
s/d = 1/3 then 1/6
CL = 3 then 3

The cycle length is the same on the last 2 so it could be to do with same/different on individual spins? Otherwise I think we've exhausted all possibilities?

The following quote most likely explains why we have 3 different opening decisions (dark purple) - normal bet, opposite bet and no bet:
"There are different bets at different points in the cycle, right? After the first dozen, let's say it is a 1, then we should consider a bet on 1 again because at this point there is only one choice to close out the cycle. But should we bet at this point? We should look for some support for this bet on the first dozen from elsewhere - some other non-random measure. For example maybe the VdW - although not sure how to do that.
...
What can we say about the very first betting opportunity? What possible support can we get for this? Either positive or negative because if positive then we play the bet but if negative then we can consider playting the OTHER 2 dozens - but ONLY if there is strong suppport for either. Where can that support come from?"

[dimsun]

Here's a transcript of all the Quads videos:

Lot work maybe find out nothing falkor2k15.  You busy beaver to. 

[falkor2k15]

Let's continue with this problem anyway, as Priyanka has clearly put in more effort than me in trying to communicate the solution covertly:
"I really feel that the important things we need to focus on right now are, firstly, the second non-random event (assuming the VdW on the EC's is the first) and the way in which these 2 events are put together in the betting plan. Note the word EVENT. I believe that we need to think of the VdW theorem that Pri gave us as an example of an event to be also a good example of the meaning of the word EVENT in this context. We need to find another such event that fits with either the groupings of 9 numbers (which Pri calls a quad) or perhaps 6-lines, maybe even dozens although I personally don't think it is this."

We are looking for an event, which is usually a "more than 1 spin" sequence or combination that is not equally likely. This could be a cycle length, definition or a series of stitched bets - with subtle emphasis on lines.

"I have tried various things and have not been able to figure out a way to induce dependencies between parallel games. All thumbs down.
There is one last hope left though which am checking now. It goes like this. It is stiching together of bets. While playing quads I have realised that 1-9, 10-18, 19-27, 28-36 forms quads in terms of spins. But the other way to make quads is by combining results of two spins. Like combining Two ECs like Low(1-18) and high numbers(19-36). The combinations are LL, HH, LH and HL. Here I could potentially have two streams one as a stream of quads with teh above combinations and other as a stream of ECs made of L and H. Because they are formed of same elements they are dependent. I am sure there is some playability I can figure out between these two streams and cycles, so working on it. "

The above is reminiscent of the unsolved simultaneous EC + Dozens VdW example that was posted nearer to the beginning of the topic, but here stitching High/Low as "events" to resemble Quads is not stated in the context of VdW - but in the context of 2 streams as parallel games thereby creating dependency to overcome a Dead-heat or Dead-run. This could still be the VdW "support" that we are looking for with regards to decisions on quads, but it's not clear how it works even in it's original context, so to extend that as VdW support is even more abstract at this stage.

"in Priyanka quad videos, any ideas how she use DS as VDW in her quads bet selections?"

It's looking more likely that we should look towards to the Double Streets instead of the ECs - but as an event I'm not sure?

"Pri said early on in the other thread that Dozens and EC's (and possibly 6-lines or was it quads) COULD be played with an edge using VdW and other non-random techniques such as repeating dozens in a cycle and so on."

"Actually, we also have to discover the 2nd non-random event don't we? I know it is probably on the 6-lines but it can't be VdW because this would be far too complex - even the dozens have a sequence length of 27 and nobody is able to accurately find all the AP's in that on the fly. Does anybody have any idea what the 2nd non-random event might be?"

Not much help other than continuing the emphasis on lines.

"But I don't think that is all. I think there is another component that has to be added. Possibly another non-random sequence? One with a lower strike rate because of a smaller coverage perhaps? Consider what he hinted at with High/Low combined with dozens or perhaps six-lines. Or perhaps the quads (9 numbers as I understand it - personally I've always thought quads were 4 numbers, corners basically, but whatever) are the basic and the High/Low is used when a bet is ambiguous - the dead run situation. I see no reason why, when a dead run situation presents itself, that you can't, at that time, look back and create a sequence starting point that gives you a bet on this spin. After all, the VdW theorem says ANY 9 number sequence so why not create them on the fly as and when needed as the "other" bet?"

More clues - but more in the context of dead-runs as opposed to looking for support for betting quads normal, opposite or not betting at all.

"What if we bet the last 3 hit lines in the dozen, instead of the whole dozen.  If a cycle ends with dozen 2 as dominant, bet the last 3 hit lines in dozen 2 on the first bet.  If dozen 1 hits next, bet the last 3 hit lines in dozen 1 and 2.

Seems like there is always 1 line in a dozen that stays cold.  Thought this might increase the odds of a hit better."

This could have some relevance regarding "lower strike rate" in the previous quote, but it's not clear if it can help us with decisions on quads.

"the double streets, in three spins what is the probability of getting 3 unique double streets or the double streets not being the same? It is a over 55%. Surprising, but that is the truth. So chances of getting 134, 156, etc where all double streets are different are better than chances of getting 121, 555, 556, 322 etc. Can that be used to our advantage during the play where some steps are random and some steps are non-random. Yes definitely."

Another stat besides VdW that might offer support in some way.

Priyanka suggests that we should never play randomly and look for support before attempting to close off a quads cycle and to even bet opposite if VdW demands it compared to the original bet we had in mind, but usually Pri only bets opposite when there is a cycle length of 3 and bets normal when there is a cycle length that is less than 3. Of course, there are the odd exceptions to these rules, and rarely is there no bet at all on the 2nd spin, unless following a losing streak and waiting for virtual wins/losses. However, it doesn't appear she is relying on VdW as per what is being preached - or it could be that cycles ending in length 3 happens to coincide with more VdW data offering support for the opposite bet.

[falkor2k15]

VdW: "What is the applicability in roulette. Sorry, I don’t have an answer. It is yet to be seen, but I have an inkling that this versatility could be put to use somehow when we are having two variables that do not essentially have a 50-50 probability appearing, but could or might give an advantage when lining up in a VdW sequence".




H/L, DZ, QUAD, LINES
1 2 2 3
2 3 3 5
1 1 1 2
2 2 3 4
1 2 2 1

d d d d
d d d d
d d d d
d s d d

No bet - why?


H/L, DZ, QUAD LINES
2 3 4 5
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 2
2 3 3 5

d d d d
s s s d
d d d d

Quad 3+1 = normal bet. Why bet here and why bet normal and not opposite?


H/L, DZ, QUAD, LINES
2 2 3 4
2 3 4 5
1 2 2 3
1 2 2 3
2 2 3 4

s d d d
d d d d
s s s s
d s d d

2+3 = normal bet
1+4 = opposite bet

Why bet opposite? What is the VdW support for quads 1+4...?

[Drazen]

However, it doesn't appear she is relying on VdW as per what is being preached

Falklor I really admire to you efforts, and I gave you applause for that.

I am sure she is not relying on VdW exclusively as you are attempting to do all the time.

Did you missed those posts? I highlighted them recently.

Best

Drazen

[falkor2k15]

Thanks Drazen! Unfortunately, I'm unable to find those recent posts you refer to - do you have a link?

[Drazen]

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17013.75

Reply #89

[falkor2k15]

Cheers Drazen!

The last word on this was that Priyanka was working on a Quads system that doesn't need VdW, and with constant ratios like these across multiple data sets I hope to gain some basic edge by the end of the week:

Defined by 1 to 1: 42 2: 18 3: 14 4: 16
Defined by 2 to 1: 17 2: 70 3: 24 4: 15
Defined by 3 to 1: 16 2: 53 3: 68 4: 22
Defined by 4 to 1: 16 2: 22 3: 15 4: 46

Defined by 1 to 1: 49 2: 16 3: 17 4: 17
Defined by 2 to 1: 12 2: 58 3: 18 4: 15
Defined by 3 to 1: 17 2: 39 3: 64 4: 21
Defined by 4 to 1: 20 2: 13 3: 19 4: 55

1 Cycle Lengths to 1: 17 2: 39 3: 28 4: 9
2 Cycle Lengths to 1: 40 2: 82 3: 53 4: 11
3 Cycle Lengths to 1: 27 2: 53 3: 35 4: 10
4 Cycle Lengths to 1: 8 2: 13 3: 9 4: 3

1 Cycle Lengths to 1: 19 2: 47 3: 28 4: 9
2 Cycle Lengths to 1: 42 2: 54 3: 46 4: 11
3 Cycle Lengths to 1: 32 2: 38 3: 39 4: 17
4 Cycle Lengths to 1: 11 2: 14 3: 13 4: 7