Random Thoughts

[Turner]

should I meet a psychiatrist?

We should have a resident psychiatrist in the forum lol

[falkor2k15]

I'm sensing hatred in winkel's heart... he's needs to let go of all these grudges... RouletteGhost has already forgiven me - I can tell. Turner hasn't banned me for a while so I guess I am not a thorn in his side. The only thing that troubles me is winkel's lack of a sense of humour, his over-seriousness, and seemingly his inability to understand dark comedy.

Let's continue the interlude with a test to see who - using their mathematical roulette brain - can understand dark comedy, and who, instead, gets offended?  Just one simple exercise is all I am asking of you then I will post my analysis afterwards showing how I believe Priyanka is using VdW in her Quads videos - so do we have a deal, guys??? 

Jesus was in a synagogue lecturing some Jews. In the gospels story he was about to be driven over the edge of their city upon the brow of a hill, but in contrast, in the historical narrative of Josephus, it’s the Romans who are driving the Jewish people out of their own citadel! Once the verbatim link is considered, which forms a concept in itself ("driving" Jews "down" a hill/precipice from their "city"), “Physician, heal yourself” then begins to stand out as some kind of slogan for “kill themselves with their own hands” â€" but this is far from clear at first glance. To confirm the concept - and indeed the parallel - we need to look up the verse that Jesus is referring to about “Elijah and the widow” - who killed herself and her son - as a dark anti-Semitic reminder of the Roman victory at Japha and Jotapata, where the Jews committed suicide after many were driven over a cliff by the Romans. The authors require us to sometimes look up verses in other books of the bible in order to understand the joke. Jesus’ words make more sense when harmonized with Josephus in this, the first of many parallels - occurring in sequence - for at least 50 stories in the Gospels and real life events in the Jewish War.

[Scarface]

Maybe Pri is using VDW.  But the real question is does it actually give the player and edge?   

[falkor2k15]

Maybe Pri is using VDW.  But the real question is does it actually give the player and edge?   

Yeah it does give an edge when you know how to use it in the right way!

[falkor2k15]

donik7777, you have accidentally blocked me in PM - could you please unblock me so I can respond to you? Thanks.

[RouletteGhost]

I think youd get a better response if you stopped with the "i cant post it" and "delete it " attitude

[dimsun]

We should have a resident psychiatrist in the forum lol

Forum do seem have more nuts than fruitcake.

[falkor2k15]

Forum do seem have more nuts than fruitcake.

The real question is: are you able to now make better sense of Jesus' words in the gospel or not? Does everyone now understand the significance of what Jesus was teaching? So next time you hear the phrase "Physician, heal yourself" you know what it means and why that story was written...

[falkor2k15]

Did OK last night in the casino playing Quads, but was a bit shaky as it was my first time in 2 years... I had forgotten the etiquette! (also I was drunk!!)
link:://:.youtube.com/watch?v=nruw1vQOcMQ

[dimsun]

The real question is: are you able to now make better sense of Jesus' words in the gospel or not? Does everyone now understand the significance of what Jesus was teaching? So next time you hear the phrase "Physician, heal yourself" you know what it means and why that story was written...

Understanding easy, using understanding harder.

[Turner]

Understanding easy, using understanding harder.

Lol....nice !

[falkor2k15]

Understanding easy, using understanding harder.

you taking the blue pill or the red pill?

[falkor2k15]

I'm going to tag on the dozens video here, albeit without the color-coding.Note: this video is designed to lose!

Same/Diff.	Defined by	Cycle	Number	Dozen	Win/Lose	Comments
			15	2
			32	3
	2	232	21	2		End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
			7	1	W	Bet the last 2 dozens
d	1	211	10	1	W	End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
s	1	11	11	1	L
			16	2		Bet the last 2 dozens
			29	3	L
s	1	1231	3	1
			23	2
d	2	122	24	2		End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
s	2	22	20	2	L
			4	1		Bet the last 2 dozens
			32	3	L
d	3	2133	32	3
			7	1
			14	2
d	2	3122	24	2		End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
			36	3	W
			9	1
s	2	2312	24	2		End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
			4	1	W
d	1	211	12	1		End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
			19	2	W
d	2	122	24	2		End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
s	2	22	14	2	L
s	2	22	23	2
			7	1
s	2	212	22	2
s	2	22	21	2
s	2	22	16	2
			28	3
s	2	232	21	2
			6	1		Bet the last 2 dozens
			32	3	L
d	1	2131	2	1
			26	3
			23	2		Bet the last 2 dozens
s	1	1321	3	1	L
			22	2
			36	3		Bet the other 2 dozens
s	1	1231	1	1	W	End of Cycle. Bet the last 2 dozens
s	1	11	6	1	W	End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
s	1	11	6	1	L
			28	3
			15	2
d	3	1323	35	3
s	3	33	34	3
			13	2
s	3	323	36	3
			19	2		Bet the last 2 dozens
s	3	323	29	3	W	End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
s	3	33	35	3	L
			1	1		Bet the last 2 dozens
				2	L	FINISHED

I'm obviously failing in my mission to promote VdW here... can you guys not see how significant this is!? Look how many losses Priyanka was able to achieve from betting double dozens!? Double Dozens should win more but result in less net profit - but here they are manipulated to drastically lose using VdW by a sheer non-random force of nature. This is a very big deal, guys! This is no fairy tale (and Priyanka is no fairy).

[falkor2k15]

There is an important thing here around statistical advantage of same element defining the next spin. What if we remove cycles of length 1, do we see any difference in ratios. Can cycles of length 1 be exploited?  Can cycles greater than length 1 be exploited? In her video it has been shown that Priyanka avoided cycles of length 1. #TriggeringBias #Cycles
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15938.255 (page 18 )

Cycle Length		28.83%	71.17%	24.95%	37.24%	28.28%	9.54%
Cycle Length (same)				44.98%	33.41%	17.19%	4.42%
Cycle Length (different)				0.00%	42.01%	42.09%	15.90%
CL1 Ignored		30.37%	69.63%	24.95%	37.24%	28.28%	9.54%
CL1 Ignored (same)				0.00%	60.91%	35.10%	3.99%
CL1 Ignored (different)				35.84%	26.91%	25.30%	11.96%

In general, whether the cycle length is the same or different, is not affected.
Under normal circumstances cycle length 1 to 1 had the highest ratio, but now with CL1 ignored, cycle lengths 2 to 2 and 3 to 3 have increased ratios instead.
I guess that having an early repeat with cycle length 1 has also reduced, but I can't say I yet understand what the exploitative advantage is as of yet?

Although I haven't yet exhausted the stats here's all my tests I've done so far...

QUAD CYCLES CONSTANT RATIOS	(BETWEEN 2 CYCLES)
		Same	Different	1	2	3	4
Defining Quad		55.48%	44.52%
Defined by Quad 1 to Same/Different		54.50%	45.50%
Defined by Quad 2 to Same/Different		65.31%	34.69%
Defined by Quad 3 to Same/Different		48.83%	51.17%
Defined by Quad 4 to Same/Different		55.42%	44.58%
Defined by 1 to X				54.50%	15.52%	15.12%	14.86%
Defined by 2 to X				14.54%	55.84%	14.50%	15.11%
Defined by 3 to X				11.53%	33.39%	43.82%	11.26%
Defined by 4 to X				14.76%	15.63%	14.19%	55.42%
Cycle Length		28.83%	71.17%	24.95%	37.24%	28.28%	9.54%
Cycle Length (same)				44.98%	33.41%	17.19%	4.42%
Cycle Length (different)				0.00%	42.01%	42.09%	15.90%
Cycle Length X to same				24.66%	37.16%	28.13%	9.27%
Cycle Length X to different				75.34%	62.84%	71.87%	90.73%
Cycle Length 1 to X				24.66%	36.72%	29.40%	9.22%
Cycle Length 2 to X				25.47%	37.16%	27.79%	9.59%
Cycle Length 3 to X				24.25%	37.79%	28.13%	9.83%
Cycle Length 4 to X				25.76%	37.26%	27.70%	9.27%
CL1 Ignored		30.37%	69.63%	24.95%	37.24%	28.28%	9.54%
CL1 Ignored (same)				0.00%	60.91%	35.10%	3.99%
CL1 Ignored (different)				35.84%	26.91%	25.30%	11.96%
CL234 (CL1 Ignored) to same					37.14%	28.52%	9.45%
CL234 (CL1 Ignored) to different					62.86%	71.48%	90.55%
CL2 (C1 Ignored) to X				25.24%	37.14%	28.07%	9.55%
CL3 (C1 Ignored) to X				24.36%	37.58%	28.52%	9.54%
CL4 (C1 Ignored) to X				25.56%	36.60%	28.38%	9.45%
CL1 Ignored	1st spin ignored	40.47%	59.53%		49.62%	37.68%	12.71%
CL1 Ignored (same)	1st spin ignored				60.91%	35.10%	3.99%
CL1 Ignored (different)	1st spin ignored				41.94%	39.43%	18.63%
CL234 (CL1 Ignored) to same	1st spin ignored				49.68%	37.71%	12.70%
CL234 (CL1 Ignored) to different	1st spin ignored				50.32%	62.29%	87.30%
CL2 (C1 Ignored) to X	1st spin ignored				49.68%	37.54%	12.78%
CL3 (C1 Ignored) to X	1st spin ignored				49.68%	37.71%	12.61%
CL4 (C1 Ignored) to X	1st spin ignored				49.17%	38.13%	12.70%

Priyanka's last 2 videos miss out spin 1 entirely, so there may be more advantage to be gained there...

[Drazen]

Great effort Falkor

In the meantime I decided for another approach.

I traveled 2500 kilometers from my home and I moved to the island next to Priyanka. From here I plan to hunt him down and force to tell me the answer. 

Wish me well

Best

Drazen