Random Thoughts

[falkor2k15]

Pri said we can combine 2 playing positions in 1 spin.

Yeah, that was in the 2nd part of the relevant sentence:
*Multiple playing positions
*One spin

In the first part of the sentence, however, she said we can stitch via:
*Same playing position
*Two or more spins

But I don't see how playing the same position in two+ spins does anything interesting? I risked 2 units for 8.125 profit, but even with that new odd placement, there's still no edge. So do we need to write that off? Is it worth me testing multiple positions in 1 spin, or should the whole thing be scrapped till the definition of stitching bets has been clarified further and all contradictions resolved?

"It can be done by combining two or more spins of same or multiple positions or it can be done by playing multiple positions within a spin"

[Drazen]

Pri, I wish we could have a two-way conversation, I really do... I am divorcing my wife soon due to communication problems, so you can see how frustrating it is - even at work where all the deadbeats sit quiet and depressed in different corners of the office.

I am really sorry to hear you encountered such situation in your life. I was until recently also fighting with big life problems. Being desperate and depressed because of that. But it turned out all that was only because I thought so. Everything was in my head.

Then one day a total stranger sent me an e-mail and changes started to appear, like out of nowhere.

BTW have you ever heard of life coaching? I didnt had a clue what that was until recently, I met a brilliant life coach. I was brave enough to pay for the first session, although it seemed quite expensive at first. But just after the first session I saw significant shift within a week. First thing he taught me was how not to be clogged with thoughts. Only that brought me a certain relief. It seems to me you have so much on your mind and I think first you should get rid off those conspiracy theories and nonsense how Earth is flat... It will lead you pretty much to nowhere.

So if you are unhappy and would like to find a better way of thinking which might lead you to better performance in what you want to achieve in the end, you might consider in hiring one. Just a proposition. 

I'm not asking for the grail - I would just like to know what concepts you've applied to making those particular videos if it's not too much trouble.

Are you sure you dont? It seems like you do at first, and hope that Priyanka wont get it like that also. I still see all concepts nicely exposed here.

It took me some time just to figure out how all this thread is brilliantly planned, from every concept introduced, to every reply written. If you think about it, it took her years for that, as some members nicely connected some hints from a few years back too. It is not hard to see the interweaving of ideas. So why should solving of the riddle took a short time? I often wonder that.

The only problem is we might or we might not solve it in the end. That is the hardest true to face with, at least for me.

So besides you and me to all who are still trying this (if any), I wish better success in the next year.

Cheers

[Priyanka]

I wish better success in the next year

Wish you all a very happy and prosperous new year. Sometimes I used to wonder what's in a new year it is just another day and night. But as a human I figured that fresh start is always nice and anything that gives us a fresh start even if it is just notional is always welcome. Cheers

[RMore]

It's often a really good idea to make a fresh start in a project. The new year provides a nice boundary in which to do this if you are, like me, still on the hunt. My personal approach to this new start in 2017 is this - simplify.

I note Falkor's inclusion of my name in one of his earlier posts suggesting that perhaps I am withholding information - I assure you my friend, I am no further ahead than you are in this search. And also, perhaps in contradiction to my own earlier post, I am coming to the opinion that issues such as stitching and other MM techniques are mere obfuscation - they are effectively MM techniques and these, by themselves, do not provide an advantage. They may (note MAY) provide efficiencies such as minimising losing runs, maximising gains in a positive run, and so on, but by themselves will not provide an advantage. So what we need to be focusing on is the technique(s) that DO provide an advantage.

Some would argue, quite vociferously too, that no such technique exists. But where's the fun in that? I must admit that while I am frustrated by lack of progress, I do enjoy the chase. I am hopeful that 2017 will provide me with some breakthroughs and perhaps I can actually move forwards on the trail to long term success.

So I echo Pri's sentiments and wish everybody a positive and prosperous new year!

All the best
Rog

[ati]

Happy new year from me too!

Once again, I hope that this is going to be the year I wish to improve my family's and my own life. I'm patient, but as Priyanka wrote once: "time is precious."

[falkor2k15]

I am really sorry to hear you encountered such situation in your life. I was until recently also fighting with big life problems. Being desperate and depressed because of that. But it turned out all that was only because I thought so. Everything was in my head.

Then one day a total stranger sent me an e-mail and changes started to appear, like out of nowhere.

BTW have you ever heard of life coaching? I didnt had a clue what that was until recently, I met a brilliant life coach. I was brave enough to pay for the first session, although it seemed quite expensive at first. But just after the first session I saw significant shift within a week. First thing he taught me was how not to be clogged with thoughts. Only that brought me a certain relief. It seems to me you have so much on your mind and I think first you should get rid off those conspiracy theories and nonsense how Earth is flat... It will lead you pretty much to nowhere.

So if you are unhappy and would like to find a better way of thinking which might lead you to better performance in what you want to achieve in the end, you might consider in hiring one. Just a proposition.

Nice attempt at empathy, Drazen, but you are far from the truth. Keep practising hard though - you will be very good one day!

I have to disagree: being thoughtful is what leads to questioning reality and escaping our depressive zombie culture.

I would never pay for a life coach, lawyer or chiropractor - they are all con-men who will often fail to give a fixed price, duration and diagnosis/cure - the ones who feel they have a privileged position of power and authority. You could pay for a session at the church of Scientology even. But they are all simply cults/religions, where people have become corrupted by money and power. This is what leads to arrogance and ignorance. All consultants in the medical industry are the same - they are all arrogant and think they know best about health and nutrition as informed by the mainstream. Blocking out thoughts and emotions has IMO a detrimental effect on self-development.

You are part of the same culture, Drazen, so that's why you make arrogant statements like this
"I think first you should get rid off those conspiracy theories and nonsense how Earth is flat... It will lead you pretty much to nowhere."

Knowledge is the real power/healer here, and it's not to be abused, but shared. Knowing the truth is what leads to freedom and happiness. Staying in an abusive relationship is what wears us down with Narcs, Borderlines, and people with ego problems in general, who have the capacity for abuse; many of them are professional liers and manipulators. So it's about becoming more aware of the evil that exists in this world. Once you go flat there's no going back. So the more open-minded and thoughtful you are the more you can achieve enlightenment by escaping any ties to other people/groups, so there can be no guilt by association, and you can live a free life as an individual without any nasty surprises from those slaves enforcing the elite's agenda as propagated via their anthropology department though the mainstream media, etc.

Incidentally, some of the highest rates of "demons", i.e. personality disorders, in the world happens to be in India. Many are suffering from chronic feelings of emptiness, have lost their ability to feel empathy, their male/female identity in some cases even, and go around like predators looking for helpless souls to lock eyes on, and have their ego fed with narcissistic supply. They enter companies in high positions of power through their manipulation tactics, create havoc and destruction, then leave without any remorse or regret and continue their Godzilla war path elsewhere...

It took me some time just to figure out how all this thread is brilliantly planned, from every concept introduced, to every reply written. If you think about it, it took her years for that, as some members nicely connected some hints from a few years back too. It is not hard to see the interweaving of ideas. So why should solving of the riddle took a short time? I often wonder that.

The only problem is we might or we might not solve it in the end. That is the hardest true to face with, at least for me.

So besides you and me to all who are still trying this (if any), I wish better success in the next year.

It's nothing to be proud of - there is no merit to deliberate vagueness, confusion and evasion - they are all forms of abuse. Wasting people's time with blocked communication and contradictions is no achievement, and will bring no legacy. The magicians in the movie, The Prestige, likewise use trickery, careful planning, ritualistic behavior - with a sinister goal in mind. Again, this is aimed towards self-importance, as they possess no real merit - nor do they know the cure to their personal problems, and feel worthless inside. Deception is not the answer.

I will be knocking this Random Thoughts on the head after Q1 2017, as there is insufficient information content to continue regardless of any delusions Pri and co. may have - the transmission of knowledge up till now has been sadly inadequate. And it's not my comprehension skills that are to blame; my concise reference documentation is on version 4 without a single eureka moment, and it's doubtful anybody will ever again put in the same amount of time/effort that I did on this project. Over the past year I've always given Pri the benefit of the doubt and never made any assumptions from the point onwards where Pri asserted his/her position through evidence. So my above statements are carefully informed through comprehensive testing and research. This topic needs me like my depressed zombie colleagues at work need me to stop them drifting into zombie-mode and keep them alert - the reason I got 5/5 for my appraisal - but soon I won't be here anymore, and this topic will die a death, as I need to re-direct my positive energy more towards my new years' resolution; therefore, I wish you a Happy New Year - may you all first discover enlightenment before anything else. Assumptions is a sign of stupidity, so try not to make too many this year - particularly when it comes to the Globe and whether Roulette can be beaten or not. Apologies I haven't been able to "find space" to offer Drazen any empathy, for soon I will be abandoning this to Pri and her aliases through lack of genuine all-round contribution. 2017 will take something better than string theory to join all Pri's concepts together, as there are no observable strands floating about in this parallel universe.

[buffalowizard]

There's been plenty of people saying that this thread has been like finding gold at the end of a rainbow ... purposefully leading people down dead ends etc. To be honest, 90% of it is utter nonsense - rafts of long winded tripe

Hey ho, some just don't want to listen

[Drazen]

Apologies I haven't been able to "find space" to offer Drazen any empathy, for soon I will be abandoning this to Pri and her aliases through lack of genuine all-round contribution. 2017 will take something better than string theory to join all Pri's concepts together, as there are no observable strands floating about in this parallel universe.

No need to apologize Giles. I understand. Empathy is not reserved for bitter lives full of suspicion in every possible part.

And leaving aside Pri-s ideas makes perfect sense here. You should be revealing the worlds conspiracies and find inner peace with it. I reckon revealing Pri-s riddle is much harder and less rewarding comparing to a good conspiracy theory which the world is full of.

Best

[Priyanka]

Falkor- I don't want to contain your enthusiasm. Why getting confused in the videos and get lost when the concepts has been clearly explained. I don't want to say what is the right or wrong way, because I know only my way and other ways may be right or wrong.

I shall share one final string in this whole piece and my way is not as complex as Russian dolls and outer circles. For this final string you need to look at the post by rrbb titled

Basically it is the ordinality of numbers. Ordinality for people who don't know is nothing but the order in which numbers are positioned in a set.  Put it simply in the explanation of dozens consider the order in which the dozens appear as follows;

3,2,3,3,1,3,2,1,3,3,3,1,1

If you have to right it in positions it will read like

3,3,1,1,3,2,3,3,3,1,1,2,1

Let us assume that repeat of the last two dozen is more likely than the dozen that is sleeping and combine it with cycles to say that you are more likely to see the defining dozen appearing again. That makes it clear that you should not play for cycles of 3 position or one should ignore 3 position when it occurs.

Look at the results.
0,0,0,2,-1,-1,-2,0,0,0,2,-1,1

This is one more step in the direction of how I play.

[RMore]

Thanks Pri. May I ask - I get a slightly different string for the positions. Only one small difference - I get "2" for the third position rather than "1". Have I got it wrong?

3,3,2,1,3,2,3,3,3,1,1,2,1

Not sure how you derive the results string yet - need to study that for a bit. But just checking - does the correction above change it?

thanks
Rog

[falkor2k15]

3,2,3,3,1,3,2,1,3,3,3,1,1

If you have to right it in positions it will read like

3,3,1,1,3,2,3,3,3,1,1,2,1

Old news - see reply #1 re: "Reverse Order" constant, which could be applied on dozens, Defining Element, Cycle Length, Order, gaps, streaks...
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=18233.msg168401#msg168401

I shall share one final string in this whole piece and my way is not as complex as Russian dolls and outer circles.

Here's Pri's reply #694 to this topic:
"Dozen 1 is no longer 12 numbers but it is 14 numbers.  Dozen 2 is no longer 12 numbers but 16 numbers. Dozen 3 is no longer 12 numbers but 6 numbers. But the payouts don't change. All the dozens still give you 2 to 1.

That's the target you need to work on. Sorry can't get more explicit than this."
Pri talks in riddles and claims she doesn't use Outer Cycles, but the above ratio, 16-14-6, happens to be the Outer Cycles ratio(!):

Inner CL1 = 33%
Inner CL2 = 44%
Inner CL3 = 23%

Outer CL1 = 1165 = 40%
Outer CL2 = 1270 = 43%
Outer CL3 = 485 = 17%

14 = 39%
16 = 44%
6 = 17%

Therefore, Pri is misleading everyone with muffled hints that try to mess with our heads and lead nowhere, including the discouragement of using outer cycles as too complex, when in fact that could be the very key to creating dependency - but with inner cycles there is none. That's why this topic is filled with endless contradictions; any requests for clarification is ignored.

Let me show you the power of Outer Cycles/Russian Dolls that Pri appears to be mocking:



The maximum cluster of inner CL2s in this sequence is merely 5 in a row, but as the "Defining Cycle Length" to dependent Outer Cycles it occurs double that frequency @ 10 times in a row:



Inner sequence (Outer relationship in bold): 3122 232 22 212 22 233 322 212 212 232 22 232 211 133 311
Inner sequence (Outer relationship in bold): CL3 CL2 CL1 CL2 CL1 CL2 CL2 CL2 CL2 CL2 CL1 CL2 CL2 CL2 CL2

What's more: the "Defining Dozen" of each Outer Cycle remains dominant throughout the next series of Outer Cycles in a row in terms defining most of it's inner Cycles for all lengths (1) as well as total occurrences (2).

[Priyanka]

Have I got it wrong?

You have it right.

[RayManZ]

Could you explain the postions thingy? I don't understand. Did i miss a post somewhere?

[Priyanka]

Could you explain the postions thingy? I don't understand. Did i miss a post somewhere?

Pls refer this post. It's discussed in detail.

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17115.0

Will be glad to expand if the concept is not clear.

For all readers, pls pursue these concepts at your own risk. I promised I will not bloviate without proof and am reiterating this, pursuing this will only put a different take on playing roulette and may or may not lead to a winning game.

[praline]

Will be glad to expand if the concept is not clear.

It would be wonderfull. If you have some time, please expand it a little. It's easy to create those releated streams but the  part about repeats on those streams is a little unclear.