method by turbogenius

[RouletteGhost]

I am not sure who he is, I know he was around before my time

heard he had a website etc etc

I'm sure he will see this and I'm sure this will be copy and pasted in the gambling forums forum

whatever

anyway I really really liked this method and wanted to know what you guys thought

it is betting the sleeping dozen and column but only 4 numbers....and to my surprise it looked liked it worked well

have not tested it in depth but I will in a couple of days

the method:
look at farthest back dozen
look at farthest back column

bet the 4 numbers

example
2   (doz 1, col 2)
32 (doz 3, col 2)
19 (doz 2, col 1) (furthest back dozen, dozen 2)
27 (doz 3, col 3) (furthest back column, column 3.

focus on 19 and 27, because 19 is furthest back dozen and 27 is furthest back column

we will bet the 4 numbers in dozen 2, column 3

bet 15, 18, 21, 24


Is it fallacy? Is it as good as any other 4 number bet? Dunno

[Chrisbis]

How far are you looking back?
......
& in your example, why is 27 not the furthest back dozen?

[RouletteGhost]

Doz 2 is the furthest unique dozen

Col 3 is furthest unique column

If we played furthest back in general wed go back a trillion spins?

[RouletteGhost]

testing this evening

works wonders

beginners luck maybe

example:

2 newest spin
34
22
21

here you would bet the 3rd column in dozen 2
why? dozen 1 is newest spin, dozen 3 is 2nd newest spin, that means the oldest dozen to show is dozen 2 so we focus in dozen 2. also number 2 is column 2, and 34 is column 1, that means furthest column back to show is column 3
so we bet dozen 2 column 3
the #s would be 15, 18, 21, 24

Mr. J is on to somethin with bet 4 numbers max

I got 3 hits fast, which when betting 4 numbers is nice profit

[Steve]

You need to think beyond results from a few spins. All of my earlier systems would almost always profit in the first few hundred spins. But when they eventually had a bad session, the profits were gone.

Then I tried to use milder progressions, but all that did was make the swings less severe. ie instead of losing everything in 100 spins, I'd lose everything in 1,000 spins. The result was still the same: loss.

I dont know how else to explain it. Jump into a huge frying pan. No matter which position you sit or lay in, you'll get burned. Jump up for a while, but then you come back down and get burnt. The only solution is jump out of the damn frying pan, because everything you were doing in it was the same crap. In the case of roulette, you need to look at ways of increasing accuracy of predictions. There is absolutely no way around it. This is so clear once it is understood. Believe me when you understand it you'll look back at all the wasted time.

You dont need to increase prediction accuracy my way (typical AP). I'm sure there are other ways of doing it too, which are not yet discovered. Try something NEW. Realize almost everyone is still in the frying pan expecting a new position will stop them getting burned.

[RouletteGhost]

I know what you are saying

But there must be a clever way to profit without predicting where the ball will land

[Steve]

But there must be a clever way to profit without predicting where the ball will land

It's ALL about where the ball lands. You cannot ignore the winning number. It needs to be predicted.

Once you understand why, you understand why almost every approach fails.

[TurboGenius]

Did someone mention my name ?
Grins.
The farthest back 4 number system is a great one - it's not 100% (at all).
It is a good money maker though and is backed up with math (which I could explain but....
shrugs.. it won't change the mind of people who think AP is the only answer and that this is all
'fallacy' - and it won't change the minds of people that play it and typically win.)

What it comes down to - math wise, is the odds of a 'rare' (in this case 1-9 and not too rare) event
repeating itself. (which it does - about 1 in 9 times).
You can benefit from the fact that the math says the longest back cross-section on the table
will most likely not repeat itself back to back - therefore you can win.
Look at it this way... record spins as they happen -
Find the one number that doesn't show up (the longest sleeper) and then once it shows -
start all over again until you have 1 number again that hasn't shown. Is it the same number (no...
because that rare event won't repeat itself). The same goes for the cross-section of dozen/column - although it doesn't take as many spins to achieve the results.
I'd prefer to play this with some qualifications - like 4 spins being the minimum limit
(a dozen and a column are the 'farthest back' and neither have shown for 4 spins).
This makes the event more rare, and far less likely to repeat itself.

But anyway, I typically post at the new forum now - a bot grabbed this post and posted it there,
but I thought I would stop in and reply here.
Cheers and keep winning.
Turbo

[RouletteGhost]

thanks for responding

FYI I whipped out American zumma as I have many airball machines of American roulette here in NY and up to spin 40, mucho profit

thanks

it wont always win but for a quick hit and run few units its good...I wouldn't static bet it over and over

[coxx16]

Wow! I've been away for a long time and never thought I would see Turbo post again. I can't vouch for the system long term, but for the few times that I tried roulette at a casino, the furthest back system was the one I used. I won 60-100 bucks each time. I'm into computer programming now, I might code a simulator that uses the furthest back of varying lengths; just to see what happens. For instance, it would track 6 patterns: 4 spins, 8, spins, 16 spins and 32 spins; all at once.

[RouletteGhost]

Wow! I've been away for a long time and never thought I would see Turbo post again. I can't vouch for the system long term, but for the few times that I tried roulette at a casino, the furthest back system was the one I used. I won 60-100 bucks each time. I'm into computer programming now, I might code a simulator that uses the furthest back of varying lengths; just to see what happens. For instance, it would track 6 patterns: 4 spins, 8, spins, 16 spins and 32 spins; all at once.

Lol. Ive gotten turbo and kimo to post again

Lots oF lurkers here

I saw this 4 number method lose 20 times in a row. But before that 3 wins. So its good for hit and run i think

[ozon]

Unfortunately, this method is longterm loser, played in Dublin Bet and B & M casino, several winning sessions and large lost session, and so on.

[stuggie]

Did someone mention my name ?
Grins.
The farthest back 4 number system is a great one - it's not 100% (at all).
It is a good money maker though and is backed up with math (which I could explain but....
shrugs.. it won't change the mind of people who think AP is the only answer and that this is all
'fallacy' - and it won't change the minds of people that play it and typically win.)

What it comes down to - math wise, is the odds of a 'rare' (in this case 1-9 and not too rare) event
repeating itself. (which it does - about 1 in 9 times).
You can benefit from the fact that the math says the longest back cross-section on the table
will most likely not repeat itself back to back - therefore you can win.
Look at it this way... record spins as they happen -
Find the one number that doesn't show up (the longest sleeper) and then once it shows -
start all over again until you have 1 number again that hasn't shown. Is it the same number (no...
because that rare event won't repeat itself). The same goes for the cross-section of dozen/column - although it doesn't take as many spins to achieve the results.
I'd prefer to play this with some qualifications - like 4 spins being the minimum limit
(a dozen and a column are the 'farthest back' and neither have shown for 4 spins).
This makes the event more rare, and far less likely to repeat itself.

But anyway, I typically post at the new forum now - a bot grabbed this post and posted it there,
but I thought I would stop in and reply here.
Cheers and keep winning.
Turbo

I cant fault the logic ðŸ'

[RouletteGhost]

I think the method works fantastic

Everytime i test it, it works. The beauty? Only 4 numbers

Farthest back dozen and farthest back column bet those 4 numbers

[RouletteGhost]

Coxx did u code it?