• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Grassroots-1,2,3 A dozens idea

Started by onetaste, Nov 02, 10:29 AM 2015

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 25 Guests are viewing this topic.

denzie

As spins roll off our predictions get better

RouletteGhost

Quote from: denzie on Nov 13, 07:03 PM 2015
And his system is.....

he sells it with a bot

but he posted a video playing my quads until his kicked in
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

when it comes to sellers azim is the only one i trust besides normy who makes bots
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Azim

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Nov 13, 07:06 PM 2015
when it comes to sellers azim is the only one i trust besides normy who makes bots

Thanks RG.

With right tools and good money management, any gambling activity can produce a steady income.

RouletteGhost

Today i began my journey

I won $70 today betting against 1 2 3

I used $10 units

Progression was 10, 20, 60 per spot. Progression was to cut losses but not too extreme. The progression breaks even in step 2 and 3

Id win 10 then switch airball machines

Was very easy

The casino had a few airball machines disassembled and they were replaced with another brand

I played euro and american

In my time there i saw 1 2 3 once but it was before i arrived about 10 spins back
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

GLC

RG,  I've been looking at this bet within a matrix.  I set up a 3 wide matrix and bet that the middle vertical won't form 1 - 2 - 3.  That means we only get a bet every 3rd spin, but what's the hurry.

So, if our 1st spin is the 3rd dozen we bet on the 2nd and 3rd dozen against a 1st dozen spin for the middle position.  Let's say we get a 1st dozen hit, our matrix will look like this

3 1

If our next 2 spins are the 2nd doz and the 3rd doz, our matrix looks like this

3 1 2
3

We now bet 3-3 against the 2nd doz showing.  Let's say we get the 1st doz, our matrix is

3 1 2
3 1

That's a win.  If our next 2 dozens are 3 and 3 our matrix ix

3 1 2
3 1 3
3

Now we bet 1-1 against a 1st doz.  That's a little confusing because it looks like we should be betting against a 2nd doz, but remember that the 1st doz hit above was a win because we were betting against a 2nd dozen.

We just keep betting against this:

3 1 1
2 2 3
1 3 1

As you can see, the middle column creates 1 2 3 which is a loss.

Of course we could bet against any columns or even the diagonals.  A 3 wide matrix isn't special.  We could use a 4 5 6 or 7 or even more if we want more time between bets.

Just an idea that might or might not improve the system.

GLC
Ou
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

RouletteGhost

Good idea glc we can test it as a matrix
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

I only saw 1 2 3 once yesterday between multiple airball machines. Keep in mind arriving one spin before or after and u miss that. So the chances are so low!

solid performer

I owe one tase drinks in AC with my winnings
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

GLC

I make these observations just to qualify my previous post.  There's no reason why betting against 1 - 2 - 3 forming is better than betting against 2 - 2 - 2 or 2- 1 - 3 or any other arrangement of dozens.  They're all the same odds.

If you wait until you have a series of say 3 wins in a row of any dozen, then bet against 1-2-3, you might have a better hit rate.  It also means fewer betting opportunities. 

Of course, everything we're suggesting is "gambler's fallacy" but what else is there?

As a thought on the progression, if you lose a 1-1  3-3  9-9 progression, we could go to a 3-3  9-9  27-27  for 7 or 8 wins and then drop back to 1-1  3-3  9-9 to recover the remaining units.  If you lose within the 8 wins at 3-3 9-9 27-27 then you can move to a final progression of 9-9 27-27 81-81 for 8 times and then drop back down.  More risky, but a loss on  the 3rd set of bets should be pretty rare.
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

Chrisbis

Roulette..........................
Physical in Nature, Random in Opportunity                                                    The Reveal Originator!

RouletteGhost

George in the matrix you recommend playing one column only?

So in other words

Bet dozens 2 and 3
3 spins plater bet dozens 1 and 3
3 spins later bet dozens 1 and 2
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

GLC

RG,  No.  There's only 2 skips between bets.  So we're betting against 1-2-3 from top to bottom in the center column of the matrix.  The following is an example of a loss.

2 1 3
3 3 2
1 1 2
3 2 2
1 3 2
2 2 1

GLC
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

RouletteGhost

Quote from: GLC on Nov 16, 11:57 AM 2015
RG,  No.  There's only 2 skips between bets.  So we're betting against 1-2-3 from top to bottom in the center column of the matrix.  The following is an example of a loss.

2 1 3
3 3 2
1 1 2
3 2 2
1 3 2
2 2 1

GLC

Ok i understand

I went through some graphs and saw that formation once

Definitely a new way to test it

My hopes are high as i won on the airball machines

I hit top bet in progression twice which scared me though
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

GLC

We could use multiple patterns.

X X X
X X X
X X X

X X X
X X X
X X X

X X X
X X X
X X X

X X X
X X X
X X X

X X X
X X X
X X X

X X X
X X X
X X X

X X X
X X X
X X X

It's harder to track, but will get a lot more betting opportunities.

We could also wait until one of the locations shows a virtual loss and then bet against that same pattern forming a second time right after the first time.

GLC

Edit, I guess the bottom two are redundant.
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

GLC

I don't mean to get crazy here but we could also treat each dozen with a separate progression.  So the 1 doz has a bet line.  The 2 doz has a separate bet line.  And the 3 doz has a separate bet line.  This helps keep the bet sizes down.

You can use a penthouse progression for each dozen and any time you reach a new profit reset all lines.

I know it's more complicated and will require pen and paper so maybe not worth the trouble.

GLC
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

-