• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Progression bets are nothing more than different size bets on different spins. You could get lucky and win big, or unlucky and lose even more.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Grassroots-1,2,3 A dozens idea

Started by onetaste, Nov 02, 10:29 AM 2015

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 53 Guests are viewing this topic.

RouletteGhost

Quote from: Tacwell on Dec 03, 07:15 AM 2015
Well that's why i attached the test result files, go through them and see where it's possible going wrong. betting against the 3rd dozen coming up 2000 times and losing 700 times is perfectly in line with the realm of probability, so very probable not impossible.

And this is just testing, not negative testing. If the results are not what you expect to see it doesn't make it negative testing.

What you claim to have is impossible

123 will not happen every 9 mini games on 3 different 20000 spin tests

U said the exact quote another member did who had under 50 posts and left.....
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Tacwell

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Dec 03, 07:17 AM 2015
What you claim to have is impossible

123 will not happen every 9 mini games on 3 different 20000 spin tests

It's not impossible at all, we're betting on the 3rd dozen not to show, what are the odds of that? 2/3, which means 1/3 chance of losing, regardless of whether the preceding spins show dozens 1 or 2 or not. And what is 2000 / 709? 2.8 - expected average would be 3, so pretty close to the expected result I'd say.

RouletteGhost

Quote from: Tacwell on Dec 03, 07:32 AM 2015
It's not impossible at all, we're betting on the 3rd dozen not to show, what are the odds of that? 2/3, which means 1/3 chance of losing, regardless of whether the preceding spins show dozens 1 or 2 or not. And what is 2000 / 709? 2.8 - expected average would be 3, so pretty close to the expected result I'd say.

Of about 5 people testing heavily on euro. You are the only one with such claims

I am skeptical. And i am skeptical in my own right. You are new. Dont take it personal its the internet.

But i dont believe your results
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

Quote from: celescliff on Dec 02, 10:31 PM 2015
I tried the system at Celtic with fun money and I'm impressed about this just to see how far I can go without a loss. This is great.

Unfortunatly, I got a full loss after 66 spins, playing against previous 3 spins with insurance on zero, european wheel.

Before I lost I won on the first spin everytime (!) exept one. A dealer change changed the whole outcome.

It's funny how a dealer change can change a winning streak like this.

I attached the file so you can look at it if you want.

Just wanted to share my short experiment with this. Congrats on a great system.

This evening im goong to look heavier into this

Your results are very close to what i saw

Id like to test the against last 3 principle on columns as well

Celescliff looking forward to more tests from u :)
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Tacwell

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Dec 03, 07:33 AM 2015
Of about 5 people testing heavily on euro. You are the only one with such claims

I am skeptical. And i am skeptical in my own right. You are new. Dont take it personal its the internet.

But i dont believe your results

That's ok RG, I also don't believe everything I read on the internet. If you or anyone else is making money with the system then continue using it, but if at some point the winnings stop and you start taking losses, revert back to testing, maybe take a look at my results and make some tweaks to improve the system, instead of blindly believing in it and losing all your previous winnings and your bank roll.

I've been where you are now, believing I'd found a grail of some sort, more than once, with forex trading and sports betting, and the only thing that saved me from losing a fortune was being able to run simulated tests.

RouletteGhost

Below i have some pointers from a long term member who chooses to post sparingly but sends me pointers. Shared with permission. He is nice enough to share his successes with me

QuoteRG - just to clarify my plays. I only play for 1 win on 1 2 3 (& with my tests all the D's hit @ L1) so on any Dozen win I RUN to another table & play the same way with the Columns A B C, win on that & RUN again & play the 1 2 3 then the C's then the D's & so on.

Always resetting back to the start & therefore all the L1 bets are bet on the 2nd & 3rd positions. Lose go to L2 & bets as you know better than I are the 1st & 3rd, lose again & the bets are on the 1st & 2nd positions no matter if it's D's or C's.

In my test earlier today 9 bets won at L1 & only 1 needed & won at L2. Almost perfect.

This is something to consider. Play against 123 then next table play against ABC
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

celescliff

Not a bad idea. Just made a really short and quick test during coffee break at work. I didn't change the table though.  Notice what happens after
a short dealer change again. I would have lost if I was betting on the dozens. Dealer change is a nightmare but
5 wins out of 5. :)

I will test more with this when I get home from work.


RouletteGhost

Very cool

We have to see if this trend continues with columns

Going to test betting against ABC column sequence and bet against previous 3 columns

In your example betting against 123 and ABC won
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

Curious to see how long we can go before the previous 3 columns repeat
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

nottophammer

Quote from: nottophammer on Nov 20, 10:50 AM 2015
Hi RG
after a look at the dozen distribution around the 00 wheel you can see 1,2,3 is scattered around the layout,the single 0 layout has 2,1,3 scattered around.
So perhaps the euro we should play 2,1,3

After some plays using 2,1,3 it became clear not the combo to play. The last 4 days been using 1,3,2 much better, ( but you could use a combo of your choice really)
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

RouletteGhost

Quote from: nottophammer on Dec 03, 12:01 PM 2015
After some plays using 2,1,3 it became clear not the combo to play. The last 4 days been using 1,3,2 much better, ( but you could use a combo of your choice really)

Notto u have been testing this for awhile

In any instance did u have any indication that 123 will show once every 9 mini games? And if so do you think it could happen in 3 different 20,000 spin sets? Because ive been testing this since day one and the most ive seen 123 is once every 50 on euro

Thanks

Also check out betting against previous 3. Results VERY promising
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Orochi

Any combo have the same ODDS
I will post results soon
Nikola Tesla was once quoted as saying: “If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.”

RouletteGhost

Quote from: Orochi on Dec 03, 12:07 PM 2015
Any combo have the same ODDS
I will post results soon

Orochi what results will you be posting?
Instances of 123 sequenecs? Or against previous 3? Dozens or columns? Lol
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Orochi

1 2 3
1 3 2
2 1 3
3 1 2
3 2 1

1 2 3 1 2 3
1 3 2 1 3 2
2 1 3 2 1 3
3 1 2 3 1 2
3 2 1 3 2 1

2 Millions spins soo far
Nikola Tesla was once quoted as saying: “If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.”

nottophammer

Its something the law said and ray.
Been using 1,3,2 for the mini game, but wait for part of the combo to lose. Not gone beyond 4, 1,3,9,27 over the last 4 days,also not seen 1,3,2/1,3,2
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

-