Grassroots-1,2,3 A dozens idea

[GLC]

RG,

We don't mean to discourage you, just trying to caution you from making the same mistake our friend Le_Chiffre did.  He got carried away and lost most of his hard earned money.  Money he couldn't afford to lose.  It saddened me unbelievably.  That's why I'm always urging members to be cautious with their systems.  If you think out posts are just negative silliness, then please take them with a grain of salt.  Some of us have been frustrated by systems gone bad so many times, that we no longer have your enthusiasm.

We all wish you the best of luck on this system.

GLC

[RouletteGhost]

Look at our charts

If you dont believe in it just look at the charts

[ego]

 
GLC you make a very important and good Point.

Cheers

[nottophammer]

Wiesbaden : Table #4 07.02.2015

First 10 spins :

2-9-19       against 123     Win

13-7-33     against 213     Loss why not rebet 213 whats the count for back to back

33-11-19   against 312     Loss

.............this is what I was afraid of.........

[Drazen]

We all wish you the best of luck on this system.

Dear George you couldnt said it better.

There is no luck in this game I am afraid. This dream here for some will only become mathematical certainty.

[nottophammer]

Dear George you couldnt said it better.

There is no luck in this game I am afraid. This dream here for some will only become mathematical certainty.

This dream here for some will only become mathematical certainty.

Note the word some
Math is always there but not necessarily going to bite you on your arse.
To get to the moon, math, the suspension bridge,math.
So when you math boys going to produce the fomula to beat roulette.

[Tacwell]

So when you math boys going to produce the fomula to beat roulette.

That's pretty tough considering Einstein declared it impossible.

[nottophammer]

yes and Hawking would as well.
But if you are lucky, (math probaly work that out as well)the sledge hammer Law talks of, you might never meet. I have a friend who is so lucky, and i mean lucky, he probaly never meet the sledge hammer from hell.

[Drazen]

 

So when you math boys going to produce the fomula to beat roulette.

You already have it in GUT. Shouldnt that be enough?

[Tacwell]

 

yes and Hawking would as well.
But if you are lucky, (math probaly work that out as well)the sledge hammer Law talks of, you might never meet. I have a friend who is so lucky, and i mean lucky, he probaly never meet the sledge hammer from hell.

Yeah just stay within positive deviation and you'll be fine. That sledge hammer is waiting for you just south of negative standard deviation.

[nottophammer]

You already have it in GUT. Shouldnt that be enough?

yes play that thanks to Winkel. but its nice to  see people still trying to find a bet, (KISS)

[RouletteGhost]

Look at the attached chart

I have seen this not once. Not twice. But over 20 times

If im expected to believe this is no good i am not that naive

Im not abandoning something because a few people say it will fail long term

I have about 20 charts like this

Id be a fool to give up on it

Much money to be made

Ill leave the thread with that

20 charts of not one single loss

Ill take my chances

[Tacwell]

Look at the attached chart

I have seen this not once. Not twice. But over 20 times

If im expected to believe this is no good i am not that naive

Im not abandoning something because a few people say it will fail long term

I have about 20 charts like this

Id be a fool to give up on it

Much money to be made

Ill leave the thread with that

20 charts of not one single loss

Ill take my chances

Interestingly if you were still playing against 123 you would have lost twice on that chart.
Good luck RG, no one said you mustn't play your system, potential hazards were simply pointed out, with that information anyone reading the thread can make an informed decision as to whether they want to use this system or not.
Keep your discipline, stop when you lose, keep emotions at bay, and you should be ok.

[RouletteGhost]

Interestingly if you were still playing against 123 you would have lost twice on that chart.
Good luck RG, no one said you mustn't play your system, potential hazards were simply pointed out, with that information anyone reading the thread can make an informed decision as to whether they want to use this system or not.
Keep your discipline, stop when you lose, keep emotions at bay, and you should be ok.

Any and all methods will have hazards

The chart had one 123 mini game sequence. Which as ive been saying is expected. 1 in 100 for 00 wheels

123 does not effect me because id use small units then up my units on the next mini game to recoup

To make a method successful we have to stay sharp.

If you know of a better hit rate bet selection im all ears

With a hit rate like this we can overcome the occassional loss..i know about 5 people who are winning big and are choosing not to post

If i was playing 123 and hit one 123 sequence in 100 spins and couldnt overcome or make it work then id quit roulette

[Tacwell]

If you know of a better hit rate bet selection im all ears

With a hit rate like this we can overcome the occassional loss..i know about 5 people who are winning big and are choosing not to post

If i was playing 123 and hit one 123 sequence in 100 spins and couldnt overcome or make it work then id quit roulette

IF the average hit rate was one in a hundred we could all be rich. You only think it's 1/100 because to refuse to acknowledge long term tests which show the mean, your short term tests are above the mean and will eventually average out. To believe otherwise is to believe in magic, which I don't.
Your bet selection is no better than continuously betting any 2 dozens, so you may as well bet on dozen 1 and 2 every spin, it will eventually end up the same. To believe otherwise is also believing in magic.  It's not difficult to work it out.

So play your system, but don't tell everyone else that they must ignore negative test results and that a sequence will hit one out of a hundred times.