Grassroots-1,2,3 A dozens idea

[RouletteGhost]

IF the average hit rate was one in a hundred we could all be rich. You only think it's 1/100 because to refuse to acknowledge long term tests which show the mean, your short term tests are above the mean and will eventually average out. To believe otherwise is to believe in magic, which I don't.
Your bet selection is no better than continuously betting any 2 dozens, so you may as well bet on dozen 1 and 2 every spin, it will eventually end up the same. To believe otherwise is also believing in magic.  It's not difficult to work it out.

So play your system, but don't tell everyone else that they must ignore negative test results and that a sequence will hit one out of a hundred times.

I didnt say ignore test results

I said the thread is passing 40 pages

Historically when that happens people with under 50 posts come and post negative results

So what i suggested is that people test on their own and go based on their own results

Looking at the test results of those in this thread by the people that have posted, this is NOT the same as betting any 2 dozens

Money talks and bullshit walks. Lots of people talkin. And you are doin a lot of walkin.

[RouletteGhost]

3 people i know of playing against 123 and winning

they say the name of the game is short sessions

my advice to those playing against 123 sequence

use small unit size. say $1
on a mini game loss up the unit size to $10 and recoup the units in the next 2 mini games

we have guys here playing online with 10p...so it wont break the bank....if someone is playing with 10p, they can surely play a 139, then on the occasional loss X10 the chip size for 6 spins

seeing 123 and then 123 back to back is such an extreme rarity i dont think we have seen it yet in live play but on thousand spin simulations we have seen it sporadically. so somewhat safe to recoup immediately after.

this is roulette, have to take chances

i think the new way of thinking is a major step in the right direction

if those messaging me can come in this thread and speak id be grateful

also the law had many successful positive tests.....why he let one session of -38 get him down is beyond me....he had 6 positive sessions prior
besides we arent sitting for 300 spins....so its a moot point...we will never see the 5 losses

[nottophammer]

I didnt say ignore test results

I said the thread is passing 40 pages

Historically when that happens people with under 50 posts come and post negative results

So what i suggested is that people test on their own and go based on their own results

Looking at the test results of those in this thread by the people that have posted, this is NOT the same as betting any 2 dozens

Money talks and bullshit walks. Lots of people talkin. And you are doin a lot of walkin.

Love this reply RG.
Now I've not long got back from Bookies using rng now my aim was to play the 8 machines, 4 in each shop,H+R, to win a pound. Why a pound, 1-1,3-3,9-9, 27-27, can not bet anymore as be betting more than the max £100.00
Now i was being clever keeping track from the last 11 spins on the screen in my head should have took the old clip board, but the target of a pound from each machine was reached. As said to Ken behind the counter should have used £5 units, but as said must use a pound only, unless go to B+M.

[RouletteGhost]

Love this reply RG.
Now I've not long got back from Bookies using rng now my aim was to play the 8 machines, 4 in each shop,H+R, to win a pound. Why a pound, 1-1,3-3,9-9, 27-27, can not bet anymore as be betting more than the max £100.00
Now i was being clever keeping track from the last 11 spins on the screen in my head should have took the old clip board, but the target of a pound from each machine was reached. As said to Ken behind the counter should have used £5 units, but as said must use a pound only, unless go to B+M.

thanks nottophammer....the machines are rng machine or airball? if rng please be careful.....

whats happening with the thread now should not upset me. it is expected after 40 pages

[nottophammer]

So test on rng success.
Went back to Corals played the same way but continued betting when the trig came, even staying at the same machine betting against 1,3,2 the 46 spins made £3.60 in 20 mins plus 2 zeros where no insurance, so a good method

[RouletteGhost]

So test on rng success.
Went back to Corals played the same way but continued betting when the trig came, even staying at the same machine betting against 1,3,2 the 46 spins made £3.60 in 20 mins plus 2 zeros where no insurance, so a good method

id agree with that statement, a good method

notto....im glad you found a 123 variation that is working better on euro

since you are on it now, maybe try a few mini games against previous 3, and try a few mini games using these same principles but on columns....if you wish....might work well as it is for me

someone is playing the 123 dozen, on a win switches machines then does ABC column

[nottophammer]

just rng

whilst waiting to get on a machine that had not played was watching Jamie lose his money, even watching his spins using 1,3,2 could have won on his spins,dont think he liked the comments,like i'd be betting 1,2 this spin or 1,3

[RouletteGhost]

just rng

whilst waiting to get on a machine that had not played was watching Jamie lose his money, even watching his spins using 1,3,2 could have won on his spins,dont think he liked the comments,like i'd be betting 1,2 this spin or 1,3

when i was in ireland, i was in CORK

there were tiny little casinos with a few machines...is that bookies?

the reason i say be careful with RNG is that even if it IS random and fair it still wont behave like a real roulette wheel so betting patterns like 132 may not work

[ddarko]

use small unit size. say $1
on a mini game loss up the unit size to $10 and recoup the units in the next 2 mini games

is $1 the minimum for dozens at the B&M casino you play at RG ?

saying bet 10 times you initial stake sounds better to recoup as I'm fairly sure most ppl's minimum
at a B&M casino for outside bets would $5/£5/â,¬5 

[RouletteGhost]

is $1 the minimum for dozens at the B&M casino you play at RG ?

saying bet 10 times you initial stake sounds better to recoup as I'm fairly sure most ppl's minimum
at a B&M casino for outside bets would $5/£5/â,¬5 

was directed to those paying 10p online...........which many many do

[nottophammer]

RG
Bookmakers are shops where you can bet on Football,Horses,greyhounds and play egm's, which have reels like rainbow richies,poker and of course various Roulette games.

[RouletteGhost]

i havent been testing euro

but here is a quick test

1st chart is against previous 3 pattern repeating
2nd chart is betting against 132 as you suggest nottophammer

both positive.

the same as betting any 2 dozen? i think not

i will add this to my positive charts

at this point they are piling up

note: 25 mini games. 75 spins. STILL a LOT....we wont be there that long....no million spin nonsense. a smooth session. no loss.

one thing to point out, against previous 3 is so stable, STILL...rarely gets to third column. what separates it from other failed attempts is its not on a rolling basis, its mini games. i have has one mini game loss on betting against previous 3 in about 1000 spins now. if you see all my charts most previous 3 wins are column 1 and 2....very stable

tacwell tells me not to tell members 1 in 100....why? thats what im seeing....reporting what im seeing....testing....no reason to deceive anyone, im not selling anything

notto your 132 is proving itself....123 shows more on euro, 132 does not

[thelaw]

i havent been testing euro

but here is a quick test

1st chart is against previous 3 pattern repeating
2nd chart is betting against 132 as you suggest nottophammer

both positive.

the same as betting any 2 dozen? i think not

i will add this to my positive charts

at this point they are piling up

note: 25 mini games. 75 spins. STILL a LOT....we wont be there that long....no million spin nonsense. a smooth session. no loss.

one thing to point out, against previous 3 is so stable, STILL...rarely gets to third column. what separates it from other failed attempts is its not on a rolling basis, its mini games. i have has one mini game loss on betting against previous 3 in about 1000 spins now. if you see all my charts most previous 3 wins are column 1 and 2....very stable

tacwell tells me not to tell members 1 in 100....why? thats what im seeing....reporting what im seeing....testing....no reason to deceive anyone, im not selling anything

notto your 132 is proving itself....123 shows more on euro, 132 does not

If those charts are the norm, then you could just bet the first column(on your chart-not roulette table) using a Labouchere.

The labouchere only needs a 2-to-1 win ratio to stay profitable.

[INTERCEPTOR]

What about snake eyes 0 0 on bad run? or triple snake 0 0 0 ?

[RouletteGhost]

What about snake eyes 0 0 on bad run? or triple snake 0 0 0 ?

always insurance on 0

just enough to cover a loss