Grassroots-1,2,3 A dozens idea

[SimonZed1]

My sarcasm detector just peaked

No, really mean it... 

[RouletteGhost]

Yeah. I'm ready for it. Is there a way to start a private thread? I have a website and a blog, I could install a Simple Machines board or a wiki on it if people that produce results are interested in collaboration. 

Too bad we may have to do that but I am a little bit tired of trying to find the good posts thru the other not-interesting posts.

Just let me know.

Im proud to be the one who has had this happen for a second time. Lol

A good idea cannot be stopped

[mogul397]

I think I like you now that made me laugh out loud

How so?

[Drazen]

Out of frustration i spread $10 chips out. Hit. Win $360

What does this means? You placed your bets somewhere else randomly?

[Turner]

Out of frustration i spread $10 chips out. Hit. Win $360

I'm with Drazen. This shows you are out of control. It also shows that the system doesnt present a superior bet selection which is less than the house edge

Listen RG, take my advice or leave it.

You are on nearly 3000 posts. I have seen this many times

You are desperate to try roulette as you think its beatable with some idea that has been around for 100 years (Grassroots-1,2,3 A dozens idea)

It takes more.

You think you can walk in the lions cage and you have a plan to not be his next meal.

Even lion handlers with 40 years experience still push the food through the bars with a big stick

I think you will fall badly and lose a lot of money if you carry on with your current attitude to roulette.

No offence intended. Just think.

[RouletteGhost]

Actually i won 10 units flawlessly using the original as author intended grassroots

Which was about double my win goal so i overstayed my welcome

I wanted more so i decided to change my betting

At that point i lost

Then i won it back and then i got back to 10 units profit using the original grassroots idea

I only brought 1/4th my roulette bankroll to the casino.

I had a good time

New airball machines with nice leather and touch pads

Thanks for the advice but grassroots is a good staking plan (and its variations)

[Turner]

fair enough. None of us listen I guess. All my knowledge is from experience. Mostly bad.

[Orochi]

Later i will post a concept betting selection for this, when i get back from work.

[RouletteGhost]

Later i will post a concept betting selection for this, when i get back from work.

Look forward to i will be back tonight

This time 5 unit win goal no MATTER WHAT

[Drazen]

All my knowledge is from experience. Mostly bad.

Guys can I kindly ask few replies on this. I think it is really interesting question for this thread.

I often wonder did people who are hating math guys for being negative on forums ever wondered if at least one of them EVER so bravely stepped out of his own comfort zone and try to play some method/system for real, despite all negative computer simulations of his, to see whether it can be significant difference in results when putting real money to the table?

I think it would be enough only one math guy with such experience to get a ground for shutting up all possible naysayers.

I never heard: hey I am a math guy but all math sucks here. Don't trust it and just go play for real.

So 2 possible bets:

1. Either not even one math guy did not neglected his simulations and went to play for real.

2. All his math theory really meets the practice sooner or later, no matter what he tried

Best

Drazen

[RouletteGhost]

Guys can I kindly ask few replies on this. I think it is really interesting question for this thread.

I often wonder did people who are hating math guys for being negative on forums ever wondered if at least one of them EVER so bravely stepped out of his own comfort zone and try to play some method/system for real, despite all negative computer simulations of his, to see whether it can be significant difference in results when putting real money to the table?

I think it would be enough only one math guy with such experience to get a ground for shutting up all possible naysayers.

I never heard: hey I am a math guy but all math sucks here. Don't trust it and just go play for real.

So 2 possible bets:

1. Either not even one math guy did not neglected his simulations and went to play for real.

2. All his math theory really meets the practice sooner or later, no matter what he tried

Best

Drazen

Cant get around the math of roulette. It is what it is

Thats why i believe betting against fixed patterns. It is hard for a random entitiy to spit out fixed patterns

See orochis post

For the wheel to do
123
123
123
Three times in a row is 1 in over 800.

Thats not bad odds for an unbeatable game

[mogul397]

What does this means? You placed your bets somewhere else randomly?

I think that's exactly what happened. He was falling apart, made
a "hail mary" bet, and got lucky. So he pulled himself out of
disaster.

I'll give RG credit though. Nice trip report.

[mogul397]

Actually i won 10 units flawlessly using the original as author intended grassroots

Which was about double my win goal so i overstayed my welcome

I wanted more so i decided to change my betting

At that point i lost

Then i won it back and then i got back to 10 units profit using the original grassroots idea

I only brought 1/4th my roulette bankroll to the casino.

I had a good time

New airball machines with nice leather and touch pads

Thanks for the advice but grassroots is a good staking plan (and its variations)

RG, I'm glad you won, and glad you gave a truthful trip report.
But he is right. At some point you have to not slip into "fun mode",
and treat it like a business. Not that having fun is bad.

I quit drinking 14 years ago.  A ways before that, when I went to the casino
I would not drink while there. I would get plastered later. (Not my best
memories). That is not an example of good discipline. But I WAS able
to compartmentalize my behavior.

[mogul397]

Guys can I kindly ask few replies on this. I think it is really interesting question for this thread.

I often wonder did people who are hating math guys for being negative on forums ever wondered if at least one of them EVER so bravely stepped out of his own comfort zone and try to play some method/system for real, despite all negative computer simulations of his, to see whether it can be significant difference in results when putting real money to the table?

I think it would be enough only one math guy with such experience to get a ground for shutting up all possible naysayers.

I never heard: hey I am a math guy but all math sucks here. Don't trust it and just go play for real.

So 2 possible bets:

1. Either not even one math guy did not neglected his simulations and went to play for real.

2. All his math theory really meets the practice sooner or later, no matter what he tried

Best

Drazen

I think that people who hate the math guys hate them because they are disruptive.
I look at gambling play like a wave pool. So you jump in for the ride one way or
the other. All the water stays in the pool. And that shorter term approach is
what people who believe you can win use.

[RouletteGhost]

I think that's exactly what happened. He was falling apart, made
a "hail mary" bet, and got lucky. So he pulled himself out of
disaster.

I'll give RG credit though. Nice trip report.

I deviated. Thats why

I played the original as in post #1

After winning 10 units i decided to change the bet. Then i lost

Placed a savior bet which worked.  Then continued with the original and got back my 10 units profit. See post 1 thats what i did

I had fun