Grassroots-1,2,3 A dozens idea

[mogul397]

You meam against previous 3?

With the correct money management it may be a winner

Yes, I think that was one of the middle tweaks for the moving target.
The idea being that now you have many chances.

[Proofreaders2000]

I just tried Raymanz' tweak. (bet against the last
three)-at Sun Palace wheel (Grande Vegas) real money.

Won four times in a row, then it tanked on the fifth attempt.

[RouletteGhost]

I just tried Raymanz' tweak. (bet against the last
three)-at Sun Palace wheel (Grande Vegas) real money.

Won four times in a row, then it tanked on the fifth attempt.

Thats not raymanz tweak

Bet against previous 3......when unique only is the proper way.

Number 1 issue here. Not testing properly.

[Proofreaders2000]

Bet against previous 3--RG

I did just that (three unique dozens)

It took about two hours to wait for all five
triggers.  I played the last two legs of the system.
------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm thinking it's a better 'one session' system/day.

Bet moderate to heavy for one session only, leave.

[RouletteGhost]

Bet against previous 3--RG

I did just that (three unique dozens)

It took about two hours to wait for all five
triggers.  I played the last two legs of the system.
------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm thinking it's a better 'one session' system/day.

Bet moderate to heavy for one session only, leave.

Agree

[mogul397]

Agree

That's rough. So you hit an identical repeat of the unique pattern?
What betting method?  Progression?

I have to say I can't get out of my head what RG said somewhere. Somehow
you can test something to DEATH and finally, when you're money is on the
table you get screwed. Like the table knows you showed up. It can feel that
way.

The reason I poked in was I had a thought. And I suppose this thought isn't worth much.
But maybe. I was thinking about watching the patterns (unique or something I haven't
thought of) from not the last one, but the one before, and using it. My logic (if
there can be any) would be that there are trends in the data, and doing that
MIGHT keep you out of the trend path. Don't know. Just an idea.

As far as the uniques, Not sure if you were waiting for a unique lock step with the
grid of 3's. I tend to look for them asynchronous. Just the unique pattern no matter
how it happens. But like I said, perhaps a different trigger from an earlier one.

[RouletteGhost]

as you can see all wins

a loss at 139 would hurt and would require increasing chip size for recovery

not for anyone with scared money of course

must find MM

[mogul397]

as you can see all wins

a loss at 139 would hurt and would require increasing chip size for recovery

not for anyone with scared money of course

must find MM

How do you make those charts.

[RouletteGhost]

Google.com

Google drive

Google sheets

[mogul397]

Google.com

Google drive

Google sheets

Zumma. Pg 78.  First try.

No uniques on the dozens.  Spin322 on columbs

C B A
0 B A

[RouletteGhost]

Yea

Always cover 0

I have said many times in this thread we can see:

123
103

0 is not part of any dozen

So for this method insurance on 0 is a must

[mogul397]

Yea

Always cover 0

I have said many times in this thread we can see:

123
103

0 is not part of any dozen

So for this method insurance on 0 is a must

It's not clear to me how much that helps. Or if it just makes
you feel better. I continued and hit another loss on the columbs
on pg 80.   B A C B A C.  So either way it was a bust.

While I was testing it, I was kind of watching play for MATCHING
dozens.

[MrJ]

I honestly feel....which dozens you play and when you play them, makes NO difference.

To be fair, it kind of makes me look inconsistent. I play certain numbers (2-4) for certain reasons.

Is my style of betting the SAME as dozens? Perhaps.

Ken

[onetaste]

We're almost there i think..

[mogul397]

I honestly feel....which dozens you play and when you play them, makes NO difference.

To be fair, it kind of makes me look inconsistent. I play certain numbers (2-4) for certain reasons.

Is my style of betting the SAME as dozens? Perhaps.

Ken

I made a long reply to this and it got lost.