Grassroots-1,2,3 A dozens idea

[RouletteGhost]

Fu*k the pissing match

Delete my account

[Turner]

Fu*k the pissing match

Delete my account

Calm down for Petes sake

You dont want your account deleted, you like posting here. You have just gone a bit wobbly recently.

We all do it.

Just stop "avin a go" and accept some wont like what you post. Many do like it.

Think about it....you are welcome here.

and yes, saying you were leaving and havnt done was sarcastic...sorry

[mogul397]

I'm waiting to get two of the same number of vertical front of the line (always the first number of the 3 in a row). When i have two of the same bet in the third row i bet against a range.
233
231
Now I play against 2 (play 1-3 dozen)
Ok?

That list of first result almost seems impossible.

[mogul397]

Just because they are mods that doesnt mean they should trash ideas like its their way or the highway.

Dont like an idea? Well its not the mods job to be condescending

Whats the difference with what you just said?

Im out of here

PM only from now on


HA!!!!!!

Doesnt look like it

[mogul397]

Whats the difference? What i said was factual

Online rng is a scam. I can tell you that by seeing bluemans actual "spins"

Dont you have someone else to "moderate"

The point was that you said you weren't coming back.

And you did. (come back)

Great to have you hear anyway.

[blueman]

That list of first result almost seems impossible.

I know my friend, I know. That's why I played martingale and finished in shock. 

[MoneyT101]

Last night was the "water in the ears", so only now I see - the real results even worse. Here is exactly like it was. I bet after two of the same starting number.
122
123
123
111
131
Here are but lightly roasted later I was burned!
233
231
231
213
211
312
223
232
223
212
223
I love that game!
P.S. I'm sorry for my English- google

I had a similar game playing RNG.  dozen 2 repeated in row 1 about 7 times

[RouletteGhost]

I had a similar game playing RNG.  dozen 2 repeated in row 1 about 7 times

On 2 separate occasions very very close together blueman has shown RNG sesions with extreme 1st column repeats

Writing the dozens left to right in threes means this : every 3 Spins dozen 2 will show

Can it happen? Sure. Does it? No

I can show you dozens of charts, i havent seen it on real wheel

It is a RNG thing. Im telling you right now rng can be true fair rng BUT will not act like a real wheel

Do not play on Bet voyager and expect real wheel results

MoneyT has seen it as well as you see above my post

I can see it happening on real wheel but not like this so quickly and then AGAIN

[Turner]

RG
Do you play real wheel or airball

[MoneyT101]

You guys want to know whats even more suspicious with my rng play.

The same dozens hit in the first column back to back about 7+ times...what made it weird was that each and every time it was the same line(numbers 13-18)

I was to busy playing against the pattern 123 so i was happy i was winning,  but i wish i had caught on to that pattern early on 

[RouletteGhost]

You guys want to know whats even more suspicious with my rng play.

The same dozens hit in the first column back to back about 7+ times...what made it weird was that each and every time it was the same line(numbers 13-18)

I was to busy playing against the pattern 123 so i was happy i was winning,  but i wish i had caught on to that pattern early on 

I only see these types on RNG

RG
Do you play real wheel or airball

i play airball and real wheel

all testing done on real wheel and zumma

what bothers me about rng is this:

if i write dozens left to right as they show in rows of 3 i never get

213
222
231
221
231

when i say i never get that i mean a whole column of straight 2s. thats an rng thing

for the same dozen to hit every 3 spins ONCE, ok i get it, coincidence. twice....hmmmm...three times! must be the rng

[blueman]

You guys want to know whats even more suspicious with my rng play.

The same dozens hit in the first column back to back about 7+ times...what made it weird was that each and every time it was the same line(numbers 13-18)

I was to busy playing against the pattern 123 so i was happy i was winning,  but i wish i had caught on to that pattern early on 

That reminds me -a month ago, BVNZ, 3 dozen out 9 times in a row and all 9 red. I've played in red.

[mogul397]

That reminds me -a month ago, BVNZ, 3 dozen out 9 times in a row and all 9 red. I've played in red.

I'm getting tired of hearing about the whole RNG thing.  You know, if you
think it's fixed (and giving repeats) then play for repeats. Probably should
have a system looking for that anyway.

I always thought it was funny when people talk about playing a martingale
on red/black and losing. I watched a wheel marquis once a very long time ago.
Two younger girls were doing it. Chased the "opposite" (red or black).
And I got to watch FREE!!!!!!!!! All the while hoping against hope for them.

Never did it, but one time or another saw it.

But the argument never changes that, maybe mid stream in the martingale
you can switch betting, and fool it.

Results are results.

[RouletteGhost]

i said i was leaving out of frustration

i found a lot of what happened was ME. arguing pointlessly.

i have come to terms with on the internet people will disagree. people will attack. people will pretend to be different posters under different aliases due to being psychos.

i wont leave, i will just post less. and if someone disagrees? oh well who cares. i wont feed into it anymore. its pointless. ill say what i need to say and move on. dont like my test or strategy? i will say COOL

grassroots is being played successfully and its spawns. people dont like grassroots or disagree with it, well thats fine, they play their own methods.

i had a falling out with Mr. J which was NOT all me. i asked about another board so i can read, and his response was "why you have a HG"....that wasnt called for and it was an annoying comment. he only believes in 2 to 4 number methods so he chimes in here (without reading it) to say it wont work, or why should it work. i responded. it was pointless for me to respond because thats what we call a LOSE LOSE situation. anything that isnt 4 numbers or less is a lose lose iwth him. i should have known better. turner and Mr j will never buy into a method like this, so instead of engage i should have ignored and just went on my merry way.

i think those 2 are good guys. ive spoken to them privately. no problem there. but professional moderator wise, they can do a better job, and i stand by that

[NextYear]

RG, how are things with snow?