• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Grassroots-1,2,3 A dozens idea

Started by onetaste, Nov 02, 10:29 AM 2015

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 26 Guests are viewing this topic.

RouletteGhost

Quote from: mogul397 on Jun 03, 03:06 PM 2016
Not to worry. I've got your back RG. I'm always here for you.

I'm blessed.
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

vladir

Has anyone coded this?
If yes, can someone test it with this betting (havent read the 118 pages, sorry if someone sugested anything like it already ) :

Bet levels:
level 0 - [1-3-9]
level 1 - [2-6-18]
level 2 - [3-9-27]
... (as much levels as bankroll allows)

Now, we start at lvl 0 and play until a loss.
On a loss, we go up a lvl.
We play at current lvl until one of the following happens :
a) - we are at a new high bankroll (the moment we are, we reset to lvl 0)
b) - we win 26 consecutive attacks at current lvl (drop back a lvl)
c) - we lose (in this case we go up a lvl)

If you try it, share your results. Thanks!


"In God we trust; all others must bring data", W. Edwards Deming

RouletteGhost

Quote from: vladir on Jun 03, 07:14 PM 2016
Has anyone coded this?
If yes, can someone test it with this betting (havent read the 118 pages, sorry if someone sugested anything like it already ) :

Bet levels:
level 0 - [1-3-9]
level 1 - [2-6-18]
level 2 - [3-9-27]
... (as much levels as bankroll allows)

Now, we start at lvl 0 and play until a loss.
On a loss, we go up a lvl.
We play at current lvl until one of the following happens :
a) - we are at a new high bankroll (the moment we are, we reset to lvl 0)
b) - we win 26 consecutive attacks at current lvl (drop back a lvl)
c) - we lose (in this case we go up a lvl)

If you try it, share your results. Thanks!

hey vladir

i had the exact same idea earlier in the thread

see attached post

1 3 9. on a loss increase unit size to recover fast....

things in this thread got derailed...

this was a normal for me

see the lack of 123 in the mini games?

i had a great time testing

always use money you can afford to lose
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

vladir

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Jun 03, 07:17 PM 2016
hey vladir

i had the exact same idea earlier in the thread

see attached post

1 3 9. on a loss increase unit size to recover fast....

things in this thread got derailed...

this was a normal for me

see the lack of 123 in the mini games?

i had a great time testing

always use money you can afford to lose

Nice, and for how much spins did you test that may I ask?

"In God we trust; all others must bring data", W. Edwards Deming

RouletteGhost

the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

mogul397

Quote from: vladir on Jun 03, 07:14 PM 2016
Has anyone coded this?
If yes, can someone test it with this betting (havent read the 118 pages, sorry if someone sugested anything like it already ) :

Bet levels:
level 0 - [1-3-9]
level 1 - [2-6-18]
level 2 - [3-9-27]
... (as much levels as bankroll allows)

Now, we start at lvl 0 and play until a loss.
On a loss, we go up a lvl.
We play at current lvl until one of the following happens :
a) - we are at a new high bankroll (the moment we are, we reset to lvl 0)
b) - we win 26 consecutive attacks at current lvl (drop back a lvl)
c) - we lose (in this case we go up a lvl)

If you try it, share your results. Thanks!

I still wonder if it isn't a good idea to only play 1,3 and absorb the smaller
loss of 8 units.
NOBODY knows what you THINK they know

atlantis

Hi mogul397,

Maybe this doz/col tracker software from VLS can help?

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=9951.0

A.
Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

RouletteGhost

Quote from: vladir on Jun 03, 07:14 PM 2016
Has anyone coded this?
If yes, can someone test it with this betting (havent read the 118 pages, sorry if someone sugested anything like it already ) :

Bet levels:
level 0 - [1-3-9]
level 1 - [2-6-18]
level 2 - [3-9-27]
... (as much levels as bankroll allows)

Now, we start at lvl 0 and play until a loss.
On a loss, we go up a lvl.
We play at current lvl until one of the following happens :
a) - we are at a new high bankroll (the moment we are, we reset to lvl 0)
b) - we win 26 consecutive attacks at current lvl (drop back a lvl)
c) - we lose (in this case we go up a lvl)

If you try it, share your results. Thanks!

Tried it

Worked well

After a 3 step loss i recovered quickly

Thx
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

mogul397

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Jun 04, 02:18 PM 2016
Tried it

Worked well

After a 3 step loss i recovered quickly

Thx

I took a page of RNG data from the link Simon left today and played on paper.
Just used each row of 3 for play till I won or lost.
It sucked.

After 4 wins I hit the 3rd bet twice in a row and then a loss.
NOBODY knows what you THINK they know

mogul397

And 1,2,3 came out the 2nd set of 3 in a row.
NOBODY knows what you THINK they know

RouletteGhost

Quote from: mogul397 on Jun 04, 07:25 PM 2016
I took a page of RNG data from the link Simon left today and played on paper.
Just used each row of 3 for play till I won or lost.
It sucked.

After 4 wins I hit the 3rd bet twice in a row and then a loss.

Luckily you have the freedom to leave this strategy and never look back.

You saw 123123123, better go play lotto cowboy.


I have posted thousands of sets from zumma in this very thread in excel charts, 123123123 i have never seen once, Pinocchio.

maybe I am wrong on the assumption, can you post the number set?
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

.
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

what amazes me is on ALL my zumma tests a loss on 123 using a 1 3 9 progression ALWAYS recovered without upping the unit size

amazed by that
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

bleep24

Mogul must be the unluckiest guy on the planet.  No matter what system it is he always manages to find losing streaks.  If it is on RNG then I can well believe it but I only play `live` as RNG experiences are the pits.  I would suggest to Mogul he try playing 1,2,3 dozens followed by 1,2,3 columns.  Also after a 1,2,3 loss stop playing for 5 or 6 spins.  I have only experienced a few 1.2.3 in my limited playing of this but it is so easy to play and there are that many variations (tweaks) that can be applied to suit all players and there should not be many losses overall.
Grassroots 1,2,3 should definitely be in every players tool-box.
I have not tried it but playing +1/-1 in theory should work owing to the high level of winning spins.
We could also play dozens/columns at same time having 2 separate banks. 

RouletteGhost

Quote from: bleep24 on Jun 05, 03:52 AM 2016
Mogul must be the unluckiest guy on the planet.  No matter what system it is he always manages to find losing streaks.  If it is on RNG then I can well believe it but I only play `live` as RNG experiences are the pits.  I would suggest to Mogul he try playing 1,2,3 dozens followed by 1,2,3 columns.  Also after a 1,2,3 loss stop playing for 5 or 6 spins.  I have only experienced a few 1.2.3 in my limited playing of this but it is so easy to play and there are that many variations (tweaks) that can be applied to suit all players and there should not be many losses overall.
Grassroots 1,2,3 should definitely be in every players tool-box.
I have not tried it but playing +1/-1 in theory should work owing to the high level of winning spins.
We could also play dozens/columns at same time having 2 separate banks.

Definitely

And he did test it on rng. Explains a lot
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

-