9 number method

[celescliff]

Very nice. 

[RouletteGhost]

hey normy, are you using the wheel tweak you posted a few posts back or the original?

Rich

[Normy2000]

I'm using both plus many other one, i change method every few wins... 

[nottophammer]

anyone know what one of the sectors could miss for

[RouletteGhost]

anyone know what one of the sectors could miss for

The scientific answer is: infinitely

[nottophammer]

well seen 9 on the carpet miss for 34 spins, so i suppose a sector of 9 on the wheel could miss the same

[nottophammer]

MVG is on, the darts, be back after

[maestro]

worst case is 60 spins

[BellagioOwner]

worst case is 60 spins

How you get that ?

[DoctorSudoku]

The scientific answer is: infinitely

Not infinitely, of course.

But the number of misses that a sector experiences will be unpredictable and all over the place.

It might have misses that run like this: 6, 4, 1, 2, 5, 1, 4, 2, 1, 6, 1, 2, etc.

It is difficult to base a system on that.

[RouletteGhost]

Not infinitely, of course.

But the number of misses that a sector experiences will be unpredictable and all over the place.

It might have misses that run like this: 6, 4, 1, 2, 5, 1, 4, 2, 1, 6, 1, 2, etc.

It is difficult to base a system on that.

Based on your example

A 6 step progression on 9 numbers is easy

[RouletteGhost]

My statement was overlooked

Each spin is independent and anything is possible

Therefore techinically, 9 number sector can miss forever

[RouletteGhost]

My point is actually good for roulette system players

What CAN happen will not happen

Roulette has limits.

A dozen can miss 100 times. But it wont. See?

[nottophammer]

Jimme b, just had the last bit of Oban 14 year old.
Now the reason asked, how long a sector could miss. If you give each sector its own flat bet or progression, could you make some units  before one of the four sectors went on Maestros 60 spins for a win.
Jackpot247 29.10.16 first 8 spins would it be enough to move to another table/wheel.

1      2      3      4       #
1      1      1      1       3
1      1      1      1       31
1      1      1      1       28
2      2      1      1       11
2      1      1      1       23
3      1      2      1       20
4      1      1      2       14
5      1      1      2       17   

Right let me see if i can word this right.
Give each sector its own progression like 1,1,2,2,3,4,5,10,10,15  could go on more,
would or could you ride out one sector going on a long run?
What would be your target  to stop, then wait or move to another wheel.

All this is going no where, so i'd end up going back to non-hits and watching the trot.

I'll be back after Motogp Uk start time 07.00 AM, looking back at what just wrote, you'd be betting each sector at the same time,

[DoctorSudoku]

Based on your example

A 6 step progression on 9 numbers is easy

And then when the sector goes missing for 7,8, 9, or more spins (which can happen), then your 6 step progression would set you back in a very big way.

That is the fundamental problem with negative progressions and that is why you will never make money consistently by using them.