grassroots matrix

[RouletteGhost]

I found an anomaly that has not lost

Been testing it for a few weeks. Didnt wanna post it cause i didnt wanna deal with BS. Lately posting ideas here is an uphill battle, but i digress. But i do have a fan club privately through PM so here is the method

-If you do not belive in 24 number bets read no further
-if you do not believe in matrixes read no further
-if you do not believe in waiting read no further


I was scanning my grassroots tests and developed this

Write the dozens as they show in rows of 3 as they come.....left to right

Example

311

Next 3 we have

232

Next 3 we have

113

So

311
232
113

Each column is its own game. We bet vertically......each column separate bankroll

Column 1 we bet 321 wont happen again
Column 2 we bet 131 wont happen again
Column 3 we bet 123 wont happen again

This is no where near a rollin basis. This is against 9 spins back

It works and i dont know why. Well i assume its because the wheel wont spit out an identical pattern every 9 spins, its random

Havent had a loss yet with 139. Im a risk taker i like 139, sue me

No long wait time

We can bet right away if we go by past 9 spins

Any negativity just shut up, dont want to hear it, just move on blissfully to another thread. This is the notepad im sharing an idea, period.

Actually i take that back. I welcome negativity. Requirements for negativity in this thread: 1) post a test 2) provide actual spins of that test. This way we have a basis for the negative remarks.

I will post tests ive done tomorrow

[keepontryin]

rg i have been looking at this way back around the 60th page of grass roots it does show promise but be careful using a progression it will BITE YOU

[Tomla021]

clever way of interpreting it ,i will check some spins

[SimonZed1]

I found an anomaly that has not lost

Been testing it for a few weeks. Didnt wanna post it cause i didnt wanna deal with BS. Lately posting ideas here is an uphill battle, but i digress. But i do have a fan club privately through PM so here is the method

Hi! I beleave it was a mistake posting it here if it works. Should have kept it for yourself. But, hey, thanks for sharing. I find it very interesting and will try it after I am finished testing my own tweak.

Simon.

[mogul397]

I found an anomaly that has not lost

Been testing it for a few weeks. Didnt wanna post it cause i didnt wanna deal with BS. Lately posting ideas here is an uphill battle, but i digress. But i do have a fan club privately through PM so here is the method

-If you do not belive in 24 number bets read no further
-if you do not believe in matrixes read no further
-if you do not believe in waiting read no further


I was scanning my grassroots tests and developed this

Write the dozens as they show in rows of 3 as they come.....left to right

Example

311

Next 3 we have

232

Next 3 we have

113

So

311
232
113

Each column is its own game. We bet vertically......each column separate bankroll

Column 1 we bet 321 wont happen again
Column 2 we bet 131 wont happen again
Column 3 we bet 123 wont happen again

This is no where near a rollin basis. This is against 9 spins back

It works and i dont know why. Well i assume its because the wheel wont spit out an identical pattern every 9 spins, its random

Havent had a loss yet with 139. Im a risk taker i like 139, sue me

No long wait time

We can bet right away if we go by past 9 spins

Any negativity just shut up, dont want to hear it, just move on blissfully to another thread. This is the notepad im sharing an idea, period.

Actually i take that back. I welcome negativity. Requirements for negativity in this thread: 1) post a test 2) provide actual spins of that test. This way we have a basis for the negative remarks.

I will post tests ive done tomorrow

I think that the magic, or the value in any of this line of thinking or technique has to do
with things running in trends. Like uniques, repeats, whatever you're trapping on.

So the concept of shuffling the deck, or using information that is back a bit in the
results, gets you out of, or in a transition from what trends were just happening.

I think that's the value of it.  We never seem to be able to identify what is actually happening
at the moment, so why not let the results work it out on their own.

Not sure that this is the perfect solution. But I feel stronger in the structure of what I
just said, the more I think about it.

[mogul397]

I found an anomaly that has not lost

Been testing it for a few weeks. Didnt wanna post it cause i didnt wanna deal with BS. Lately posting ideas here is an uphill battle, but i digress. But i do have a fan club privately through PM so here is the method

-If you do not belive in 24 number bets read no further
-if you do not believe in matrixes read no further
-if you do not believe in waiting read no further


I was scanning my grassroots tests and developed this

Write the dozens as they show in rows of 3 as they come.....left to right

Example

311

Next 3 we have

232

Next 3 we have

113

So

311
232
113

Each column is its own game. We bet vertically......each column separate bankroll

Column 1 we bet 321 wont happen again
Column 2 we bet 131 wont happen again
Column 3 we bet 123 wont happen again

This is no where near a rollin basis. This is against 9 spins back

It works and i dont know why. Well i assume its because the wheel wont spit out an identical pattern every 9 spins, its random

Havent had a loss yet with 139. Im a risk taker i like 139, sue me

No long wait time

We can bet right away if we go by past 9 spins

Any negativity just shut up, dont want to hear it, just move on blissfully to another thread. This is the notepad im sharing an idea, period.

Actually i take that back. I welcome negativity. Requirements for negativity in this thread: 1) post a test 2) provide actual spins of that test. This way we have a basis for the negative remarks.

I will post tests ive done tomorrow

I have one question.

Pg 231 in zumma (just for an example)

3  1 2
2 1 1
2 3 3

Next 3 play against 3 2 2.

2 3 0 is the next 3.  Do you only use the 1st row to play?
Since you have 2 3 0, do you take the 1st row and play against 2 2 2?

Thanks

[mogul397]

I found an anomaly that has not lost

Been testing it for a few weeks. Didnt wanna post it cause i didnt wanna deal with BS. Lately posting ideas here is an uphill battle, but i digress. But i do have a fan club privately through PM so here is the method

-If you do not belive in 24 number bets read no further
-if you do not believe in matrixes read no further
-if you do not believe in waiting read no further


I was scanning my grassroots tests and developed this

Write the dozens as they show in rows of 3 as they come.....left to right

Example

311

Next 3 we have

232

Next 3 we have

113

So

311
232
113

Each column is its own game. We bet vertically......each column separate bankroll

Column 1 we bet 321 wont happen again
Column 2 we bet 131 wont happen again
Column 3 we bet 123 wont happen again

This is no where near a rollin basis. This is against 9 spins back

It works and i dont know why. Well i assume its because the wheel wont spit out an identical pattern every 9 spins, its random

Havent had a loss yet with 139. Im a risk taker i like 139, sue me

No long wait time

We can bet right away if we go by past 9 spins

Any negativity just shut up, dont want to hear it, just move on blissfully to another thread. This is the notepad im sharing an idea, period.

Actually i take that back. I welcome negativity. Requirements for negativity in this thread: 1) post a test 2) provide actual spins of that test. This way we have a basis for the negative remarks.

I will post tests ive done tomorrow

Sorry. I get it.

[RouletteGhost]

write dozens as they show left to right in rows of 3, each columns is own game

columns A rows 1, 2, and 3. we have:
1
2
3

so in columns A we bet for 123 not to repeat

1
2
2
has occured, no repeat.....needs MM

[RouletteGhost]

essentially this is against 9 back

if playing with 1 3 9 progression stop that series on a win in that column

if flat betting: bet against the dozen 9 back and stop at +5 units. at +5 units switch tables or stop before the house edge catches up

[Celticknits]

Hi! I beleave it was a mistake posting it here if it works. Should have kept it for yourself. But, hey, thanks for sharing. I find it very interesting and will try it after I am finished testing my own tweak.

Simon.

Why are you here if you feel this way!!!

-Celtic