• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Previous Six DS

Started by celescliff, Feb 01, 04:38 PM 2016

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

celescliff

Don't know if this method have been posting before, so here goes.

Track 6 spins. DS that comes up:

2-3-6-1-4-4

Bet 1 unit that the same DS will come. If 0 comes, you bet the DS of your choise in the next round:

2-3-6-1-4-4 tracking
2-6-1-1-2-4 3 wins, bet along with previous 6.
5-5-1-1-1-4 3 wins
4-4-3-2-6-6 0 wins
4-1-2-2-0-4 2 wins, choose what DS you want to bet for 0.
1-1-2-1-5-3 2 wins (lost on the 5th ds, played the 4th)

Progression: Flat. On loss -1 unit on win +5 units.


celescliff

In other words. If DS 1 2 3 4 5 6 in the first 6 spins you bet 1 2 3 4 5 6 the next six. 99% of the time the six DS wont come up in that order but often 1-3.

celescliff

Test run. Stop loss 300 stop win 500+.


DS      Info
5-5-5-5-3-3: tracking
3-1-1-5-2-5: 1 win
2-2-2-2-1-6: 0 wins
6-2-5-5-4-3: 1 win
5-6-4-2-6-1: 0 wins
2-1-6-4-6-5: 1 win
6-3-2-4-3-6: 1 win
6-6-5-5-5-1: 1 win
5-5-3-3-4-1: 0 wins
5-1-6-4-2-5: 1 win
5-2-5-4-5-3: 2 wins
4-1-5-6-4-5: 1 win
3-1-6-2-2-5: 2 wins
5-4-2-1-2-2: 1 win
0-4-1-2-1-3: 1 win
1-1-6-2-4-3: 3 wins (bet 1 on zero)
3-5-6-2-6-4: 2 wins
4-1-6-1-6-6: 2 wins
6-5-6-6-6-4: 2 wins
3-5-1-3-5-4: 2 wins
6-2-4-4-5-1: 1 win
1-3-1-4-5-3: 1 win
1-4-3-4    : 2 wins

20151202-0205 10u +510

RouletteGhost

See what happens if you bet in groups of 5

Buf if you win sit out remaining spins

Example

2 - 1 - 6 - 4 - 2 - 2
3 - 2 - 6 - v - v - v

V means virtual. You won 3rd attemp. Sit out next 3
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

denzie

Impressive stuff  :thumbsup:
Let's give it a try
As spins roll off our predictions get better

tuddilue

Impressive! What size of unit is your starting point?

denzie

Duisburg 01/01/2016 table 5
135 spins = + 14 units.  FLAT

It recovers very fast .  :thumbsup:
Btw I've put them in a 5 wide matrix
As spins roll off our predictions get better

denzie

Same spins in 6 - wide matrix +4 Flat  :thumbsup:

I would probably suggest after we got -10 .... bet 2 units.

BR 30 u
Win goal 15 u.

Or wait a virtual -10 and  :love:
As spins roll off our predictions get better

denzie

Duisburg 02/01/2016 table 5 .... 110 spins

Matrix 5 .... -10 Flat
Matrix 6 .... +22 Flat
As spins roll off our predictions get better

nottophammer

Quote from: denzie on Feb 02, 03:05 AM 2016
Duisburg 01/01/2016 table 5
135 spins = + 14 units.  FLAT

It recovers very fast .  :thumbsup:
Btw I've put them in a 5 wide matrix
Quote from: denzie on Feb 02, 04:03 AM 2016
Duisburg 02/01/2016 table 5 .... 110 spins

Matrix 5 .... -10 Flat
Matrix 6 .... +22 Flat

so 5 wide won 14, then lost 10.
Was you betting every spin. Or sitting out after a win. Oh yes whilst waiting for the boy popped in corals on machine of death played against last doz using +1/-1 and parley +£ 4 in 12 spins
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

denzie

As spins roll off our predictions get better

celescliff

Thanks for the tests denzie. 😊

Quote from: tuddilue on Feb 02, 01:51 AM 2016
Impressive! What size of unit is your starting point?

Thanks. 😊 I played the test with 10 units.

Celticknits

Celtic Casino 02/Feb/2016
42 spins = + 19 units.  FLAT BET
6 Wide Matrix
V bets on 0

Seems almost too good to be true so far.
Only system I have tried which seems to favor flat betting.

Has anyone had a bad experience with this?

-Celtic
'Sometimes it is best to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt'

Kattila

Quote :

***  Has anyone had a bad experience with this? ***

I can say i do have experience with this kind of strategys.
If you look at one of my latest systems i posted, i play same
but more complete system, i mean this :

If you put the DSs in 6 matrix  you track Only
distance 6 between same DS. Why not track more distances at the same
time then take a decision ?(not easy of course ) If you track Matrix stile( wide 6,5, 4,3,2) then you have to track
more Matrix  s  at the same time, too complicated right ?
Then do the track in my stile :

DS/ distance


2
6
6   d1
2   d3
1
3   d6
5
3   d2
5   d2
1   d5
1   d1 and d6
4
3   d5
1   d3  and d4
5   d6  now i decide to attack d4, bet DS4
2         l1    bet DS3
5   d2  l2    bet  DS1
1   d4   win

When track we count the distance starting from the second last DS hit,
and when attack we count from the last DS hit.


You can attack a distance after long absence, or attack one *active/hot* distance,
both ways flat bet or with positive progression. Both ways can experience bad runs,
but many  times  the poss. progrs. will save you. Other progression is one advised by
Winkel (for one DS)  :  each Fibo x 5 times , stay on the progression until in plus.
( 11111/ 11111/ 22222/ 33333/ 55555/ 88888/ etc...). One need big bankroll, but
can start from 0,10.
I attack missing distances  but i use now different bet selection (s).

cheers

celescliff

Thanks Kattila. Preciate it.  :thumbsup:

I add some tests, nevermind the br stuff but to let you see wins and losses and also maybe to give some food for thought.


-