Triple Attack

[ignatus]

This one require that you have the RouletteXtreme software for tracking. This combines wheel-sectors and hotnumbers. Open the "Wheel Frequency"-chart. Now, divide the wheel into 4 parts. (like a cross).

TRIGGER- Wait until one of the 4 sectors of the wheel has got a minimum of 3 hits. (The newest 3 hits of one sector is always bet) Bet all numbers within that particular sector that has a minimum of 3 hits (from the last 10 spins). IF another number hit within the same sector that one is also bet. IF a new trigger appear, all bets are removed and the new trigger is bet. IF hit, STOP and wait for a new trigger. (that could be any sector that has a minimum of 3 new hits).

Progression -none- FLATBET

First two test was played with 5u bets

[NextYear]

Long live Flatbet!
And Ignatus.

[ignatus]

Long live Flatbet!
And Ignatus.

Thanks

[ignatus]

3rd game won.

Played with 5u bets, wingoal +1000u

[thelaw]

3rd game won.

Played with 5u bets, wingoal +1000u

Is this system designed to induce a heart-attack?

[ignatus]

Is this system designed to induce a heart-attack?

why? You're worried about the ups and downs? i think it has a pretty good hitrate (for being Flatbet!) and drawdowns are not so bad, it's a neutral/positive trend.

[ignatus]

4/4 Games won.

[thelaw]

why? You're worried about the ups and downs? i think it has a pretty good hitrate (for being Flatbet!) and drawdowns are not so bad, it's a neutral/positive trend.

I was just joking.............but going from 950 to 100 is a pretty big drop

[ignatus]

I was just joking.............but going from 950 to 100 is a pretty big drop

OK, yes maybe so, recovery seems to be good. But calculating with 1u bets that would be a 180u drop, (i played with 5u bets) I think drawdowns can be worse playing any other hotnumbers strategy.

[thelaw]

OK, yes maybe so, recovery seems to be good. But calculating with 1u bets that would be a 180u drop, (i played with 5u bets) I think drawdowns can be worse playing any other hotnumbers strategy.

Agreed.

Have you ever taken one of these tests further into dozens of sessions? 

It would be interesting to see if they hold up given the number of successful methods you presented.

As always, Thanks for the great work! 

[ignatus]

Agreed.

Have you ever taken one of these tests further into dozens of sessions? 

It would be interesting to see if they hold up given the number of successful methods you presented.

As always, Thanks for the great work! 

Thanks well, i test as much as i can, if there is further interest in this one, i'll do more test.

[ignatus]

5th game was a loss. But it reached +500u before loss. perhaps i should lower my wingoal... :S

[thelaw]

Thanks well, i test as much as i can, if there is further interest in this one, i'll do more test.

I've mentioned this on another thread before, but what about a Labouchere MM system with this bet selection?

It would look like this:

Bank : 5000 units (just to be safe)

Session W/L : WWLLW

First session : +500 units

Second : +500 units

Third : -500 units......now move into recoup phase....

Fourth : bet same 500 again to try to recoup : -500 loss again (-1000)

Fifth : betting line looks like this : 500, 500 so bet first and last in Labouchere line (1000)  Win = 1000......now back to even on betting line

......now we're still ahead 1000 units after 2/5 lost sessions.


Just my $.02