Blue Angel's HG (Fallacious)

[Blue_Angel]

Guys in case you have not found it yet, the troll with username "general" is Calleb Jonshon.

Personally I'd not bother with such ridiculous person.

Also I'd like to politely request from Steve to restraint the said user, at least from this topic, thank you.

[denzie]

@thegeneral

if you call 1,000,000 spins just luck as you just did then damnit where can i find that luck

LMFAO   

[The General]

Nobody has simulated the Martingale over 1 mill spins and produced a statistically relevant result.  Blue's system is no different.

[RouletteGhost]

Nobody has simulated the Martingale over 1 mill spins and produced a statistically relevant result.  Blue's system is no different.

martingale is martingale

it sucks

we know this

but i think he demonstrated a stretched martingale beating 1 million spins

[The General]

but i think he demonstrated a stretched martingale beating 1 million spins

No he didn't.

Watching a system and then betting intermittently over 1 million spins is not the same as having placed 1 million bets.  My guess is that he's only bet on a small portion of those when running his tests.

Actual placed bets are likely less than a few thousand, if even that many.

Steve is correct.  Blue's system is worthless.

[RouletteGhost]

im not the sharpest tool in the shed

but dude you gave yourself away

you obviously joined the forum to troll him

ignore list, check

redemption: make your first thread here a contribution

[Steve]

Blue angel,  you didn't answer my questions about the rx testing

[Tamino]

Wrong thread.

[The General]

I'm not here to troll Blue Angel aka Angelo Anttoni... a known system seller.

I merely saw someone peddling yet another Martingale system.  And I'm baffled as to why people still chase such snake oil.

Turbo and Mr. J. wrote a post that basically sums it all up.  link:://:.GF/threads/basics-that-no-one-wants-to-hear.3604/

[Tamino]

This soon will become  a system sellers paradise.

[Blue_Angel]

Blue angel,  you didn't answer my questions about the rx testing

Yes I did, it hasn't been RX coded yet as far as I know but it has been tested.

I've requested Les Howell of RX software to coded it but I didn't get any response so far.

[Steve]

it hasn't been RX coded yet as far as I know but it has been tested.

I thought it had been tested over 1M spins. EXACTLY what testing has been done?

It would take someone a very long time to manually test 1M spins. If you are talking about 10,000 or so spins, even random red/black bets can sometimes profit after 10,000 spins.

[Steve]

Also testing for that bad streak from hell is not so easy. To find that killer bad streak manually would be very tedious. You'd realistically need some kind of algorithm or software to do that kind of testing. Maybe that's why nobody has found it yet.

And sorry but we have to remove your signature. Commercial information like that isnt allowed in signatures. I dont think yours will help you sell anything anyway, because on amazon there is 1 review, its negative, and the system seems to be free in the ebook preview anyway. Yes I'm the exception with sigantures, because I pay for the hosting and running the forum.

[Blue_Angel]

Also testing for that bad streak from hell is not so easy. To find that killer bad streak manually would be very tedious. You'd realistically need some kind of algorithm or software to do that kind of testing. Maybe that's why nobody has found it yet.

And sorry but we have to remove your signature. Commercial information like that isnt allowed in signatures. Yes I'm the exception, because I pay for the hosting and running the forum.

Once again, many users have tried to find a worse sequence than the one of the example I've posted on this topic but they didn't find anything worse among LITERALLY millions of results.

I'm talking about millions of simulated results, including also the WHOLE archive of Wiesbaden casino.

I know only Wiesbaden brick and mortar casino which publishes all of its results, from all of its tables each and every day!
Therefore those results are available for EVERYONE to check!

All these people just confirmed that there was NEVER worst 200 spins sequence in roulette history, they were not trying my method.

Therefore it was like an open challenge for anyone who can come out alive after such session from hell and I took the opportunity NOT ONLY to gain a profit out of such nightmare, BUT TO DO IT WITH THE LEAST POSSIBLE BANKROLL AND MAX BET!

You might call it reverse engineered but if you think it's easy to create a method which its rules are constantly the same during the whole duration, bets every spin, wins within reasonable limits, then do it yourself, personally I'd congratulated you if you had achieved such extraordinary feat.
It's easy to reverse engineer 100 spins, but not millions!

Do what you want with my signature, I don't care.

[Steve]

Blue Angel, settle down I'm not having a go at you. I simply dont believe you. Often people dont believe me either, but I dont get offended. I just know they dont know better. I only get angry if they dont bother to do proper research but think they still know everything.

In this case, I know from testing I've done, and testing from others, that hot of cold numbers or ECs dont influence future outcomes. Your system assumes otherwise. And you are applying a martingale which is just different bet sizes on different spins.

And again to do statistically significant testing to find that killer sequence would be almost impossible (at least far too tedious) to do manually. So thats probably what nobody found that sequence yet.

I do understand your system, but not the sequence you are referring to. All that matters in roulette is ODDS VS PAYOUT. Unless you improve the odds, nothing will change. The payouts never change. So any sequence you have in mind negates what really works in roulette, which is increasing the accuracy of predictions (changing the odds)