Blue Angel's HG (Fallacious)

[keepontryin]

THANKS FOR THE INSPERATION.......tell me what works best for you ?

[keepontryin]

thanks for the inspiration.......maybe being the moderator you can guide me to the right direction....ill be waiting

[Steve]

Its not a matter of what works for "me". It's what works for anyone. Truth is not opinion. See link:://:.roulettephysics.com/how-to-win-at-roulette/ which explains in plain language how roulette can and cannot be beaten, and why. Also the page link:://:.roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy/ has more detail.

[MrJ]

I agree Steve but I dont get involved anymore.

Ken

[thelaw]

I agree Steve but I dont get involved anymore.

Ken

If that were only true...........funny how you keep popping up. 

Maybe sharing some of your knowledge.................instead of reminding everyone that you're not sharing knowledge .

.................but you are a Mod, so I guess that's accepted here. Wait!.......Didn't you say that you asked Steve to remove you as a Moderator.............now I'm completely confused.

So you are a Mod, but have requested not to be, and your posting on a forum to let members know that you're no longer involved. 

[MrJ]

@thelaw >> Please stop attacking me. Thank you and have a blessed day.

Ken

[thelaw]

@thelaw >> Please stop attacking me. Thank you and have a blessed day.

Ken

@MrJ>>I'm an Atheist..........but Thank you Ken......all the best!

[keepontryin]

thanks steve for directing me to that interesting link......that being said ....what are you doing here ?

[MrG]

Hello,

I tested this system betting on red colour with original rules, though the martingale cycle was 36, because I tried it for no zero spins and it didn't work the bets went to sky. So I played a bit with it, the "best" way of play I found is kind of hit and run. So to stop playing once you are 1 in plus or once stoploss is reached while the stoploss is set to -1 000. The progression is changed so that there is still cycle of 36, but there is not martingale, but the bet is increased by 1/3 and rounded up. If the progression is bigger than is needed to get to +1 the progression is reduced so that if win you are in +1. I tested this for 920 000 games. The result bankroll is 93 360, the number of spins played is 16 173 148, so on average you need 173 spins to make 1 unit. I think drawdowns can get very deep.

[vladir]

I have tested this over 2 billions spins. You would need a huge bankroll to play this - almost 20.000 units and also table limmits over 5000 on EC to survive the biggest drawdowns...   Not playable anywhere as far as I know of...

[ozon]

Hi MrG, I  got question , could  you introduce  exactly as you play this progression.
What stakes exactly You  use.
I would be very grateful

[RouletteGhost]

I certainly appreciate blue angels posts

Well thought out and even if it isnt good he shares which is good

I give him kudos

That being said, this system is not playable at all

[celescliff]

Not playable anywhere as far as I know of...

That being said, this system is not playable at all

I agree. I'm not here to mock the method but this one isn't playable because of the amount of spins the tests has been to be in profit.

I know, that shouldn't come from me, since I've posted long ass test myself before, but I regret them all.

Now, my tests are based on this: time. For how many spins per day can I play this game? 30. And maybe 2-4 times per month I can go as far as to 60, but never more than that.

Why so few spins? Simple, it's because I have a fiance and a daughter. The tests I do nowadays must be within those spins, or my test is not fair because I have a family. If my test doesent show profit in the first 30 spins I've lost.

In this method, if I were to be 3u + in less than 30 spins, I would be alot happier than with 30u + in 333 spins. And since you need to track 36 spins before you place a bet, I can't test it.

I've got nothing against BA and haven't seen proof that this method has tanked in 1000 000 spins, but I don't need it. simply because this method is not realistic to play in roulette.

[MrG]

Hi MrG, I  got question , could  you introduce  exactly as you play this progression.
What stakes exactly You  use.
I would be very grateful

As I wrote it is hit and run style, it is played in games. Every game is independent from other games, so for every game the starting bankroll is 0. Game ends either when you are 1 unit in plus or when you reach the stoploss -1 000. The progression cycle is shortened to 36. So if none of the abovementioned conditions is met and 36 bets were placed the bet amount is increased by 1/3 and rounded up. I always start with bet 1 unit. For example if you are at bet 10 and 36 bets were placed than you increase bet by 1/3, what is 10/3 = 3,3333 rounded up is 4. So you increase bet size by 4, now the bet is 14. If other 36 bets were placed you add 1/3 to 14 and this is new bet size and so on.

[MrG]

And I forgot to mention that once bet is higher than is needed in order to get to +1 the bet is decreased to such value.