Blue Angel's HG (Fallacious)

[ozon]

Thanks for the answer, when I read your post carefully I understood exactly the same.
My only disclaimer is that 10,000 units enough to make this strategy work, or drowdawns are much larger.
I know stoplose session is 1,000 units

[MrG]

Thanks for the answer, when I read your post carefully I understood exactly the same.
My only disclaimer is that 10,000 units enough to make this strategy work, or drowdawns are much larger.
I know stoplose session is 1,000 units

Regarding drawdowns I don't know. The biggest drawdown I have seen is -1 128, but that is just for one game. If it cummulates, it can be much bigger, I'm afraid that even more than 10 000.

[thelaw]

Everyone posting testing results:

Make sure to read the method carefully.

Some testers are just picking a color and pushing forward with the Martingale. This is not the method.

The bet selection changes with each and every cycle of 37 spins.

Choosing only 1 color was used in the example based on a "worst case scenario" w/l registry. 

[ozon]

My improvements from another forum this
This is only a concept, when we have a such and strong progressions as Blue Angel, we can make improvements, let's assume That we play RNG in begin to look forward to sessions waiting for imbalance of 10 hits in first 20 spins (let's say 14 -4 or 15-5 in the EC bets) then start betting on the side with low hits. We play only Those sessions.
Then we are already at the start plus 10 positions in the first 37 spins, Which are the first stage of the Blue Angel progression. The next improvement is used safebreaks, dry as virtual wine after 4 losers. The session ends when you first get out on the plus side. We enable the new sessions, and begin to look for a new trigger.

[denzie]

Well, let's use the above as an example :

Table Limit : 5000

Units won : 29

Highest bet : 64, but let's say 128 as the method states

So your 1 unit base could be as high as 39 x 29units won = $1131 for 5hrs work or $226/hr.

$226/hr x 40hrs per week = $9048/wk or $470,496 per year

Can you explain this pls ?
Btw ... what are the average table limits in the states ?

[denzie]

Nvm just got it. Well looks like your table limits are bit better then my local casino. 

[thelaw]

Nvm just got it. Well looks like your table limits are bit better then my local casino. 

I was going off average vegas tables..........$5000 limit is not that unusual.

The real question would be one of heat, but with a Marty............they would love for you to play as long as you like.

I would probably choose 1 table per day, and try to hit each casino once per month (or less if possible). Again..........a grinder....

[denzie]

Blue_Angel claims it's been tested on millions simulated spins and the whole wiesbaden archive?

Now that's a claim you don't hear every day. Anyone can tank it ?

[thelaw]

Blue_Angel claims it's been tested on millions simulated spins and the whole wiesbaden archive?

Now that's a claim you don't hear every day. Anyone can tank it ?

Just in case anyone brings it up..........Reyth claimed that he had to go to 3000 units to survive over 10,000 spins, but refused to show the sequence where it ran out of control.

BA challenged him, but Reyth claims that he lost the data......

[denzie]

The RX-CREW should easily clear this one up. .... Anyone?

[Nickmsi]

Hello all,

I also tried a very similar system to this one with the following small differences.

Instead of waiting 37 spins to get the least hit EC, I start betting after the 1st spin.  Blue Angel I believe  only bet one EC at a time even if there was a tie.  I bet all EC that are tied so after the first spin I would be betting on 5 EC that have not hit.  Eventually you will only have 1 EC to bet on but this gives us more action to start rather than wait for 37 spins before betting.

As soon as a new EC becomes the least hit, I start betting. No waiting until the 37 spin cycle completes.

Those are the only changes I can think of.

The graph of the results for 1,000,000 spins attached.

Cheers

Nick

[denzie]

Wow...look at that.
Go get your 100k from Steve 

How did you apply the progression?

Of course a run downhill on that graph means a looooong time to get back up in reality. But still 

[RouletteGhost]

Hello all,

I also tried a very similar system to this one with the following small differences.

Instead of waiting 37 spins to get the least hit EC, I start betting after the 1st spin.  Blue Angel I believe  only bet one EC at a time even if there was a tie.  I bet all EC that are tied so after the first spin I would be betting on 5 EC that have not hit.  Eventually you will only have 1 EC to bet on but this gives us more action to start rather than wait for 37 spins before betting.

As soon as a new EC becomes the least hit, I start betting. No waiting until the 37 spin cycle completes.

Those are the only changes I can think of.

The graph of the results for 1,000,000 spins attached.

Cheers

Nick

maybe im not understanding something properly, but any hit equals 3 ECs?

[thelaw]

Hello all,

I also tried a very similar system to this one with the following small differences.

Instead of waiting 37 spins to get the least hit EC, I start betting after the 1st spin.  Blue Angel I believe  only bet one EC at a time even if there was a tie.  I bet all EC that are tied so after the first spin I would be betting on 5 EC that have not hit.  Eventually you will only have 1 EC to bet on but this gives us more action to start rather than wait for 37 spins before betting.

As soon as a new EC becomes the least hit, I start betting. No waiting until the 37 spin cycle completes.

Those are the only changes I can think of.

The graph of the results for 1,000,000 spins attached.

Cheers

Nick

So roughly +1 unit every 55 spins vs +1 unit for every 10 spins with BA's FHG..............either way it's still a winner!!!

[denzie]

So roughly +1 unit every 35 spins vs +1 unit for every 10 spins with BA's FHG..............either way it's still a winner!!!

FHG?