Blue Angel's HG (Fallacious)

[Turner]

You could say......

Beware of Greeks bearing gifts

[RouletteGhost]

My wifes greek

So no offense here

But

A lot of the roulette forum shenanigans come from greece

[The General]

So Angelo Attoni aka Blue Angel =Kav

Makes sense.

Someone also said that Reyth was likely Kav as well?  Not sure about this one.

[celescliff]

Anyone care to explain why a person would go by having multiple usernames in the same community?

[RouletteGhost]

Anyone care to explain why a person would go by having multiple usernames in the same community?

I know of a few that have

Live in their moms basements? Bored? Psycho?

Some even pretend to be other genders on here

Helena was one. Hehehehe. Sorry to bus ya bubble guys helena was a retread and a MAN BABY

link:s://youtu.be/NrWuMwRKH2c

[thelaw]

What the hell is going on here..........something is rotten!!!

I looked at the last spreadsheet released by Albalaha, which showed the BA method as successful, but claimed it failed. After asking about this, here is the response :

answer to thelaw:..by Albalaha,

quote.
  Every session can win with a martingale of any form. It is the max bet of few thousands and DDs of -12000 or even more that makes it  not at all playable.
   
Sadly it is being preached that this method wins at last but it is not told that any big simulation may seek thousands of chips and bets of thousands too, in a spin. How many can bet 4096 units in a go or even more? The shown sample session won at last but with max bet of 2048 units and DD of -12,000 and -10,000.

====================================
this is the horror session shown in excel with bet of 2048 and drawdown of 10k and 12k.


I am also attaching a superhorror session where one will need to bet over 65000 units with BA progression with its graph. One can put this session in the tracker and see how bad marty goes in all its forms.

unquote
==============
graph...by Albalaha

----------------------------------------------------Then a response from Nickmsi :

Hello. . . .

I ran your Super Horror Session and have attached the graph results

My bet selection was Black or Red, whichever had the least hits.

Largest bet = 64 units

Max Drawdown = 437 units

Cheers

Nick

All documents attached below.....

[Steve]

The main reasons people have multiple usernames:

1. To back themselves up in arguments, when nobody else will

2. To discredit others

3. To say whatever they want without worrying about how they look

4. When they made themselves look like an idiot, or people dont like them, and they want a new fresh identity

In Kavs case, to promote his forum (make it seem more popular), and get other people to test his ideas instead of doing the work himself.

It seems now hes run from this forum. I wonder why.

Im sorry Kav, now you dislike me even more. Ive seen this spiral like yours happen before. Remember the email i sent you trying to make peace, but you ignored it? But let me offer it again. Im not your enemy. Not your friend either. People are allowed to explain why your system fails. And moderators can remove spam.

Remove your utter crap about me, then i dont need to explain to people your deception. if youre like mark howe, youll try and do more to harm me, but end up harming yourself more. I expect you wont heed this, but hope you will. Email me directly if you want to discuss.

Also Alabalah is right about the martingale. Thats why there are table betting limits.

[Nickmsi]

The General posted:

"Regarding post number 40...

He didn't test it over 1 million placed bets.  He simply hopped in and out of a million spins and probably only placed a few hundred...possibly a couple of thousand actual bets.

  After the same number of placed bets you'll find that the failure rate is the same with or without Blue's trigger."


The 1,000,000 spins was 1,000,000 placed bets.

It bet every spin, the EC with the lowest hit rate was the bet selection.

The money management was the key to it's success.

Cheers

Nick

[RouletteGhost]

The General posted:

"Regarding post number 40...

He didn't test it over 1 million placed bets.  He simply hopped in and out of a million spins and probably only placed a few hundred...possibly a couple of thousand actual bets.

  After the same number of placed bets you'll find that the failure rate is the same with or without Blue's trigger."


The 1,000,000 spins was 1,000,000 placed bets.

It bet every spin, the EC with the lowest hit rate was the bet selection.

The money management was the key to it's success.

Cheers

Nick

Ok so it worked. 1 million bets and you won

The man who registered to troll assumed you went in and out and didnt bet everytime

Nick. This is all the proof i need. Money management and progression does work

[Turner]

Anyone care to explain why a person would go by having multiple usernames in the same community?

My take....well I have always been Turner...in every forum

I think if you like yourself, and you are proud of what you have done, or have learned, you want to be seen as yourself.

You form a personality which isnt dissimilar to who you are in the real world.

Its hard creating a personality in 1 dimension
No eyebrows to lift, no cheeks to blush and no tell tell body language.

Text it 1D. Its hard communicating in 1D.

I feel that I am me in here, and try to cope with a 1D language..

But some dont correlate this text world as real.

They go and say things that they wouldnt dream of saying in the real world

The lame can walk. The shy can be bold. The ugly can be beautiful

They grow balls. Balls they dont really have....and they dont know what to do with them.

They get in a mess and create other names to support themselves or try and start again when it becomes untenable

It doesnt matter....its not the real world. But the same personality defect soon shows because they arnt getting the same kudos (perceived by them) that the well known name got.

Its quite sad really 

You will find me pretty much as I am in the real world.

And the name changers? Probably a lot more subdued than you would expect

[Steve]

Without increasing accuracy of predictions, no money management can work. It's literally impossible because all you're doing is making independent bets all with the same odds.

Probably no zero roulette was used.  Why is the rx file not being provided if the system is free anyway?

[Turner]

Without increasing accuracy of predictions, no money management can work. It's literally impossible because all you're doing is making independent bets all with the same odds.

Probably no zero roulette was used.  Why is the rx file not being provided of the system is free anyway?

By playing the ECs and playing cold ones, and playing martingale, you are playing the game for what it was designed for. Casino profit

Playing the game like this introduces a -2.7%, or -5.4% expectation.

You can big it up as much as you want, but this is the true story.

[MrJ]

Ok so it worked. 1 million bets and you won

The man who registered to troll assumed you went in and out and didnt bet everytime

Nick. This is all the proof i need. Money management and progression does work

What proof?

Ken

[RouletteGhost]

What proof?

Ken

I believe nickmsi

[Steve]

Why is the rx file not being provided if the system is free anyway? Nick, why not provide it? You have should have nothing to lose.