Blue Angel's HG (Fallacious)

[speed]

definitely the holy grail I tested on 37 million spins, now we no longer need computers VB and other nonsense haha

By the way , I advise everyone to start as soon as possible to play this for real money, because they will likely change the roulette rules because of this system

[Blue_Angel]

All of these people who have turned against my method with one way or the other have something in common, they are selling something.

So they are considering me as rival but I've nothing to sell, actually I've nothing to prove because I don't profit from what you believe.

My posts are appearing after hours, thus it's pointless to keep on writing here.
We could carry on our discussions at another forum.

Goodbye,

Angelo

[Turner]

definitely the holy grail I tested on 37 million spins, now we no longer need computers VB and other nonsense haha

By the way , I advise everyone to start as soon as possible to play this for real money, because they will likely change the roulette rules because of this system

I need that Nikola Tesla avatar back. I really do 

[thelaw]

Hi Azim,

I have no idea what you want.

As far as I can tell, RX extreme produces 2 history reports.

I have already posted the first one and the 2nd one (betting marquee) is attached.

If there is another report that RX produces, just let me know and I will post it.

Cheers

Nick

Ok. Not sure how Nickmsi ran this, but it's nowhere near BA's actual method.

It appears that Nickmsi didn't play in 37 spins cycles as instructed, but just played until the 37 spin cycle would have been a loss, then doubled the bet.

Not sure...........the excel doc is a mess!!!

I was hoping someone would actually take this seriously...........but it looks like we can't even test a system properly.

The good news is that Steve, or any other admin, wouldn't even need to suppress a winning system................we can screw this up all by ourselves!!!

[Turner]

Ok. Not sure how Nickmsi ran this, but it's nowhere near BA's actual method.

It appears that Nickmsi didn't play in 37 spins cycles as instructed, but just played until the 37 spin cycle would have been a loss, then doubled the bet.

Not sure...........the excel doc is a mess!!!

I was hoping someone would actually take this seriously...........but it looks like we can't even test a system properly.

The good news is that Steve, or any other admin, wouldn't even need to suppress a winning system................we can screw this up all by ourselves!!!

Its a good topic, Law, and you make a lot of sense.

Not sure about all the strutting Peac***s you hired.

Nice show with a few beers though 

[speed]

I need that Nikola Tesla avatar back. I really do 

You do not like Monica Bellucci?

[thelaw]

Its a good topic, Law, and you make a lot of sense.

Not sure about all the strutting Peac***s you hired.

Nice show with a few beers though 

Strutting peac***s?

[Steve]

Law, no im not claiming psychic powers. Ill explain more about my reasearch another time. And i did approach Randi for his challenge, but he refused saying the challenge is open only to celebrities. Randi is a fraud.

Azim, a roulette computer simoly measures ball and rotor speed, and does a kind of analysis to predict where the ball will land. It only needs to be right enough of the time for consistent profits.

Blueangel, you said:

Are you a fairytale?
How much Steve gave you to write this craps?!
You are "cheap" after all!

Azim is just reporting what he finds, and it appears the results dont look good for you. Dont shoot the messenger. I have nothing to do with his testing.

Blueangel you said:

All of these people who have turned against my method with one way or the other have something in common, they are selling something.
So they are considering me as rival but I've nothing to sell, actually I've nothing to prove because I don't profit from what you believe.
My posts are appearing after hours, thus it's pointless to keep on writing here.
We could carry on our discussions at another forum.
Goodbye,
Angelo

1. Its not a big conspiracy, and nobody is turning againt anyone. Simply your system is being tested and is tanking. Now you are upset about how it makes you look.

2. Actually you are selling systems. We now know about the kavouras bet youre selling, your fake names and your amazon account also selling systems. But I dont see you as a rival at all. A martingale is a very different thing to advantage play. Even if you were some sort of competitor it wouldnt bother me. I would even care to mention you unless i had to refute nonsense you spread. Thats why i dont even talk about Jafco. He is a competitor but he never wrote crap about me, so i have no need to get into any talk about him.

3. You dont get it. I have no interest in hiding a winning system. I would LOVE for the hg to exist and i welcome all open testing here, like we are doing with your martingale. Just because your system loses isnt reason to attack the forum owner or the people who, from their own free time, are testing your system. All i keep repeating is you need to increase accuracy of predictions. You need to improve the odds. Am i really wrong?

4. Your last comment looks more like an excuse to escape a dead end situation for you. You have been harping on about how great your system is, and how me and my advantage play methods suck, that im a scammer, but you dont want to stick around and face the truth.

5. When have i ever stopped testing of systems? Try to understand. I try to help people and help steer them in the right dirction with plain facts. If people dont believe me, its fine. Do you see me stopping testing? No, i encourage testing. Its you who is avoiding testing now, and you are attacking testers and suggesting they work for me or something in a big conspiracy against you martingale holy grail.

[amk]

Speed,

During my roulette research I cannot leave any stone unturned.

37 million spins?

[Steve]

BA, i have ample information that suggests you are kav, and more now but i dont really care. i removed your post restriction, but please dont go posting crap again. You can have opinions, but lets stick to non personal stuff and just focus on testing.

Also dont go saying im trying to supress winning systems. Im strongly encouraging testing. If you knew me better, youd know i want the truth, always. Convenient or not. I would love you system to work, then managing my profit split teams would be so much easier. Yes i know you think im all about sales. You need to look more closely at what i do.

You clearly dont have any idea about vb or computers. Im sorry i dont mean to offend you but you really have no idea. Anyways lets just keep testing your system. And if im wrong, ill give you full control of this forum after a huge apology. But if im right, then you apologize to me, ok?

[Steve]

Alabalah, keep this in mind. You had a previous problem with me because you were promoting a system using principles that failed. And i encouraged testing and explained why your system failed. And we found it failed. And now you know better, and are preaching what i was preaching. Good on you for learning. So whats your problem with me now?

And no i was not jailed for a mass scam. Read about it. I said stock would go up 900%, but i also published unintentional misunderstandings of the companys press release. the government said my 900% estimate was dishonest. And after my sentence, it went up around 1500%. I was right. I got charged and jailed when i wad right, but it happened later so didnt change anything. And anyone who bought the stocks and held them profited. So get your facts right please. I never scammed anyone. read here link:://:.genuinewinnerroulettesystem.com/rentech/

[Steve]

And alabalah, the 120% edge demo is real. i can show you too if you really like. Do you think i use magnets or something? Have a look for yourself. we play where its legal only. Our legs dont get broken. Is it all so hard for you to believe? You can see what my computers can do, and why i dont need to sell anything. And why im not threatened by another system. If theres something better, show me! Ill use it myself.

Watch it carefully. And anyone can see it in person. I even do live webcam demos. There is no reasonable proof people cant see.

link:://youtu.be/PUqjvSvEnX8

Amd BA, you dont know anything about computers either. We can win willions quickly as the ritz team did, but then we get detected. That limits winnings. Again you know nothing. You dont even understand martingale yet.

[The General]

All of these people who have turned against my method with one way or the other have something in common, they are selling something.-Blue Angel

Blue,

I have nothing to sell. 

Do a little more research on the history of the game, and you'll find everything that you need to know about why the Martingale fails.

Best of luck,

The General.

[Steve]

Alabalah, i didn't ban you for having a system that threatened me.  I banned you because you were selling what you claimed was the holy grail, and couldn't provide any shred of proof it wasn't a scam. You were selling systems and using fake name and duplicate accounts. 

And i explained that your previous system to called the hg also failed.  Because it was a martingale.

I gave you ample chance to prove your claims and prove you weren't scamming people.  Because if you sell a losing system,  that's scamming. That's why i banned you. The reasons ate nothing like you claim.

Any system for sale here needs to be substantiated to protect members from scams. You had ample chance to do this but couldn't.

The rubbish you say about me is inaccurate from vedetta. No integrity.  It's no different to kav. All system sellers. Don't get me wrong.  I don't have vendetta. I just sincerely don't care about other systems. I have what i have and it works pretty damn well.

If either you or NA, both system sellers,  prove that your audience really work with rng, I'll pay you $100k. I'll even throw in this forum for free.  If you can't take the challenge and think you can beat a 120% edge as i can get, then maybe shhh. Ok?

[MrJ]

 Playing a Marty is the BEGINNING of class. Everything past that gets a bit easier. Before a Marty is what? Nothing.

Ken