Blue Angel's HG (Fallacious)

[Blue_Angel]

I can't answer that, I personally don't think it is. But I could be wrong.

This was from 00 wheel.

Every bet selection has its own cycle, for EC's is 2 spins, for dozens and columns 3 spins, for lines 6 spins, for corners 9 spins, for streets 12 spins, for splits 18 spins and for numbers 36 spins.

Betting each selection separately, on its own cycle with the proper progression is the way to go.

Answer the following questions:

1) The probability of 1/37 has NEVER being confirmed, why we never ever going to see 37 different numbers in 37 successive outcomes??

2) Why all sections of the wheel's and table's layout will never contain ALL of the hot or cold numbers??

[Azim]

?

[thelaw]

As the OP, I wanted to present some new info regarding this method from the creator himself.

BlueAngel has now admitted that this was a fake method produced to deceive other members.

Here is our interaction from GF:

BA:

''The (f)Law"' can identify a HG when he sees one, such as Martingales, Laboucherets, Fibonaccis and the list goes on...not to mention that he had invited me to Steve's forum to present my Fallacious Holy Grail...
Have you ever thought why I called it fallacious?!
I've created and used much better than that but there are so many fools around the web who think: "if it's winning, has to be Marty!"
Go figure...!

TL:

Personally, never found any HG, so not sure what BA is referring to here.

I posted one of BA's methods from BetSelection over at .cc for discussion, and he openly defended it, so not sure why he appears to be distancing himself from it now.

From the above post, it appears that he is implying that he created and posted a method specifically designed to lose............I'm officially confused.o_O

If anyone can clear this up, I would appreciate it

Then there is another exchange regarding info from Turbo (unrelated) where BA calls out Turbo's method as deception.

TL:

Aren't you the one who posted a fake method with the Fallacious Holy Grail?

BA:

People out there are constantly looking for the next big thing, I've only provided them the means to destroy themselves, can't blame me, they asked for it!

I would like to offer an apology to anyone who invested any time in this method. Had I known it was a fake, I never would have posted it.

Another member bites the dust.

Cheers!

[Steve]

BlueAngel has now admitted that this was a fake method produced to deceive other members.

The guy is a dickhead. You didn't know?

There's quite a few of them. Around.

[Blue_Angel]

The guy is a dickhead. You didn't know?

There's quite a few of them. Around.

Steve you are right, I'm a dickhead because I pay attention to such craps as those coming from you.

[Steve]

BA I've never seen you post anything of value. Your latest approach is just touching on AP, but its a terrible version showing no understanding.

You're not in any position to criticize my understanding especially while touting your own. You are just another dickhead attacking me but knowing nothing. if we had any rational discussion about who knew what they were talking about and who was full of shit, the result wouldn't suit you.

And you're just another troll who loves to create drama at other peoples expense. There's a forum for people like you.

[Blue_Angel]

BA I've never seen you post anything of value. Your latest approach is just touching on AP, but its a terrible version showing no understanding.

You're not in any position to criticize my understanding especially while touting your own. You are just another dickhead. if we had any rational discussion about who knew what they were talking about and who wad full of shit, the result wouldn't suit you.

Well that's just your opinion, whether reflects reality or not is another thing.
What did you expect? To reveal step by step instructions of how I play?
I just share some ideas, not my main methods, and I expect through interaction to develop and improve them.
Unfortunately the vast majority of members just read without actively participating, by participating I don't mean necessarily to share systems but at least to provide some feedback and suggestions based on testing.
Since this situation doesn't change for the better, regardless of which forum, how could someone like me continue to share? Let alone of something valuable.
Why to do so? For receiving your throwing "rocks" and in best case the nothing?!
People whether care only for what they take without giving anything back, or they already know better than anyone else, therefore it's pointless to discuss since they have already made up their minds.
Posting without interaction is pointless, I'm not writing to read it myself but that's how most of the forums for most of the time are sadly.
Afterall, perhaps it's my fault to expect so much from others when they don't give a shit except from what they can get.

[Steve]

Deliberately misleading people then making fun of them is not helping them. Its harmful to them.

Or is that just my opinion?

There are many holes in what you say and your behavior. Many contradictions and misunderstandings.

[Blue_Angel]

Deliberately misleading people then making fun of them is not helping them. Its harmful to them.

Or is that just my opinion?

There are many holes in what you say and your behavior. Many contradictions and misunderstandings.

You got me, what can I say? 

Assume what you like, everyone is free to form his/her own conclusions.

[Steve]

No need to "assume". Anyone who deliberately misleads people for kicks is a dickhead.

You have other problems too but no point in wasting the time. People like you never change. You are already "grown up". It's just the person you are. It's not something to be proud of.

[Blue_Angel]

No need to "assume". Anyone who deliberately misleads people for kicks is a dickhead.

You have other problems too but no point in wasting the time. People like you never change. You are already "grown up". It's just the person you are. It's not something to be proud of.

Thank you of letting me know of who I'm and what I do.

[DoctorSudoku]

Answer the following questions:

1) The probability of 1/37 has NEVER being confirmed, why we never ever going to see 37 different numbers in 37 successive outcomes??

2) Why all sections of the wheel's and table's layout will never contain ALL of the hot or cold numbers??

Focusing on your second question, it is a little bit unclear what you are asking. More specifically, your usage of the term "all sections" is a tad bit nebulous.

Do you mean why ONE PARTICULAR section of the wheel (or table) will NOT contain all of the hot or cold numbers?

Or do you mean why all of the the hot or cold numbers are NOT uniformly distributed across all of the various sections of the wheel (or table)?

[Blue_Angel]

What I mean is that not all hits are gathering in a single part of the wheel.
In a chaotic and random behavior there's no perfect symmetry, will we ever witness 1 hit on every slot around the wheel? no

Will we ever witness 19 slots (any half of the wheel) with 37 hits while the other has none? no

Will we ever witness adjacent, continuous slots to form a pattern of hits like 2 hits, 1 hit, 0 hits, 2 hits, 1 hit, 0 hits,  2 hits, 1 hit, 0 hits...all over the wheel? definitely no

By discarding what it's not going to happen we effectively shorting out our available options, the focus should be on mid-short term, when it's being confirmed by the results it starts all over.

[jekhb76]

I have tested this over 2 billions spins. You would need a huge bankroll to play this - almost 20.000 units and also table limmits over 5000 on EC to survive the biggest drawdowns...   Not playable anywhere as far as I know of...

Play with cents only and you've got yourself a HG! My Table limits when i would like to play with cent are 30.000 units and a bankroll of 1000 euro (100.000 cents) should do the trick. The only question is, are you willing to put that time and effort in it and only get 29 cents in return ?

[jekhb76]

Too bad, that it a fake i'm the End. Well we should ha e known.