KTF's cousin named WTF (if everyone agrees)

[curiosone]

This surely was no bust for me. As I play it.
Spin  21,  22 , 23 were non hits. ... so my first bet would be after that.....easy session 

Hello Denzie,so after all those numbers,and that good count,still wait this much before betting?

[curiosone]

curiosone
This is the nearest sheet from 111 games to your numbers

Thanks Noto,i will study,here KTF wins easy,but those sequence for the repetears still don t convince me

[curiosone]

-Curiosone

OR
It is +50 after spin 17 with KTF

As I said before practice with Nottos numbers and learn to bet repeats (WTF) and in the mean time just play KTF.
Won 99 times out of 100 with an $800 br.
FYI - I would not limit the progression like you stated.

-Celtic



U must admit that my session was a tricky one )

[denzie]

Hello Denzie,so after all those numbers,and that good count,still wait this much before betting?

Yep. I've seen those "good" counts kick my $ss to much.

[Celticknits]

Yes I agree, it was a tricky one.

Would have been nice to see the next 8 numbers though.
Even at the end the count was still 14 +5 with 8 spins to come and 7 repeats due to come I would have gone for it with odds like that but I probably would also have quit as soon as being in a positive total.

-Celtic

[Turner]

Yes I agree, it was a tricky one.

Would have been nice to see the next 8 numbers though.

They are random. You could just get 8 numbers from random.org and stick them on the end.

Try it.

[Priyanka]

They are random. You could just get 8 numbers from random.org and stick them on the end.

Try it.

What happened to personal permeance.

[Turner]

What happened to personal permeance.

You are missing my hidden irony 

[Celticknits]

Thanks Noto,i will study,here KTF wins easy,but those sequence for the repetears still don t convince me

-Curiosone

If you bet for repeaters on the sheet that Notto posted for Jackpot 247 8Feb16 you should hit a Win/Stop of +$85 at spin 28.

-Celtic

[The General]

"If" ...is not good

[Priyanka]

You are missing my hidden irony 

[Priyanka]

"If" ...is not good

Do you wait for a "biased" post      Habits 

[Celticknits]

They are random. You could just get 8 numbers from random.org and stick them on the end.

Try it.

-Turner

With your irony statement above to Priyanka I am not sure where you are going with this anyways I'll say that it does not make sense to me to use numbers from a completely seperate RNG source to complete a 37 spin cycle that is already 29 spins in.
To me all of the numbers should be generated from the same source in 37 consecutive spins.

I do have a question for you though:
In your opinion can the numbers from random.org be used safely for testing?

-Celtic

[Celticknits]

"If" ...is not good

Why?

[Priyanka]

to me to use numbers from a completely seperate RNG source to complete a 37 spin cycle that is already 29 spins in.
To me all of the numbers should be generated from the same source in 37 consecutive spins.

Celtic - as twocat would put it hear me now and listen to me later. It doesnt matter. Whether you get 37 from same source or you jump from willhill to ladbrokes to paddy getting one spin each from nottos machine of death, it is the same.. End of the day.. it is RANDOM