KTF's cousin named WTF (if everyone agrees)

[denzie]

Is that the JackJoy casino (whatever its called)?

Ken

Doesn't matter. We can't play it. They not allow players from outside the UK. I've tried.

[RouletteGhost]

Thank you for that RG.

-Celtic

the people that give others a hard time there are usually 2 requirements: the one getting the hard time is the one posting charts and proof and profits, the one giving the hard time does not post anything worth while anymore! the general for example?

dont tell someone their method wont work when they post their sheet every single day...enough is enough.....stop hating!

give the people a hard time that post results and methods and sheets?

what the hell sense does that make its what the forum is for. its the testing section i might point out to

[RouletteGhost]

i will give credit where credit is due

mr j plays for a living i believe

that takes guts

credit for that

but dont be a male sausage!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[thelaw]

i will give credit where credit is due

mr j plays for a living i believe

that takes guts

credit for that

but dont be a male sausage!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No evidence that MrJ actually plays for a living, so "believe" is the appropriate term.

[RouletteGhost]

No evidence that MrJ actually plays for a living, so "believe" is the appropriate term.

however there is PLENTY of evidence notto does well with KTF

[RouletteGhost]

i have to laugh

my above post was edited to say "male sausage" LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOO

is a male sausage diff from a female sausage

show me the sausage differences

LMAOOOOOOOOO

[tuddilue]

This subject came up a few weeks ago.....you are giving out the RULES after you have seen the numbers, I'm confused. Any person can say they are in the plus AFTER seeing the numbers.

Ken

I also stand up for Celtics and nottophammer.

I think your comments are strange. So for me I play all the numbers on paper and then I compare it how Celticknits and nottophammer should have played it. But that is learning process not curve fitting?

Why can't you play the numbers with your 1-4  number method? Would be interesting to see how you should play it. Thanks!

[NextYear]

I also stand up for Celtics and Nottophammer.

Shame that we have to raise hands and explain what is going on here!

[tuddilue]

Shame that we have to raise hands and explain what is going on here!

Yes I agree. It's a method that works so maybe that is the reason..

Better to help out and make the method even better!

[nottophammer]

Thanks tuddilue,nextyear and others.

I only posted about KTF as it is so simple to play and makes you profit. For me it was 50/60 units. A few suggsted take an earlier win, which makes good sense.
Jackpot247.com numbers i posted to show, i even told where they would come from so others could say yes thats what i see.

[RouletteGhost]

Yes I agree. It's a method that works so maybe that is the reason..

Better to help out and make the method even better!

It works so he snakes out Of the woodwork

Because he cant play it at his live dealer

I wont sit back and read rubbish

Hard work is at hand here.

A working method. It works. And some people cant stand it!!!!

Thats it. A method that works and a few people hate it. Thorns on a rose bush

[MrJ]

No evidence that MrJ actually plays for a living, so "believe" is the appropriate term.

100% correct. If I'm gonna say that about you, the definition needs to be the same, I agree.     

Ken

[The General]

Unfortunately, the method doesn't work.  It only appears to work because of the unintentional curve fitting within the testing.

Mathematically the player can't step outside of probability by just tracking on the sidelines because the payout will always be less than what the probabilty an event dictates as being fair.

  For example...  The probability of winning is 1 in 38 but the payout is short at 35 to 1.  So using probability to beat the random game is a foolish waste of time.  This is what the law of the third is... a game of probability that still leaves the house edge intact.

You should focus your attention on beating the wheel, rather than the random game if you want to win in the long run.

[The General]

And yes, if you post the rules of your game I can simulate it for you. 

I can show how many standard deviations the win/ loss is, the max drawdown, daily loss win, edge, etc.

[MrJ]

Unfortunately, the method doesn't work.  It only appears to work because of the unintentional curve fitting within the testing.

Mathematically the player can't step outside of probability by just tracking on the sidelines because the payout will always be less than what the probabilty an event dictates as being fair.

  For example...  The probability of winning is 1 in 38 but the payout is short at 35 to 1.  So using probability to beat the random game is a foolish waste of time.  This is what the law of the third is... a game of probability that still leaves the house edge intact.

You should focus your attention on beating the wheel, rather than the random game if you want to win in the long run.

Great post as usual General sir, thanks!!

Ken