For the MATHS boys

[RouletteGhost]

enjoy

andruchi/advanced-roulette-strategy-proportional-probabilities-system.php

based on attached photo i do not see how KTF can lose btw

[Turner]

good grief....not seen those pages for several years.

Andruchi was a scam if I remember.

[RouletteGhost]

could very well be a scam

i ran across it just now

but he did have good math on that link...see attached picture above

[Turner]

could very well be a scam

i ran across it just now

but he did have good math on that link...see attached picture above

Maths is great in this

I spent a long time looking at the section Probability Distribution of Unique Numbers in 10 Consecutive Spins.

Tried many ideas, all very similar (but not exactly) like KTF

[RouletteGhost]

according to that website 8 to 10 unique numbers in 10 spins is the most common

so one would be inclined to after 5 spins or so, bet the remaining 30 numbers, then 29, then 28 etc

but then we know what happens

11
19
31
1
9
19
22
11
36
31

catastrophe

[Turner]

according to that website 8 to 10 unique numbers in 10 spins is the most common

so one would be inclined to after 5 spins or so, bet the remaining 30 numbers, then 29, then 28 etc

but then we know what happens

11
19
31
1
9
19
22
11
36
31

catastrophe

Remember, those averages are over many spins. Averages.
The same stats over the same large amount of spins show Red and Black hit close to 50:50

We know thats not the case in the short term.

[Turner]

My point was, KTF doesnt look all that unfamiliar to me. I spent ages playing with very similar.

[The General]

based on attached photo i do not see how KTF can lose btw

I can explain how and why it will inevitably be a long term loser... if you really want to know.   But I don't want to ruin your fun, so I won't say a word.

[MrJ]

I can explain how and why it will inevitably be a long term loser... if you really want to know.   But I don't want to ruin your fun, so I won't say a word.

...and this again becomes the issue. Even if you politely made your points, nothing but problems come from it and this should NOT be the norm. Steve said he has some new type of rules coming (soon), I'm hoping this is included. I could go a step beyond what you would post General sir. Even if this method was sound, not enough time at a real casino (real table) to lay down chips. In most cases with this, not all.

Ken

[Azim]

I can explain how and why it will inevitably be a long term loser... if you really want to know.   But I don't want to ruin your fun, so I won't say a word.

I am curious as in finding out your knowledge about KTF. Can you explain why it will lose?

[RouletteGhost]

plenty of time to lay chips

celtic does it daily on airball

[MrJ]

plenty of time to lay chips

celtic does it daily on airball

I'm not knocking air ball, just talking about the old school ballers that play at a
real casino/table/wheel/dealer/chips. If they see something is kinda working well and you need time to place bets, BAM, they spin faster. This is the world I live in.

Ken

[Azim]

I'm not knocking air ball, just talking about the old school ballers that play at a
real casino/table/wheel/dealer/chips. If they see something is kinda working well and you need time to place bets, BAM, they spin faster. This is the world I live in.

Ken

Not butting heads with you.  But the point I would make is back to practice , practice and practise making bets as fast as you can.

As in every sport every one practices.

[RouletteGhost]

Yes. When u r winning they spin faster and give u less time to bet

Thats why i love airball

Also. The other version of ktf for repeaters would be fine on live dealer

[The General]

Betting quickly enough isn't the problem.

The problem is the system won't work... for reasons which everyone should already know.