Mathematically inept column strategy

[RouletteGhost]

Disclaimer: Will burn the eyes if you are anti progression or anti trigger

This uses the 1, 3, 9 for testing purposes to see if I have something cookin here

When the last 2 columns are different, bet those 2 columns, on a loss, wait for the 2 past columns to be different again

Here is a 42 live spin example (real world play)

C
B
A (bet C, B, lose) 1 chip each    -2
B (bet A, B, win) 3 chips each   +3
B (bet A, B, win) 1 chip each      +1
A (no bet, last 2 were same)
B (bet A, B, win) 1 chip each       +1
B (bet A, B, win) 1 chip each     +1
A (no bet)
A (bet A, B, win) 1 chip each    +1
C (no bet)
A (bet A, C, win) 1 chip each     +1
A (bet C, A, win) 1 chip each    +1
A (no bet)
A (no bet)
C (no bet)
B (bet A, C, lose) 1 chip each    -2
C (bet B, C, win) 3 chips each    +3
B (bet B, C, win) 1 chip each     +1
B (bet B, C, win) 1 chip each     +1
C (no bet)
B (bet B, C, win) 1 chip each     +1
C (bet B, C, win) 1 chip each     +1
C (bet B, C, win) 1 chip each     +1
A (no bet)
C (bet A, C, win) 1 chip each    +1
A (bet A, C, win) 1 chip each     +1
A (bet A, C, win) 1 chip each     +1
B (no bet)
B (bet A, B, win) 1 chip each      +1
B (no bet)
B (no bet)
C (no bet)
B (bet B, C, win) 1 chip each     +1
A (bet B, C, lose) 1 chip each    -2
A (bet A, B, win) 3 chips each    +3
C (no bet)
C (bet A, C, win) 1 chip each    +1
C (no bet)
C (no bet)
B (no bet)
C (bet B, C, win) 1 chip each    +1

+21 units



lots of success in zumma and live wheel so figured I'd publish it

[RouletteGhost]

Flat bet will work as well if the win rate continues this way

Same test flat bet

+15 units

[TurboGenius]

Disclaimer: Will burn the eyes if you are anti progression or anti trigger

Nice !

I would throw in some law of third stuff also.
Which would say that if two different columns show up then bet them - because it's more likely
that one will repeat over the third column showing up. (which is what you're doing)

How do you treat the zero/double zero ? A no bet until (coughs) qualified again ?

and throw in dozens at the same time ? Same odds - etc. You can win (or test) twice as fast.
(or the cross section numbers straight up when you have 2 dozens and 2 columns in play at once.)
Grins. Just throwing that out there.

[RouletteGhost]

 .

[RouletteGhost]

Nice !

I would throw in some law of third stuff also.
Which would say that if two different columns show up then bet them - because it's more likely
that one will repeat over the third column showing up. (which is what you're doing)

How do you treat the zero/double zero ? A no bet until (coughs) qualified again ?

and throw in dozens at the same time ? Same odds - etc. You can win (or test) twice as fast.
(or the cross section numbers straight up when you have 2 dozens and 2 columns in play at once.)
Grins. Just throwing that out there.

Thanks for the idea

I know you have played similar way back when maybe not this exact way but similar

If 0 shows no bet

The past 2 spins must be 2 different columns

When a 24 number bet wins flat bet i get all excited

[MrJ]

.

RG >> Please confirm that no mod tampered with this post, thanks.

Ken

[RouletteGhost]

RG >> Please confirm that no mod tampered with this post, thanks.

Ken

Confirmed. Was me

[TurboGenius]

Figured before bed I would roll off some numbers
and play the cross section of two dozens and two columns - only when the last two spins
were from 2 different (both).
For a progression I used 1 unit each number to start - +1 unit each on a loss and returned to 1 unit after any win.
0 or 00 meant qualification again.
Not too bad - it pulled out of the drop that it took, but I know from working on it before a long time ago that the run from hell is waiting to kill it. But happy testing regardless.

[NextYear]

Thanks for idea and elaboration, RTG!

[RouletteGhost]

Thanks for idea and elaboration, RTG!

Thanks

This one im going to really make a winner

[RouletteGhost]

Figured before bed I would roll off some numbers
and play the cross section of two dozens and two columns - only when the last two spins
were from 2 different (both).
For a progression I used 1 unit each number to start - +1 unit each on a loss and returned to 1 unit after any win.
0 or 00 meant qualification again.
Not too bad - it pulled out of the drop that it took, but I know from working on it before a long time ago that the run from hell is waiting to kill it. But happy testing regardless.

Long term not required. 40 spins max.

If you have a losing day so be it

[MrJ]

All of your 40 spin sessions put together.....is the long term (and more).

Ken

[TurboGenius]

All of your 40 spin sessions put together.....is the long term (and more).

Ken

Nah lol - People don't want to see that.
If I take one step, once a day - I would get to the store in a year or so.
These people would say that I didn't travel the distance to the store - I just took one step per day and that's something totally different.
"Short term" doesn't even have a definition. Is it 10 spins ? 100 spins ? maybe 500 spins ?
"Long term" doesn't either. Is it 10,000 spins ?  A lifetime of spins ? 20 spins ?   lol
But people can stick a fork in the list and say "well, this was a short term session" and ignore
the rest of it I suppose.
As to the method, it's not bad - it works (when it works) - like others.
When it doesn't - maybe that's the short term session we can ignore.

[RouletteGhost]

most methods like this are static

this isn't

we have 'no bet' periods

the ONLY time we bet is when the previous 2 numbers fall in different columns

playing this way saves myself from 0 clusters like

24
0
16
00

[RouletteGhost]

in your test if you bet every spin then it is not this method. you may go 4 spins without a bet